Breaking news

Victoria’s Secret Dials Back DEI, Joining Growing Corporate Pushback Against Diversity Programs

In a shift that reflects a broader trend among major corporations, Victoria’s Secret is rebranding its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to focus on “inclusion and belonging,” according to a company memo obtained by Forbes. This move, aligning with recent political winds, marks the lingerie giant’s response to increasing pressure from conservative forces, including President Donald Trump’s efforts to dismantle DEI measures across the corporate landscape.

The Shift In Focus: A Changing Corporate Climate

As of March 5, Victoria’s Secret is also reconsidering its supplier diversity goals, while halting its previously committed targets for promoting Black employees. These changes are part of a broader reevaluation coming after the company’s intense focus on DEI through the 2020s. This era of investment followed a workplace harassment scandal and a public backlash over its lack of body diversity in advertising.

The move reflects a wider corporate rethinking, with companies reassessing the role of DEI programs in light of the shifting political environment. Trump’s stance has made it a key issue in his second presidential run, influencing major businesses to reconsider their DEI commitments.

A March Of Corporate Retreats

Victoria’s Secret is far from alone in re-evaluating its DEI initiatives. In February, a string of companies, from financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and State Street to entertainment giants such as Warner Bros. Discovery, made similar moves. These companies, once at the forefront of corporate social responsibility, are now scaling back or rebranding their DEI efforts.

  • Goldman Sachs removed DEI language from its annual filings, citing legal developments in the U.S.
  • Warner Bros. Discovery renamed its DEI programs to just “inclusion” and halted participation in external diversity surveys.
  • State Street, known for its “Fearless Girl” statue, dropped its diversity goals for board representation, aligning with global protocols and local laws.

These are just a few examples of how the political and legal landscape is forcing a reevaluation of corporate DEI efforts.

A Polarized Debate: Businesses Under Pressure

Some companies, like Apple, are attempting to strike a balance, acknowledging the changing legal environment while reaffirming their commitment to diversity. Apple shareholders recently rejected a proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, but CEO Tim Cook noted that adjustments may be necessary to align with evolving laws.

Meanwhile, Costco and Delta Airlines have firmly rejected calls to abandon DEI, with Costco’s shareholders overwhelmingly voting to continue the company’s commitment to inclusion. Delta’s executive vice president emphasized that diversity remains integral to their business strategy.

The Legal And Political Pushback

Much of this corporate retraction is driven by external pressure from conservative factions, particularly following Trump’s executive orders aimed at curtailing DEI initiatives in federal agencies and private companies with government contracts.

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has led efforts to curb what it calls “dangerous” DEI programs, signaling that the landscape could shift further if more businesses respond to political and legal pressures. This has led to increased scrutiny of companies that continue to maintain robust DEI frameworks, with some industry giants facing backlash for their commitment to diversity goals.

Will Corporate America Return To DEI?

While some companies are halting DEI goals, many others are doubling down, insisting that diversity remains a crucial element of business success. Companies like Deutsche Bank, Cisco, and the NFL are vocal about the ongoing business value of diversity, and Coca-Cola has even warned that abandoning DEI could harm business performance. The question remains whether the tide will fully turn in favor of a post-DEI corporate world or if those businesses that remain committed to diversity will prove that these programs aren’t just a passing trend.

As this debate unfolds, one thing is clear: corporate America is at a crossroads, and the outcome will likely shape the future of DEI programs in the years to come.

Electricity Authority Enacts 22% Rate Increase Amid Escalating Energy Costs

Electricity Tariff Increase Raises Concerns Among Businesses

Businesses in northern Cyprus are warning of mounting cost pressures after the electricity authority announced a 22% increase in power tariffs, set to take effect in June. The decision has sparked concern across the industrial sector, where rising energy costs are already weighing on competitiveness and operating margins.

Cost Pressures And The Need For Adjustment

According to the electricity authority, energy costs have increased significantly over the past 14 months without corresponding tariff adjustments. Officials said a smaller increase of between 10% and 15% had previously been proposed but was not approved by the council of ministers. Since then, fuel prices have risen by more than 60%, while the cost of living has increased by 38% and exchange rates by 18%. The authority argues that the latest tariff adjustment is necessary to maintain the financial sustainability of the electricity system.

Industrial Impact And The Risk Of Losing Competitiveness

KTSO President Ali Kamatzoglou said electricity remains one of the largest cost components for local manufacturers and producers. According to Kamatzoglou, industrial electricity prices currently stand at around 10 Turkish lira per kilowatt-hour, compared with approximately 3 Turkish lira in Turkey, placing businesses in northern Cyprus at a competitive disadvantage. He warned that an increase to 12.5 Turkish lira per kilowatt-hour could further weaken the sector’s competitiveness and put additional pressure on industrial activity.

Sector-Specific Concerns And Calls For Government Intervention

Concerns extend beyond manufacturing to sectors including food production, construction, cleaning products and water supply. Industry representatives estimate that around 25 producers and approximately 1,500 employees could be affected by higher electricity costs. Kamatzoglou called on the government to introduce support measures and develop a longer-term strategy to help businesses manage rising operating expenses while maintaining competitiveness.

Economic Implications

Business groups are now awaiting a response from policymakers as concerns grow over the broader economic impact of the tariff increase. Industry representatives argue that without targeted support, higher energy costs could affect production levels, investment decisions and employment across multiple sectors.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter