Breaking news

The Nobel Prize in Economics goes to prosperity researchers

Darren Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson received this year’s Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for their contributions to proving the importance of public institutions to a country’s prosperity.

KEY FACTS

  • The prestigious prize, officially known as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize for Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, is the last prize awarded this year and is worth SEK 11 million ($1.1 million).
  • This year’s laureates showed that one of the explanations for differences in countries’ prosperity is the social institutions introduced during European colonization. Inclusive institutions were often introduced in countries that were poor at the time of colonization, which over time led to general prosperity for the population. This is an important reason why former colonies that were once rich are now poor and vice versa.
  • Introducing inclusive institutions would create long-term benefits for everyone, but extractive institutions provide short-term gains for those in power. As long as the political system ensures they retain their control, no one will trust their promises of future economic reforms. According to the laureates, this is the reason why there is no improvement.
  • “Reducing the huge income gaps between countries is one of the greatest challenges of our time. The laureates have demonstrated the importance of public institutions in achieving this,” said Jakob Svensson, Chairman of the Economic Sciences Prize Committee.
  • “Societies with poor rule of law and institutions that exploit the population do not generate growth or change for the better,” the prize’s organizers add on their website.

TANGENT

Darren Acemoglu and Simon Johnson work at MIT, while James Robinson is at the University of Chicago.

Acemoglu and Johnson recently collaborated on a book researching technology through the ages that demonstrates how some technological advances are better at creating jobs and spreading wealth than others.

KEY STORY

The Economics Prize is not one of the original science, literature and peace prizes created by the will of dynamite inventor and businessman Alfred Nobel and first awarded in 1901, but is a later additional prize established and funded by the Central Bank of Sweden in 1968.

Past recipients of the award include a number of influential thinkers such as Milton Friedman, and John Nash – played by actor Russell Crowe in the 2001 film A Beautiful Mind, and former US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Last year, Harvard economic historian Claudia Goldin won a prize for her work highlighting the causes of pay and labor market inequality between men and women.

Apple’s Camera AirPods May Be Less Creepy Than They Sound

Apple’s reported camera-equipped AirPods are raising privacy concerns, but the technology may be designed more for AI assistance than recording people.

Cameras For Siri, Not Recording

Leaked footage from a macOS 26.7 release candidate reportedly shows a person wearing AirPods while asking Siri about a book. The video, discovered by researcher Aaron Perris, includes a reference to Visual Intelligence, suggesting the cameras could help Siri understand what users are looking at.

Code found in the software also reportedly includes a “Hair Detected” warning, indicating that the cameras are positioned on the earbuds and need an unobstructed view.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, the cameras would not be designed to take photos or record video. Instead, they would capture low-resolution visual information to help Siri respond to what the user sees.

What Could Users Do With Them?

The technology could have practical uses, from identifying objects and ingredients to providing directions while walking through an unfamiliar city. It also fits into Apple’s broader push to make AI available without requiring users to constantly reach for an iPhone.

Privacy Could Still Be A Problem

Reports suggest the AirPods would include an LED indicator showing when visual information is being shared with the cloud. While that would improve transparency, the small indicator may not be enough to reassure people who are uncomfortable around camera-equipped wearables.

That puts Apple in a difficult position. The company can control how the cameras function, but it has much less control over what people assume they are doing.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter