The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched an investigation into Meta over proposed changes to its terms for news publishers, raising concerns about the use of media content and the company’s market power. Meta has postponed the changes, originally scheduled to take effect on November 20.
CMA Examines Meta’s Use Of Media Content
Under the proposed terms, Meta could access content published on news websites and use it to develop its own products, including artificial intelligence features.
Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram
Regulators will assess whether these changes impose unfair conditions on publishers and advertisers, particularly given Meta’s market position.
“We’ve heard concerns from news publishers and other businesses and are acting swiftly to investigate whether Meta’s proposed changes may breach competition law,” CMA chief executive Sarah Cardell said.
Thousands of UK businesses rely on Meta’s platforms to reach customers and audiences. Responding to the investigation, a Meta spokesperson said the company had “already committed not to change our terms without consulting publishers and other stakeholders” and welcomed the opportunity to explain its approach.
Publishers Challenge Meta Across Europe
Resistance to Meta’s approach to media content is also growing in other markets. Since May, more than 340 news websites, including those of The Guardian, The New York Times and USA Today, have blocked internet archive crawler bots over concerns that their content could be collected for AI training.
In Norway, a court temporarily barred Meta from enforcing its new terms after ten media organisations challenged the changes.
France has also taken action. The Paris Appeals Court upheld an order requiring Meta to negotiate in good faith with French publishers over payments for using their content, rejecting the company’s challenge.
Back in July, France’s competition authority said Meta’s conduct could constitute an abuse of its dominant position and ordered negotiations over neighbouring-rights payments. Publishers had complained that renewal talks had stalled while Meta continued using their content after agreements expired.
Judges also criticised Meta for providing fragmented and difficult-to-verify data on its use of media content. The DVP publishers’ association, which includes AFP, called the rulings a “major development”. Meta said it was disappointed and was considering its next steps.
A Wider Test Of Platform Power
At the heart of the dispute are questions of content rights, transparency and compensation. News organisations argue that digital platforms benefit from journalism at scale while offering limited insight into how it is used or opportunities to negotiate fair terms.
The CMA’s investigation could help clarify how competition law applies when dominant technology companies set conditions for using media content in products such as AI services.
Separately, Meta is facing scrutiny over its platform design and alleged effects on children and teenagers. The company is due to appear in a US court alongside Snap in a case concerning those claims.







