The U.S. House Passes Speed Act To Accelerate AI Infrastructure Development

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

December 19, 2025

The U.S. House of Representatives has approved the SPEED Act, a pivotal legislative measure designed to streamline federal permitting for the development of critical data centers powering artificial intelligence projects. The bill, which emerged from a nearly contentious vote of 221-196, seeks to reengineer outdated regulatory frameworks to better position American technology firms in the global race for AI supremacy.

Modernizing Permitting Processes

The SPEED Act proposes significant reforms to the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by drastically reducing the review and litigation periods. Provisions include shrinking the statute of limitations for NEPA-related litigation to 150 days—drastically shorter than the existing six-year window—and tightening review timelines. Such measures aim to expedite the federal approval process for new AI data centers and clean energy projects alike, offering a critical boost to sectors reliant on swift infrastructure deployment.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Strengthening U.S. Competitiveness In AI

Backed by major technology players including OpenAI, Micron, and Microsoft, the bill is seen as an essential tool in helping the United States maintain its competitive edge against global rivals, notably China. Proponents argue that enhanced permitting efficiency is not just a bureaucratic improvement, but a strategic move to ensure that sufficient electricity and modern infrastructure are available to support both civilian and military AI computing demands. As Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Arkansas), the bill’s sponsor and chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, noted, “The electricity we will need to power AI computing for civilian and military use is a national imperative.”

Bipartisan Debate And The Renewable Energy Dilemma

While the bill garnered support from several influential legislators, it also sparked significant bipartisan debate. Democratic cosponsor Rep. Jared Golden of Maine characterized the measure as a necessary step to ensure the nation remains agile enough to undertake essential infrastructure projects. However, many Democrats have expressed concerns that the legislation—as amended by GOP leadership to exempt certain executive actions on renewable projects—could undermine efforts to promote clean energy. Critics such as Rep. Scott Peters (D-California) have stressed the need for a balanced approach that reforms the permitting system without retroactively validating controversial policies from the previous administration.

The Road Ahead

With the bill now moving to the Senate, both sides are expected to engage in further negotiations that could result in a more bipartisan framework for permitting reform. This debate is set against the backdrop of intensifying pressures on the nation’s power grid and the burgeoning demands of a rapidly evolving tech sector. Should the Senate endorse a compatible version of the legislation, the reform could serve as a fundamental component in the United States’ broader strategy to lead the global wave of AI innovation while concurrently facilitating the energy transition.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

by News Editor

June 25, 2026

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

Breaking news