Breaking news

Volkswagen’s Cost-Cutting Plan Faces Scrutiny As Traditional Methods Clash with Bold Promises

Volkswagen’s recent cost-cutting agreement, hailed as crucial for its survival amidst increasing competition and declining demand, leans heavily on the company’s longstanding tradition of collaboration between management and workers. However, this approach has sparked concerns among investors about the company’s ability to meet its ambitious targets, including reducing capacity and cutting 35,000 jobs.

The deal, which was reached just before Christmas, aims to tackle the company’s challenges, with workers and unions now engaging in discussions at factories across Germany to clarify the details. According to company sources, each plant will be given its cost-reduction target, with mixed teams of managers and labor representatives working together to devise strategies that enhance productivity. These targets will be reviewed quarterly, and if any interim milestones are missed, new negotiations may be necessary.

This method aligns with Volkswagen’s history of compromise and cooperation, but it also raises questions about its effectiveness in driving the required changes. The model avoids a top-down restructuring approach that might have been more decisive but could have led to unrest or strikes.

Investors have been left underwhelmed by the deal, with Volkswagen shares trading below the levels seen in October, before a sharp decline in quarterly profits. Analysts like Patrick Hummel from UBS believe the market needs to see concrete plans for long-term profitability, with a focus on how the cost-cutting measures will impact the company’s bottom line in the next two years.

Capacity Reductions And Plant Closures Remain Uncertain

As the deal progresses, questions persist about how Volkswagen will reduce its workforce and production capacity. Unions have been informed that the company is considering closing three to four plants, though Volkswagen has declined to confirm specific closures. The final agreement does include the closure of two factories: one in Dresden by 2025, and another in Osnabrueck by 2027. However, both sites may be repurposed for alternative uses, with potential new investors involved.

The company’s Zwickau plant, which produces electric vehicles, will lose one production line but will receive investment in a new recycling facility, which is set to begin operations in 2027. These new investments, however, are contingent on meeting cost-cutting goals, as Volkswagen’s finance chief Arno Antlitz made clear in recent comments to investors.

The company has also identified capacity reductions at its Wolfsburg headquarters, where two production lines will be cut. While Volkswagen has stated that the deal will result in savings of €15 billion over the “medium term,” investors remain uncertain about how this approach compares to the more direct route of plant closures.

Job Cuts Remain A Major Challenge

Another pressing concern is how Volkswagen will achieve its target of shedding 35,000 jobs. While the company previously promised to cut 30,000 jobs in 2016, its workforce size has remained largely stable due to new hires in other areas. The current plan to meet the target relies on not replacing retiring employees and offering voluntary early or partial retirement options. A clause in the deal guarantees jobs until 2030, a concession won by unions after Volkswagen canceled a previous job guarantee agreement in September.

Despite the uncertainties surrounding the cost-cutting plan, some analysts believe that Volkswagen’s CEO, Oliver Blume, has done well in navigating the complexities of dealing with unions and local politicians, who have significant influence over the company’s decisions. Moritz Kronenberger, portfolio manager at Union Investment, notes that although the deal may appear underwhelming, it represents deeper cuts than many had anticipated.

Blume’s leadership is under scrutiny. As Kronenberger points out, “Blume remains the right CEO, but the company’s cost structure must look very different in two years. Volkswagen needs to prove it’s ready for the future and can continue to produce attractive products.” For now, Blume’s ambitious promises have left him both vulnerable and accountable as Volkswagen seeks to secure its future in a rapidly changing industry.

Mitsides Lifts First-Half Profit 14% As Margin Gains Offset Softer Sales

Mitsides Public Company Ltd posted a solid improvement in first-half profitability in 2026, with net profit rising almost 14 per cent despite a modest decline in revenue, supported by a stronger gross margin and lower financing costs.

According to the group’s interim financial statements, published on its website (Mitsides Group), profit after tax increased to €727,134 in the six months to June 30, from €640,011 a year earlier, an advance of 13.6 per cent.

Margins and Finance Costs Drive The Improvement

Turnover edged down 1.05 per cent to €18.92 million, compared with €19.12 million in the corresponding period of 2025. Mitsides, which produces and distributes flour and pasta, imports and distributes food products, trades grain and operates in Serbia through its wholly owned subsidiary Mitsides Point, nonetheless delivered stronger profitability across key lines.

The main driver was a wider gross margin, which increased to 27.96 per cent from 26.7 per cent a year earlier. Operating profit also improved, rising to €1.07 million from €1.03 million in the first half of 2025.

At the same time, selling, promotion and administrative expenses increased to €4.21 million, or 22.25 per cent of sales, from €4.03 million, or 21.08 per cent of sales, a year earlier. Even with that rise in overheads, the group benefited from lower borrowing costs, helping preserve momentum at the bottom line.

Lower Borrowing Costs Support Earnings

Net finance expenses fell 25 per cent to €163,225 from €217,775. As a result, profit before tax climbed to €902,192 from €810,508 in the comparable period of 2025. Earnings per share rose to 8.87 cents from 7.81 cents.

The company also reported an improvement in short-term liquidity. Its current ratio increased to 1.35 at the end of June from 1.25 at the end of 2025, although the quick ratio softened to 0.63 from 0.69.

Balance Sheet Strength Improves

Total assets stood at €38.01 million, down from €40.01 million at the end of December, while shareholders’ equity increased to €19.95 million from €19.23 million. Net asset value per share rose to €2.43 from €2.35.

At June 30, the group had €6.94 million in floating-rate borrowings, trade receivables of €7.75 million and bank balances of €717,088.

Growth Plans Continue Amid Geopolitical Uncertainty

Looking ahead, Mitsides said it will continue investing to expand exports while defending its position in the Cypriot market. The group also highlighted uncertainty linked to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as persistent inflationary pressures.

In Serbia, where operations are carried out through the wholly owned subsidiary Mitsides Point D.o.o., the business continued to operate against a backdrop of political and economic uncertainty. The company noted that Serbia remains committed to its European path, with the government aiming to complete the technical criteria for EU accession by the end of 2026.

The board did not recommend an interim dividend for the period. Separately, Mitsides completed payment in August of a €410,000 final dividend, equivalent to €0.05 per share, drawn from profits accumulated during the 2023 financial year.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter