Breaking news

Victoria’s Secret Dials Back DEI, Joining Growing Corporate Pushback Against Diversity Programs

In a shift that reflects a broader trend among major corporations, Victoria’s Secret is rebranding its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to focus on “inclusion and belonging,” according to a company memo obtained by Forbes. This move, aligning with recent political winds, marks the lingerie giant’s response to increasing pressure from conservative forces, including President Donald Trump’s efforts to dismantle DEI measures across the corporate landscape.

The Shift In Focus: A Changing Corporate Climate

As of March 5, Victoria’s Secret is also reconsidering its supplier diversity goals, while halting its previously committed targets for promoting Black employees. These changes are part of a broader reevaluation coming after the company’s intense focus on DEI through the 2020s. This era of investment followed a workplace harassment scandal and a public backlash over its lack of body diversity in advertising.

The move reflects a wider corporate rethinking, with companies reassessing the role of DEI programs in light of the shifting political environment. Trump’s stance has made it a key issue in his second presidential run, influencing major businesses to reconsider their DEI commitments.

A March Of Corporate Retreats

Victoria’s Secret is far from alone in re-evaluating its DEI initiatives. In February, a string of companies, from financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and State Street to entertainment giants such as Warner Bros. Discovery, made similar moves. These companies, once at the forefront of corporate social responsibility, are now scaling back or rebranding their DEI efforts.

  • Goldman Sachs removed DEI language from its annual filings, citing legal developments in the U.S.
  • Warner Bros. Discovery renamed its DEI programs to just “inclusion” and halted participation in external diversity surveys.
  • State Street, known for its “Fearless Girl” statue, dropped its diversity goals for board representation, aligning with global protocols and local laws.

These are just a few examples of how the political and legal landscape is forcing a reevaluation of corporate DEI efforts.

A Polarized Debate: Businesses Under Pressure

Some companies, like Apple, are attempting to strike a balance, acknowledging the changing legal environment while reaffirming their commitment to diversity. Apple shareholders recently rejected a proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, but CEO Tim Cook noted that adjustments may be necessary to align with evolving laws.

Meanwhile, Costco and Delta Airlines have firmly rejected calls to abandon DEI, with Costco’s shareholders overwhelmingly voting to continue the company’s commitment to inclusion. Delta’s executive vice president emphasized that diversity remains integral to their business strategy.

The Legal And Political Pushback

Much of this corporate retraction is driven by external pressure from conservative factions, particularly following Trump’s executive orders aimed at curtailing DEI initiatives in federal agencies and private companies with government contracts.

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has led efforts to curb what it calls “dangerous” DEI programs, signaling that the landscape could shift further if more businesses respond to political and legal pressures. This has led to increased scrutiny of companies that continue to maintain robust DEI frameworks, with some industry giants facing backlash for their commitment to diversity goals.

Will Corporate America Return To DEI?

While some companies are halting DEI goals, many others are doubling down, insisting that diversity remains a crucial element of business success. Companies like Deutsche Bank, Cisco, and the NFL are vocal about the ongoing business value of diversity, and Coca-Cola has even warned that abandoning DEI could harm business performance. The question remains whether the tide will fully turn in favor of a post-DEI corporate world or if those businesses that remain committed to diversity will prove that these programs aren’t just a passing trend.

As this debate unfolds, one thing is clear: corporate America is at a crossroads, and the outcome will likely shape the future of DEI programs in the years to come.

Cyprus’ Strong Youth Employment Rate Still Does Not Guarantee Early Independence

Young people in Cyprus have a relatively high employment rate, but they leave the parental home later than the EU average, according to Eurostat data.

Cypriots left home at an average age of 27 in 2025, compared with 26.3 years across the EU. At the same time, 72.3% of people aged 20 to 29 in Cyprus were employed, well above the EU average of 65.5%.

Strong Employment Does Not Mean Early Independence

Only nine countries recorded higher youth employment rates than Cyprus. Iceland led at 85.3%, followed by the Netherlands at 84%, Malta at 82.1%, Switzerland at 78.3% and Germany at 77%.

Norway recorded 76.5%, Ireland 76.1%, Denmark 74.8% and Austria 74.6%. Eurostat said countries where young people leave home earlier generally tend to have higher youth employment rates.

Southern Europe Sees Later Moves

Finland had the lowest average age for leaving the parental home at 21.4 years, followed by Denmark at 21.8 and Estonia and Lithuania at 22.7. Croatia recorded the highest average at 31.5 years, followed by Greece and Slovakia at 30.9. Spain and Italy both stood at 30.2 years.

Across the EU, the average has remained close to 26 since 2002, rising only slightly from 26.2 years in 2024 to 26.3 years in 2025.

Cyprus Labour Market Is Cooling

The figures come as Cyprus’ labor market shows some signs of easing, although demand for workers remains relatively strong by European standards.

Separate Eurostat data showed Cyprus had the EU’s largest annual decline in its job vacancy rate in the second quarter of 2026. The rate fell to 2.6% from 3.3% a year earlier, but remained above the EU average of 2.0% and the euro area average of 2.1%.

Cost Of Living Remains A Factor

Housing and other living costs can also affect how quickly young workers establish independent households. Eurostat reported that Cyprus’ household consumption price level was 89.2% of the EU average in 2025.

A relatively lower overall price level does not eliminate affordability pressures for people on modest incomes. For younger workers, the issue can be whether wages are sufficient to cover rent, utilities, food and other basic expenses.

Cyprus therefore combines relatively high youth employment with a later transition to independent living, suggesting that access to work and the ability to afford a separate household do not always move together.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter