Breaking news

Victoria’s Secret Dials Back DEI, Joining Growing Corporate Pushback Against Diversity Programs

In a shift that reflects a broader trend among major corporations, Victoria’s Secret is rebranding its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to focus on “inclusion and belonging,” according to a company memo obtained by Forbes. This move, aligning with recent political winds, marks the lingerie giant’s response to increasing pressure from conservative forces, including President Donald Trump’s efforts to dismantle DEI measures across the corporate landscape.

The Shift In Focus: A Changing Corporate Climate

As of March 5, Victoria’s Secret is also reconsidering its supplier diversity goals, while halting its previously committed targets for promoting Black employees. These changes are part of a broader reevaluation coming after the company’s intense focus on DEI through the 2020s. This era of investment followed a workplace harassment scandal and a public backlash over its lack of body diversity in advertising.

The move reflects a wider corporate rethinking, with companies reassessing the role of DEI programs in light of the shifting political environment. Trump’s stance has made it a key issue in his second presidential run, influencing major businesses to reconsider their DEI commitments.

A March Of Corporate Retreats

Victoria’s Secret is far from alone in re-evaluating its DEI initiatives. In February, a string of companies, from financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and State Street to entertainment giants such as Warner Bros. Discovery, made similar moves. These companies, once at the forefront of corporate social responsibility, are now scaling back or rebranding their DEI efforts.

  • Goldman Sachs removed DEI language from its annual filings, citing legal developments in the U.S.
  • Warner Bros. Discovery renamed its DEI programs to just “inclusion” and halted participation in external diversity surveys.
  • State Street, known for its “Fearless Girl” statue, dropped its diversity goals for board representation, aligning with global protocols and local laws.

These are just a few examples of how the political and legal landscape is forcing a reevaluation of corporate DEI efforts.

A Polarized Debate: Businesses Under Pressure

Some companies, like Apple, are attempting to strike a balance, acknowledging the changing legal environment while reaffirming their commitment to diversity. Apple shareholders recently rejected a proposal to eliminate DEI initiatives, but CEO Tim Cook noted that adjustments may be necessary to align with evolving laws.

Meanwhile, Costco and Delta Airlines have firmly rejected calls to abandon DEI, with Costco’s shareholders overwhelmingly voting to continue the company’s commitment to inclusion. Delta’s executive vice president emphasized that diversity remains integral to their business strategy.

The Legal And Political Pushback

Much of this corporate retraction is driven by external pressure from conservative factions, particularly following Trump’s executive orders aimed at curtailing DEI initiatives in federal agencies and private companies with government contracts.

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has led efforts to curb what it calls “dangerous” DEI programs, signaling that the landscape could shift further if more businesses respond to political and legal pressures. This has led to increased scrutiny of companies that continue to maintain robust DEI frameworks, with some industry giants facing backlash for their commitment to diversity goals.

Will Corporate America Return To DEI?

While some companies are halting DEI goals, many others are doubling down, insisting that diversity remains a crucial element of business success. Companies like Deutsche Bank, Cisco, and the NFL are vocal about the ongoing business value of diversity, and Coca-Cola has even warned that abandoning DEI could harm business performance. The question remains whether the tide will fully turn in favor of a post-DEI corporate world or if those businesses that remain committed to diversity will prove that these programs aren’t just a passing trend.

As this debate unfolds, one thing is clear: corporate America is at a crossroads, and the outcome will likely shape the future of DEI programs in the years to come.

What Cyprus Can Learn From Greece And Malta’s Growth Strategies

Across the Mediterranean, countries are increasingly competing not only for tourists but also for long-term residents, investment and skilled professionals. Greece and Malta have adopted different strategies to achieve that goal, offering two models that may hold lessons for Cyprus.

The shift comes as the traditional tourism model faces growing pressure. Climate change, overtourism and the rise of remote work have exposed the limitations of economies that depend heavily on peak summer demand. Increasingly, Mediterranean countries are looking for ways to extend tourism activity into year-round economic growth.

Greece Stopped Selling Only The Summer

Greece offers one of the clearest examples of that transition. While its islands have long depended on July and August tourism, many have spent the past decade extending the season through infrastructure investment. Fibre connectivity has expanded to islands that once struggled with unreliable service, while ports have been upgraded with European recovery funding. On islands such as Naxos and Paros, the tourism season now stretches from Easter through November.

A longer season is also attracting more long-term visitors considering relocation rather than short holidays. Unlike tourists who leave after a week, residents contribute to the local economy throughout the year through housing, banking, education and everyday spending.

Athens has adjusted its policy framework accordingly. In 2024, it revised its residency-linked property investment rules, raising the investment threshold to €800,000 in high-demand areas including central Athens, Mykonos and Santorini, while maintaining a €400,000 threshold elsewhere. The objective was to redirect foreign investment toward regions with greater capacity while easing pressure on the country’s hottest property markets.

The policy has attracted attention for attempting to balance investment with concerns over housing affordability and the long-term sustainability of local communities.

Malta Turned Staying Into A Product

Malta has pursued a different strategy. Without Greece’s size or tourism volumes, it focused on attracting internationally mobile industries including financial services, iGaming and maritime registration. Competitive regulation and targeted policies helped establish the country as a base for those sectors.

The result has been a service-driven economy and one of the fastest-growing populations in the European Union, supported largely by international workers.

Alongside employment-based pathways, Malta also offers a residence programme for non-EU nationals combining a government contribution, a property purchase or long-term lease, and a philanthropic donation. Lower property thresholds in southern Malta and Gozo are intended to steer investment towards less-developed areas.

Whatever the broader debate surrounding such schemes, the policy reflects a consistent objective: converting foreign interest into long-term economic participation.

The Risks Of Success

Neither approach is without trade-offs. In Greece, Santorini has become a symbol of overtourism, with cruise arrivals placing increasing pressure on local infrastructure and prompting discussions over visitor limits. Rising demand for short-term rentals has also reduced housing availability for local residents in several destinations.

Malta faces different challenges. Rapid population growth has added pressure to infrastructure and housing, while the country has spent years rebuilding the reputation of its financial services sector following international scrutiny.

Both cases illustrate that attracting investment is only part of the equation. Managing its impact on housing, infrastructure and local communities is equally important.

What Cyprus Can Learn

Taken together, Greece and Malta demonstrate two distinct approaches to long-term economic development.

Greece is seeking to channel investment towards regions that can accommodate growth while reducing pressure on its busiest destinations. Malta has built its strategy around specialised industries, regulatory certainty and structured pathways for long-term residence.

For Cyprus, the lesson is not to replicate either model. Rather, it is to understand the trade-offs behind each approach. As competition for investment and internationally mobile residents intensifies across the Mediterranean, long-term success will depend not only on attracting people and capital, but also on ensuring growth remains sustainable for local communities.

Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter