Breaking news

WHO’s Historic Agreement: A Major Step Towards Global Pandemic Preparedness

In a groundbreaking move, members of the World Health Organization (WHO) have reached a historic, legally binding agreement aimed at preparing the world for future pandemics. This pact, designed to address the lessons learned from the COVID-19 crisis, sets the stage for a more equitable global response to health emergencies, particularly in the distribution of essential drugs, vaccines, and medical technologies.

The agreement marks a significant milestone in global health governance, especially at a time when multilateral institutions like the WHO are facing considerable financial strain. The United States, which was once the WHO’s largest financial contributor, withdrew from negotiations after President Donald Trump initiated the U.S.’s departure from the organization. Despite this setback, the deal underscores a strong commitment from member states to work together on global health security, with or without U.S. involvement. “This is a historic moment,” said Nina Schwalbe, founder of global health think tank Spark Street Advisors. “It demonstrates that countries are committed to multilateralism and to collective action.”

This agreement, the second of its kind in WHO’s 75-year history (the first being a tobacco control treaty in 2003), focuses on structural inequalities in how pandemic-related health tools are developed and distributed. Article nine of the deal ensures that future pandemic-related drugs, therapeutics, and vaccines will be made globally accessible. It also gives the WHO stronger oversight over medical supply chains and paves the way for local production of vaccines during health crises.

A key challenge in the negotiations was the issue of technology transfer—sharing the knowledge and manufacturing capabilities necessary for lower-income countries to produce their vaccines and treatments. To address this, the agreement mandates that manufacturers allocate at least 20% of their real-time production to the WHO during a pandemic, with a minimum of 10% designated for donation and the rest priced affordably for developing nations.

The deal is not yet finalized, as it must be adopted at the WHO Assembly in May, and some details, such as the annex on Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing, still require further negotiation. However, once ratified, the agreement will bolster global preparedness, enabling quicker responses to future pandemics and more equitable access to life-saving resources.

As health experts emphasize, the global community must invest in preparedness now to avoid the costly toll of another pandemic. “We can’t afford another pandemic, but we can afford to prevent one,” said Helen Clark, co-chair of The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness. This agreement represents a critical step toward ensuring that the world is better equipped to face future health crises with solidarity, transparency, and a commitment to equity.

Energy Policy In Cyprus: Balancing Immediate Relief With Long-Term Strategic Investment

Cyprus is facing a key moment in its energy policy, as rising electricity costs continue to put pressure on households. Constantinos Constanti, President of the Scientific and Technical Chamber (ETEK), outlined a two-track approach combining short-term relief with longer-term structural changes.

Immediate Relief Measures

Constanti said short-term measures are needed to ease pressure on consumers. This includes adjustments in the competitive electricity market to ensure that cost benefits from renewable energy projects reach households.

He pointed to modern photovoltaic parks and private storage systems, which operate at lower cost than traditional generation. Part of these gains, he argued, should be reflected in lower electricity prices, especially as consumers continue to bear the cost of broader energy investments.

Long-Term Strategic Solutions

Beyond immediate relief, Constanti highlighted the need to review how carbon costs are calculated in the wholesale electricity market. In Cyprus, carbon costs account for around 19% of the average household electricity bill, compared to an EU average of 11%. This gap points to structural issues in the system that require policy changes. He said long-term solutions will require significant public investment to address these imbalances and support a more efficient and sustainable energy system.

Enhanced Support For Vulnerable Consumers

Constanti also called for a more structured approach to supporting vulnerable households. Current support mechanisms, which rely heavily on applications and co-financing, may not reach those most in need. He suggested creating a centralised system to identify households at risk of energy poverty and prioritise targeted measures. These could include replacing energy-intensive appliances and introducing practical efficiency upgrades that reduce costs in the short term.

Transparency in how energy-related revenues are used is also key, he added. Redirecting part of these funds back to households could help reduce costs and strengthen the social impact of energy policy.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter