Breaking news

World Legal Symposium 2026: Navigating Airline Liability In A Changing Global Landscape

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) will host the 2026 edition of the World Legal Symposium (WLS) in Warsaw, Poland, from February 17 to 19. Under the theme ‘Liability In A Changing World’, the event is set to address both enduring airline liability issues and emerging regulatory challenges that confront the global aviation sector.

Complex Legal And Regulatory Environment

In an era marked by multifaceted challenges, the symposium will explore long-standing liability exposures alongside rising compliance obligations. Topics on the agenda include environmental, social, and governance (ESG) requirements, greenwashing risks, taxation, data privacy concerns, and the evolving legal implications of artificial intelligence.

Global Implications And Regulatory Fragmentation

Drawing attention to the broader ramifications, discussions will unfold amid shifting consumer protection regimes, changing trade tariffs, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. IATA’s Corporate Secretary and Acting General Counsel Leslie MacIntosh cautions that diverging national measures risk fragmenting internationally agreed airline liability principles, potentially undermining the uniformity essential for global connectivity.

Strategic Leadership And Industry Collaboration

LOT Polish Airlines, the official host of the symposium, is keenly aware of the strategic pressures facing the aviation industry. LOT Polish Airlines President and Chief Executive Officer Michal Fijol emphasized that new regulations, emerging technologies, and evolving societal expectations are reshaping the operational dynamics of airlines. He underscored the importance of assembling leading aviation law experts, regulatory authorities, and industry representatives to address these challenges collaboratively.

Robust Program For Evolving Challenges

The symposium’s program promises a robust series of sessions that will cover a wide spectrum of legal and regulatory issues. Panel discussions will include managing geopolitical exposures linked to trade, tariffs, sanctions, and insurance, as well as a deep dive into what organizers describe as ‘Consumer Protection 2.0’. Additional sessions will examine the impact of artificial intelligence on competition law and trace the shifting boundaries of freight forwarder liability—from carrier’s agent to shipper’s agent.

An Opportunity For Thought Leadership

The three-day event will commence with a keynote address by LOT Polish Airlines CEO Michal Fijol, setting the stage for extensive discussions on adapting airline liability frameworks to a dynamic global environment. Leslie MacIntosh highlighted that the carefully curated agenda and speaker roster continue a longstanding commitment to addressing pressing issues within the aviation legal community, positioning the symposium as a critical platform for mitigating emerging risks.

By fostering dialogue among in-house experts, private practitioners, and government advisers, WLS 2026 promises not only to elucidate current legal challenges but also to advance strategic solutions for the evolving aviation landscape.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter