Trump Executive Order Centralizes Federal Oversight of Artificial Intelligence

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

December 12, 2025

Federal Preemption in AI Regulation

In a landmark move, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at establishing a unified national regulatory framework for artificial intelligence. This decisive action is designed to supplant a mosaic of state-level regulations in favor of a federal standard, thereby enabling U.S. AI companies to innovate unimpeded by what the order describes as “cumbersome regulation.”

Balancing Innovation and National Competitiveness

The executive order reflects growing concerns that disparate state policies could hamper the nation’s ability to compete globally in the fast-evolving AI industry. By centralizing authority, the Trump administration seeks to prevent influential states such as California and New York from imposing stringent controls that could stifle innovation and favor alternative regulatory models abroad.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Political and Industry Alliances

The decision, bolstered by the influence of AI and crypto advisor David Sacks and tech investor Chamath Palihapitiya, underscores the administration’s alignment with key industry stakeholders. The order was signed in the Oval Office in the company of Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, signaling bipartisan support for a federal first approach to AI policy.

Impact on Tech Giants and Market Dynamics

Major tech companies, including OpenAI and Google, along with venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz, have long lobbied for federal oversight that minimizes regulatory fragmentation. This orientation is reinforced by significant investments in political campaigns, including a super PAC with over $100 million earmarked for the 2026 midterm elections, highlighting the intricate ties between technology and policy-making.

Enforcing Federal Supremacy Over State Rules

In addition to streamlining AI regulations, the order mandates the appointment of an AI Litigation Task Force led by the Attorney General. This body will be charged with challenging state regulations deemed to be obstacles to federal AI policy. Moreover, states diverging from the new framework could face restrictions on funding from the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program—a $42.5 billion initiative to expand high-speed internet services in rural communities.

Looking Ahead

This policy shift represents a strategic effort to harmonize AI regulation at the national level, thereby bolstering the United States’ competitive posture in the global technology arena. By reducing regulatory discrepancies, the executive order aims to create an environment where innovation can flourish without the hindrance of a patchwork of state laws.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Cyprus Income Distribution 2024: An In-Depth Breakdown of Economic Classes

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

December 24, 2025

New findings from the Cyprus Statistical Service offer a comprehensive analysis of the nation’s income stratification in 2024. The report, titled Population By Income Class, provides critical insights into the proportions of the population that fall within the middle, upper, and lower income brackets, as well as those at risk of poverty.

Income Distribution Overview

The data for 2024 show that 64.6% of the population falls within the middle income class – a modest increase from 63% in 2011. However, it is noteworthy that the range for this class begins at a comparatively low threshold of €15,501. Meanwhile, 27.8% of the population continues to reside in the lower income bracket (a figure largely unchanged from 27.7% in 2011), with nearly 14.6% of these individuals identified as at risk of poverty. The upper income class accounted for 7.6% of the population, a slight decline from 9.1% in 2011.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Income Brackets And Their Thresholds

According to the report, the median equivalent disposable national income reached €20,666 in 2024. The upper limit of the lower income class was established at €15,500, and the threshold for poverty risk was set at €12,400. The middle income category spans from €15,501 to €41,332, while any household earning over €41,333 is classified in the upper income class. The median equivalents for each group were reported at €12,271 for the lower, €23,517 for the middle, and €51,316 for the upper income classes.

Methodological Insights And Comparative Findings

Employing the methodology recommended by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the report defines the middle income class as households earning between 75% and 200% of the national median income. In contrast, incomes exceeding 200% of the median classify households as upper income, while those earning below 75% fall into the lower income category.

Detailed Findings Across Income Segments

Upper Income Class: Comprising 73,055 individuals (7.6% of the population), this group had a median equivalent disposable income of €51,136. Notably, the share of individuals in this category has contracted since 2011.
Upper Middle Income Segment: This subgroup includes 112,694 people (11.7% of the population) with a median income of €34,961. Combined with the upper income class, they represent 185,749 individuals.
Middle Income Group: Encompassing 30.3% of the population (approximately 294,624 individuals), this segment reports a median disposable income of €24,975.
Lower Middle And Lower Income Classes: The lower middle income category includes 22.2% of the population (211,768 individuals) with a median income of €17,800, while the lower income class accounts for 27.8% (267,557 individuals) with a median income of €12,271.

Payment Behaviors And Economic Implications

The report also examines how income levels influence repayment behavior for primary residence loans or rental payments. Historically, households in the lower income class have experienced the greatest delays. In 2024, 27.0% of those in the lower income bracket were late on payments—a significant improvement from 34.6% in 2011. For the middle income class, late payments were observed in 9.9% of cases, down from 21.4% in 2011. Among the upper income class, only 3% experienced delays, compared to 9.9% previously.

This detailed analysis underscores shifts in income distribution and repayment behavior across Cyprus, reflecting broader economic trends that are critical for policymakers and investors to consider as they navigate the evolving financial landscape.

Breaking news