Breaking news

Volkswagen’s Cost-Cutting Plan Faces Scrutiny As Traditional Methods Clash with Bold Promises

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

January 27, 2025

Volkswagen’s recent cost-cutting agreement, hailed as crucial for its survival amidst increasing competition and declining demand, leans heavily on the company’s longstanding tradition of collaboration between management and workers. However, this approach has sparked concerns among investors about the company’s ability to meet its ambitious targets, including reducing capacity and cutting 35,000 jobs.

The deal, which was reached just before Christmas, aims to tackle the company’s challenges, with workers and unions now engaging in discussions at factories across Germany to clarify the details. According to company sources, each plant will be given its cost-reduction target, with mixed teams of managers and labor representatives working together to devise strategies that enhance productivity. These targets will be reviewed quarterly, and if any interim milestones are missed, new negotiations may be necessary.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

This method aligns with Volkswagen’s history of compromise and cooperation, but it also raises questions about its effectiveness in driving the required changes. The model avoids a top-down restructuring approach that might have been more decisive but could have led to unrest or strikes.

Investors have been left underwhelmed by the deal, with Volkswagen shares trading below the levels seen in October, before a sharp decline in quarterly profits. Analysts like Patrick Hummel from UBS believe the market needs to see concrete plans for long-term profitability, with a focus on how the cost-cutting measures will impact the company’s bottom line in the next two years.

Capacity Reductions And Plant Closures Remain Uncertain

As the deal progresses, questions persist about how Volkswagen will reduce its workforce and production capacity. Unions have been informed that the company is considering closing three to four plants, though Volkswagen has declined to confirm specific closures. The final agreement does include the closure of two factories: one in Dresden by 2025, and another in Osnabrueck by 2027. However, both sites may be repurposed for alternative uses, with potential new investors involved.

The company’s Zwickau plant, which produces electric vehicles, will lose one production line but will receive investment in a new recycling facility, which is set to begin operations in 2027. These new investments, however, are contingent on meeting cost-cutting goals, as Volkswagen’s finance chief Arno Antlitz made clear in recent comments to investors.

The company has also identified capacity reductions at its Wolfsburg headquarters, where two production lines will be cut. While Volkswagen has stated that the deal will result in savings of €15 billion over the “medium term,” investors remain uncertain about how this approach compares to the more direct route of plant closures.

Job Cuts Remain A Major Challenge

Another pressing concern is how Volkswagen will achieve its target of shedding 35,000 jobs. While the company previously promised to cut 30,000 jobs in 2016, its workforce size has remained largely stable due to new hires in other areas. The current plan to meet the target relies on not replacing retiring employees and offering voluntary early or partial retirement options. A clause in the deal guarantees jobs until 2030, a concession won by unions after Volkswagen canceled a previous job guarantee agreement in September.

Despite the uncertainties surrounding the cost-cutting plan, some analysts believe that Volkswagen’s CEO, Oliver Blume, has done well in navigating the complexities of dealing with unions and local politicians, who have significant influence over the company’s decisions. Moritz Kronenberger, portfolio manager at Union Investment, notes that although the deal may appear underwhelming, it represents deeper cuts than many had anticipated.

Blume’s leadership is under scrutiny. As Kronenberger points out, “Blume remains the right CEO, but the company’s cost structure must look very different in two years. Volkswagen needs to prove it’s ready for the future and can continue to produce attractive products.” For now, Blume’s ambitious promises have left him both vulnerable and accountable as Volkswagen seeks to secure its future in a rapidly changing industry.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Central Bank Study: Cyprus Tax Reform Favors Higher-Income Households

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

July 28, 2026

Cyprus’s 2026 personal income tax reform is expected to deliver its biggest financial gains to upper-middle-income and high-income households, according to a new working paper by the Central Bank of Cyprus (CBC).

The study, Assessing the Distributional and Fiscal Impacts of Cyprus’s Personal Income Tax Reform, by economists Aris Avgousti, Charalambos Michael and Georgiana Photiadou, examines how the proposed tax changes could affect household incomes, government finances and the broader economy.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Higher Earners Benefit Most

The paper concludes that the reform will increase average disposable income and reduce personal income tax liabilities, but the gains will be unevenly distributed across income groups.

Although the Central Bank does not set tax policy, the researchers argue that tax reforms can influence monetary policy by changing household spending, saving and borrowing behaviour.

“By reallocating disposable income across households with different marginal propensities to consume, different savings behaviour and different exposure to interest rate movements, the reform may influence the strength and composition of monetary policy transmission,”
the paper said.

How The Reform Was Assessed

The analysis used EUROMOD tax-benefit microsimulations alongside confidential household data from the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) and the Household Budget Survey.

It assessed changes to income tax brackets, a new income-dependent allowance for dependent children and university students, and an income-dependent allowance for mortgage interest or rental expenses linked to primary residences. A proposed tax incentive for green capital expenditure was excluded because of data limitations.

Limited Relief For Lower-Income Households

Many lower-income households are expected to see little or no direct benefit because their taxable income was already below the previous threshold.

In 2022, 43% of taxpayers reported taxable income below the pre-reform threshold of €19,500. Households in the lowest income decile are projected to gain an average of just €5 per year, compared with €1,057 for those in the highest decile.

The largest gains are concentrated among upper-middle-income and high-income households, while middle-income groups receive more modest benefits. As a share of disposable income, gains peak at 2.9% in the ninth income decile before easing to 2% in the highest decile.

Fiscal Cost And Trade-Offs

The researchers estimate the reform will reduce government revenue by around €240 million annually, broadly in line with official projections, while reducing the number of taxpayers with positive personal income tax liabilities by around 22%.

Although the paper says the fiscal cost appears manageable given Cyprus’s budget position, it argues that alternative approaches could have reduced the concentration of benefits among higher-income households while preserving more fiscal space for social cohesion measures and productivity-enhancing investment.

Modest Economic Impact

The reform is expected to support private consumption and modestly increase consumption tax revenues, producing a limited boost to economic growth. However, the impact is likely to be constrained because a significant share of additional spending will be absorbed by imports rather than domestic production.

The paper also notes that Cyprus’s fiscal surpluses provide an opportunity to invest in productivity, public services and the green and digital transition.

Relief Comes With Distributional Trade-Offs

The authors conclude that while the reform increases disposable income and lowers personal income tax liabilities, it does little to improve income distribution.

“Achieving meaningful distributional improvements would likely require strengthening the social safety net and deploying more targeted fiscal support,”
the researchers said.

They add that higher disposable incomes should leave households better off overall, while changes in income distribution could also affect borrowing, housing demand and the transmission of monetary policy.