Opens in a new tab

Breaking news

Volkswagen’s Cost-Cutting Plan Faces Scrutiny As Traditional Methods Clash with Bold Promises

Volkswagen’s recent cost-cutting agreement, hailed as crucial for its survival amidst increasing competition and declining demand, leans heavily on the company’s longstanding tradition of collaboration between management and workers. However, this approach has sparked concerns among investors about the company’s ability to meet its ambitious targets, including reducing capacity and cutting 35,000 jobs.

The deal, which was reached just before Christmas, aims to tackle the company’s challenges, with workers and unions now engaging in discussions at factories across Germany to clarify the details. According to company sources, each plant will be given its cost-reduction target, with mixed teams of managers and labor representatives working together to devise strategies that enhance productivity. These targets will be reviewed quarterly, and if any interim milestones are missed, new negotiations may be necessary.

This method aligns with Volkswagen’s history of compromise and cooperation, but it also raises questions about its effectiveness in driving the required changes. The model avoids a top-down restructuring approach that might have been more decisive but could have led to unrest or strikes.

Investors have been left underwhelmed by the deal, with Volkswagen shares trading below the levels seen in October, before a sharp decline in quarterly profits. Analysts like Patrick Hummel from UBS believe the market needs to see concrete plans for long-term profitability, with a focus on how the cost-cutting measures will impact the company’s bottom line in the next two years.

Capacity Reductions And Plant Closures Remain Uncertain

As the deal progresses, questions persist about how Volkswagen will reduce its workforce and production capacity. Unions have been informed that the company is considering closing three to four plants, though Volkswagen has declined to confirm specific closures. The final agreement does include the closure of two factories: one in Dresden by 2025, and another in Osnabrueck by 2027. However, both sites may be repurposed for alternative uses, with potential new investors involved.

The company’s Zwickau plant, which produces electric vehicles, will lose one production line but will receive investment in a new recycling facility, which is set to begin operations in 2027. These new investments, however, are contingent on meeting cost-cutting goals, as Volkswagen’s finance chief Arno Antlitz made clear in recent comments to investors.

The company has also identified capacity reductions at its Wolfsburg headquarters, where two production lines will be cut. While Volkswagen has stated that the deal will result in savings of €15 billion over the “medium term,” investors remain uncertain about how this approach compares to the more direct route of plant closures.

Job Cuts Remain A Major Challenge

Another pressing concern is how Volkswagen will achieve its target of shedding 35,000 jobs. While the company previously promised to cut 30,000 jobs in 2016, its workforce size has remained largely stable due to new hires in other areas. The current plan to meet the target relies on not replacing retiring employees and offering voluntary early or partial retirement options. A clause in the deal guarantees jobs until 2030, a concession won by unions after Volkswagen canceled a previous job guarantee agreement in September.

Despite the uncertainties surrounding the cost-cutting plan, some analysts believe that Volkswagen’s CEO, Oliver Blume, has done well in navigating the complexities of dealing with unions and local politicians, who have significant influence over the company’s decisions. Moritz Kronenberger, portfolio manager at Union Investment, notes that although the deal may appear underwhelming, it represents deeper cuts than many had anticipated.

Blume’s leadership is under scrutiny. As Kronenberger points out, “Blume remains the right CEO, but the company’s cost structure must look very different in two years. Volkswagen needs to prove it’s ready for the future and can continue to produce attractive products.” For now, Blume’s ambitious promises have left him both vulnerable and accountable as Volkswagen seeks to secure its future in a rapidly changing industry.

Dictionary.com Names ‘Maxxing’ Its Word Of The Year For 2026

Dictionary.com has named “maxxing” its Word of the Year for 2026, reflecting a growing online trend of optimising almost every aspect of life, from health and appearance to work and leisure.

The choice follows last year’s selection of “6-7”, a phrase popularised by younger internet users. Unlike that expression, “maxxing” has spread beyond niche online communities into everyday social media language.

From “Looksmaxxing” To Mainstream Usage

Derived from “maximising”, “maxxing” describes doing something to the fullest or optimising it as much as possible. According to Dictionary.com, its roots lie in phrases such as “maxing out” a credit card and gaming terminology.

During the 2010s, the term gained traction in manosphere and incel communities through “looksmaxxing”, referring to efforts to improve physical attractiveness through fitness, grooming and, in some cases, more extreme measures.

The word later became associated with controversial manosphere influencers, including livestreamer Braden Peters, known as Clavicular, who promotes an intense focus on male appearance.

A Broader Meaning

Younger social media users have since expanded “maxxing” beyond its original associations. Searches for the term surged in August as it became a label for everything from wellness routines to workplace habits. It is also used ironically to poke fun at the pressure to constantly improve.

“Maxxing is the linguistic manifestation of a culture increasingly preoccupied with getting the most out of everything,” said Steve Johnson, director of lexicography for Dictionary Media Group at IXL Learning.

Johnson noted that the term can signal enthusiasm for self-improvement, exaggerate it for humour or reject the idea of constant optimisation altogether. Examples include “proteinmaxxing” at breakfast, “tokenmaxxing” with AI tools at work and “cozymaxxing” on a Friday night.

The Many Forms Of “Maxxing”

The term has generated numerous variations. “Softmaxxing” refers to relatively modest appearance improvements, such as a new haircut, while “hardmaxxing” describes more extreme approaches, including severe dieting or cosmetic procedures. “Jestermaxxing” involves using humour to gain social acceptance or online attention, while “sleepmaxxing” focuses on improving sleep quality or duration.

These variations show how the language of optimisation has spread across personal identity, health, social status and leisure.

The Pressure To Do More

The popularity of “maxxing” also reflects a wider tension between self-improvement and the expectation to make every activity more productive. In the workplace, “tokenmaxxing” describes employees being encouraged to use AI tools as much as possible, turning technological adoption into another measure of performance.

The term captures a culture in which ordinary activities can become opportunities for measurable gains, even as some people use the language to question that pressure.

Other Words On The Shortlist

Other candidates for Dictionary.com’s 2026 Word of the Year included “affordability”, “data center”, “odyssey” and “unc”.

Interest in “odyssey” may have been boosted by Christopher Nolan’s film The Odyssey, while “unc”, short for “uncle”, is used by Gen Z and Gen Alpha to describe someone older who is perceived as out of touch or uncool.

“Maxxing” ultimately stands out for capturing a defining online impulse: to optimise everyday life, share the process and keep striving for more.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter