Breaking news

U.S. Creates Sovereign Wealth Fund With Potential To Acquire TikTok

In a surprising move, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to create a sovereign wealth fund within the next 12 months, which could include the acquisition of the popular short-video app TikTok. The fund’s purpose would be to manage U.S. assets and generate wealth for the nation, with Trump promising it would benefit American citizens.

The sovereign wealth fund could be structured similarly to other such funds in countries across the globe, particularly in the Middle East and Asia, which use them to make direct investments. While the executive order provided little detail on the fund’s operations, it directed the U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments to submit a comprehensive plan, including funding mechanisms and investment strategies, within 90 days.

Trump has previously expressed support for creating a government-backed investment vehicle during his presidential campaign. He envisioned it as a tool to fund key national projects such as infrastructure, manufacturing, and medical research. The fund would likely be financed through innovative sources, including tariffs, though no clear explanation has been provided yet on its structure or funding.

In contrast to typical sovereign wealth funds, which rely on a country’s budget surplus, the U.S. operates at a deficit, which makes the funding approach more complex. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized that the fund’s creation would focus on monetizing U.S. assets, particularly those on the country’s balance sheet. However, many experts believe that the creation of such a fund would require Congressional approval, as it may involve legislation to authorize new funding sources.

The possibility of the fund purchasing TikTok has drawn significant attention. Trump suggested that the fund might acquire the social media platform, which has around 170 million U.S. users, after its ownership by Chinese company ByteDance became a subject of national security concerns. A law mandating ByteDance to sell its U.S. assets or face a ban took effect in January, but Trump has delayed its enforcement by 75 days, citing ongoing negotiations. Trump stated that if a suitable deal could be reached, TikTok would potentially become part of the sovereign wealth fund. However, he also indicated that this was not a certainty, leaving the decision still to be made.

This announcement follows reports that the Biden administration had also explored the idea of establishing a similar fund. However, as Trump’s plan unfolds, it remains uncertain whether it will materialize within the expected timeframe. Sovereign wealth funds manage over $8 trillion globally, and with this new initiative, the U.S. could join the ranks of nations leveraging such funds for national investment purposes.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter