Breaking news

TikTok’s Uncertain Future: What A US Ban Means For Social Media And Advertising

TikTok is once again on the chopping block. With in-app purchase (IAP) revenue still 20% below pre-ban levels, the platform is struggling to regain momentum. As its parent company, ByteDance, faces an April 5 deadline to either sell TikTok’s U.S. operations or risk delisting, the stakes couldn’t be higher.

The January Delisting: A Case Study In Disruption

Earlier this year, TikTok went offline in the U.S. ahead of the original January 19 deadline, only to be reinstated after an eleventh-hour extension. The brief outage offered a glimpse into what a permanent ban could mean for the digital ecosystem—particularly for advertisers, competitors, and user engagement.

Instagram’s Gain, TikTok’s Loss

When TikTok disappeared from app stores for 24 days, competitors saw a surge in downloads. Instagram installations spiked by 21%, while the broader short-form video market grew by 7%. Since TikTok’s reinstatement, its downloads have rebounded sharply, surging 82% over the past six weeks.

Engagement Shifts: Meta, Reddit, And X Capitalize

Time spent on TikTok took a 4% hit during the delisting period. Meanwhile, engagement on rival platforms, including Instagram, Reddit, and X, each rose by 4%. With TikTok’s status in flux, users began exploring alternatives—an opportunity competitors were quick to seize.

Revenue Realignment: YouTube And X See Gains

TikTok’s U.S. monetization strategy heavily relies on in-app purchases, generating $1.7 billion annually. But during the delisting period, YouTube’s IAP revenue jumped 9%, while X saw an 8% increase. This trend suggests that users—and their spending habits—can be redirected if TikTok faces further disruptions.

Meta Absorbs TikTok’s Advertising Dollars

Despite TikTok’s meteoric rise as a preferred advertising platform, uncertainty is prompting brands to shift their budgets. Eight of the ten largest advertising categories on TikTok reduced their U.S. social media ad spend in early 2025 compared to 2024. Meta emerged as the biggest beneficiary, drawing ad dollars from companies seeking stability.

Major brands such as Coca-Cola, Walmart, Google, and Amazon have increased their spend on TikTok in Q1 2025, but others—like Target, Procter & Gamble, and Disney—have scaled back. This realignment underscores the volatile nature of TikTok’s position in the U.S. market.

The Road Ahead

As the April 5 deadline approaches, the future of TikTok in the U.S. remains uncertain. Whether through a forced sale, another extension, or an outright ban, the platform’s ongoing legal and regulatory battles will continue to shape the social media landscape. One thing is clear—TikTok’s turbulence is creating opportunities for its biggest competitors.

Corporate Restructuring Underway: Deutsche Bank And Procter & Gamble Navigate Global Pressures

Global financial institutions and consumer goods leaders are actively reengineering their strategies to address complex economic challenges. Recent announcements from Deutsche Bank and Procter & Gamble exemplify broad-based efforts to improve operational efficiency and respond dynamically to market pressures.

Deutsche Bank’s Strategic Workforce Optimization

At its Consumer Conference in Paris, Deutsche Bank unveiled a restructuring program that includes reducing its non-manufacturing workforce by approximately 15%. Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten underscored that while the initiative is critical for ensuring long-term operational resilience over the next two to three years, it does not fully neutralize the near-term challenges the bank faces.

Procter & Gamble’s Market Adjustments

Amidst these industry shifts, Procter & Gamble, which maintained a workforce of roughly 108,000 employees worldwide as of June 2024, is also recalibrating its approach. In addition to streamlining its product portfolio by ending sales of certain items in specific markets, the company is preparing to disclose further details in an upcoming announcement.

Tariff Impacts And Supply Chain Considerations

Further complicating matters, Procter & Gamble acknowledged that tariffs affecting raw materials, packaging supplies, and some finished goods sourced from China have intensified cost pressures. In response, the firm is exploring alternative sourcing strategies and productivity enhancements, though it may ultimately be forced to adjust pricing on select products. This sentiment is echoed by the Consumer Brands Association, which recently reported that even companies manufacturing domestically now contend with tariffs on critical imported ingredients amidst growing domestic scarcity.

Industry Implications And Outlook

The dual strategies adopted by Deutsche Bank and Procter & Gamble underscore a broader trend of recalibration in response to global tariff dynamics, supply chain disruptions, and evolving market demands. As these companies strive to reinforce their long-term business models, industry stakeholders will be keenly observing the outcomes of these significant restructuring efforts.

SWC Finals V
Uri Levine Course vertical
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter