Breaking news

Trust in Scientists: A Global And Cypriot Perspective On Public Confidence

A recent global study, covering 68 countries including Cyprus and Greece, sheds light on the high levels of public trust in scientists and the widespread desire for their increased involvement in shaping societal and policy decisions. Published in Nature Human Behaviors, the research surveyed 71,922 individuals, offering the most detailed snapshot of global trust in scientists since the COVID-19 pandemic. The average global trust rating was 3.62 out of 5, reflecting a generally positive perception of scientists, though regional differences exist:

Countries With the Highest Trust

Egypt tops the list with a score of 4.30, followed by India, Nigeria, Kenya, and Australia.

Countries With the Lowest Trust

At the bottom, Albania ranked lowest with a score of 3.05, closely followed by Ethiopia, Russia, Bolivia, and Kazakhstan.

Greece And Cyprus

Greece ranks 56th with a trust rating of 3.39, just below the global average, while Cyprus follows closely with a slightly higher score of 3.42, placing 52nd in the global rankings.

The findings suggest that a significant portion of the public views scientists as competent (78%), honest (57%), and concerned about the welfare of society (56%). Furthermore, the study reveals that 75% of respondents agree that scientific methods are the most reliable means of discovering truth. More than half of the participants (52%) also believe that scientists should have a more direct role in policymaking.

Key Areas For Scientific Research Focus

The survey indicates that the public wants scientific efforts to concentrate on:

  • Enhancing public health
  • Addressing energy challenges
  • Alleviating poverty

On the other hand, there is a clear reluctance to prioritize military and defense technology, with many participants feeling that current research in these areas is overemphasized.

While trust in scientists remains strong, only 42% of respondents believe scientists actively consider public opinions. Additionally, 83% of participants called for improved communication between the scientific community and the public, as many feel that scientific priorities don’t always reflect societal needs.

Anthropic’s Opus 5.5 Arrives With Lower Costs, Faster Performance And Sharper Safety Guardrails

Anthropic on Tuesday unveiled Opus 5.5, its latest flagship model and, by the company’s account, a new state of the art in coding and knowledge work.

Opus remains the top tier in Anthropic’s three-model Claude family, positioned above Sonnet and Haiku, which serve the middle and entry-level segments respectively. The company says the new release not only outperforms the larger Fable model on several benchmarks, but also completed a number of informal tasks that Fable could not finish.

A More Efficient Frontier Model

One of the most notable changes is economic, not just technical. Anthropic says output tokens for Opus 5.5 will be priced at $20 per million, down from $25 for the previous version. Other usage metrics have also declined, and the model is faster to run, reflecting lower compute requirements to serve it.

That matters because model economics are increasingly central to enterprise adoption. In practice, a more capable model is only part of the equation; speed and cost often determine whether it can be deployed at scale across software development, research, customer operations, and internal knowledge workflows.

Sharper Communication, Less Jargon

Anthropic says the update also changes how Opus communicates. The new model is less likely to lean on jargon and more likely to lead with the most important information first. For business users, that is more than a stylistic adjustment. It improves readability, reduces friction in decision-making, and makes AI output easier to use in executive settings where time is scarce and clarity matters.

A Rapid Follow-Up To Opus 5

The launch comes just two months after the debut of Opus 5 on July 24. Anthropic said Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5, the next models in the lineup, will follow “in the coming weeks,” with similar performance gains expected.

Safety Remains Central To The Release

Anthropic says Opus 5.5 is comparable to Mythos in biology and cybersecurity capabilities, which means the model is subject to the same safeguards as the company’s Fable model. Those restrictions limit the model’s use in areas such as discovering exploits in compiled programs or developing recognizable biological weapons, among other sensitive tasks.

The release is also notable because it is Anthropic’s first since CEO Dario Amodei publicly embraced calls to pace the frontier, a strategy designed to slow the rate of capability gains so alignment and safety measures can catch up. In a recent post, Amodei wrote: “I have become convinced that fully addressing the risks requires even more prudence, not just investing in risk prevention, but pacing the rate of capabilities advancement so that risk prevention has time to keep up.”

Preparing The Next Layer Of Oversight

Anthropic said Opus 5.5 underwent safety training broadly similar to earlier models, including alignment testing and pre-release evaluation by external groups such as METR and Frontier Design. At the same time, the company said it is already building more advanced training and evaluation systems for future releases, including stronger security and monitoring infrastructure.

“As AI becomes more capable, public policy should play a larger role in making sure the systems people rely on are safe,” the company wrote in its announcement. “That capacity takes time to build, and we’ve started to put the infrastructure in place to support it. We expect to share more details on these efforts soon.”

Uol
eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter