Breaking news

Why Cyprus Savers Saw Smaller Gains From ECB Rate Hikes

Banks in Cyprus were among the slowest in the euro area to raise deposit rates after the European Central Bank increased interest rates, according to a new ECB working paper examining deposit pricing between 2007 and 2024.

The findings place Cyprus alongside several southern European economies where savers benefited less from higher interest rates than customers in northern Europe, highlighting significant differences in how ECB monetary policy reached households across the currency union.

Deposit Rates Did Not Rise Equally Across Europe

The researchers found that banks in southern euro area countries generally passed on a smaller share of ECB rate increases to depositors than their counterparts in the north.

While monetary policy is set centrally by the ECB, its effects on savers varied widely between countries. The paper concludes that those differences were driven less by banks themselves than by the behaviour of depositors.

Why Banks Could Keep Deposit Rates Lower

According to the study, the biggest shift came after the ECB began raising interest rates in 2022.

Customers most sensitive to higher returns increasingly moved their savings into term deposits, money market funds and other interest-bearing products. Those who kept their money in overnight accounts were generally less likely to switch providers or actively seek higher rates, giving banks greater flexibility in setting deposit prices.

The researchers argue that this change in depositor behaviour played a larger role than differences in banking competition.

The Legacy Of Negative Interest Rates

Years of negative ECB interest rates also shaped how households and businesses managed their savings.

With few attractive alternatives available between 2014 and 2022, most depositors kept money in overnight accounts. Once rates started rising, wealthier households and businesses, which typically respond more quickly to changes in returns, shifted into higher-yield savings products.

Businesses proved more responsive to interest rate changes than households. Among consumers, savers in higher-income northern European countries were also more likely to move funds in search of better returns than those in lower-income southern economies, including Cyprus.

Banks Retained Strong Pricing Power

The study suggests banks maintained substantial pricing power throughout the rate-hiking cycle, allowing them to keep much of the benefit from higher interest rates rather than passing it on to depositors.

Researchers estimate that if all savers had been equally willing to move their money in search of better returns, overnight deposit rates would have been significantly higher, particularly during the ECB’s 2022–2024 tightening cycle.

That finding reinforces the paper’s central conclusion: depositor behaviour, rather than limited banking competition, was the main reason deposit rates rose more slowly than policy rates.

What It Means For Cyprus

For Cyprus, the findings illustrate why deposit rates remained relatively subdued despite one of the fastest monetary tightening cycles in the ECB’s history.

More broadly, the study suggests that the effectiveness of monetary policy depends not only on central bank decisions but also on how willing households and businesses are to actively manage their savings. Improving financial literacy and increasing awareness of alternative savings products, the authors argue, could strengthen competition for deposits and improve the transmission of future interest-rate changes.

Cyprus Crypto Users Face New Risks As MiCA Rules Take Effect

Why Investors Need To Check The Company Behind Their Crypto Platform

Crypto users in Cyprus are being urged to verify exactly which company holds their assets after the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) transition period ended on July 1, 2026.

MiCA rules for crypto-asset service providers have applied since December 2024, but Cyprus allowed companies operating under its previous national framework to continue temporarily. CySEC required providers wishing to remain in the market to apply by February 27, 2026.

The end of the transition means that appearing on an old national register is no longer enough. Investors must check the specific legal entity providing the service and the activities it is authorised to perform.

Two Regulatory Routes

CySEC maintains separate registers for providers authorised under Article 63 and companies using the Article 60 notification route.

The lists should not simply be treated as a count of licensed crypto exchanges. Providers have different regulatory statuses and may be authorised for different services, including custody, transfers, exchanges or operating trading platforms.

Companies authorised elsewhere in the EU can also serve Cypriot customers through MiCA passporting. Investors should therefore check the wider ESMA register.

Familiar Brands Can Still Be Used In Scams

MiCA authorisation applies to a specific legal entity, not automatically to every website, subsidiary or service using the same brand. Fraudsters can copy a legitimate company’s name, logo and licence number while changing its website or payment details.

The regulatory transition creates another opportunity for scammers. They can imitate legitimate notices about account closures or transfers and claim that customers must urgently move their assets to a new “regulated” platform.

In its July announcement, CySEC warned that customers using unauthorised providers do not receive MiCA protections and advised investors to verify providers through ESMA.

A Wider European Shake-Up

The changes affect the broader European crypto market. VASPnet estimated that more than 1,700 unlicensed crypto companies could face closure, relocation or restructuring after the transition period.

ESMA’s register contained 323 authorised providers at the end of July, while TRM Labs identified 1,343 operating providers in the European Economic Area on July 1, including 281 with MiCA authorisation. The different figures reflect different methodologies, but point to a substantial number of providers operating without the new authorisation.

ESMA instructed unauthorised companies to stop accepting new EU customers, opening accounts and marketing their services, while allowing limited activity needed for an orderly withdrawal.

What Investors Should Check

MiCA introduces common requirements for areas such as governance, disclosures and safeguarding client assets, but it does not make crypto investments risk-free.

For Cyprus users, the key questions are which legal entity provides the service, what it is authorised to do and whether the website or contact details are genuine.

Requests to transfer assets urgently, pay recovery fees, reveal private keys or install remote-access software should be treated as red flags. MiCA may bring greater clarity to the market, but the transition has also created a new opportunity for criminals to exploit a very real regulatory change.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter