Breaking news

The $100 Billion Gamble: Microsoft, OpenAI, And The Race For AGI

Microsoft and OpenAI are chasing a colossal prize: artificial general intelligence (AGI) capable of generating $100 billion in profit. It’s a staggering figure that’s shaping their partnership and defining what success looks like for both companies. But while this business-driven metric sets a clear target, it’s a far cry from the philosophical vision of AGI—an AI that can outperform humans in most economically valuable tasks.

The Reality Check

Here’s the kicker: OpenAI is nowhere near hitting that financial goal. The company is burning through billions, with losses expected to continue until at least 2029. And the financial strain is only one piece of the puzzle.

OpenAI’s dependence on Microsoft, which has poured billions into the startup, has come at a cost. The exclusive deal requires OpenAI to rely heavily on Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure. While this partnership has fueled OpenAI’s rapid growth, it’s also created friction.

Friends Or Frenemies?

Sam Altman has described the partnership with Microsoft as “the best friendship in tech,” but cracks are showing. OpenAI has been renegotiating terms to gain more flexibility, including the ability to buy computing power from Oracle. These changes signal a growing desire to ease the pressure of being tied too closely to a single partner.

At the heart of this partnership is a fascinating clause: if OpenAI achieves AGI, Microsoft loses access to the technology. This safeguard is meant to prevent misuse of AGI, but it also raises the stakes. The closer OpenAI gets to AGI, the more complicated this “friendship” could become.

The Cost Of Ambition

OpenAI’s expenses are jaw-dropping. By the end of 2024, the company will have spent at least $5.4 billion on computing power alone, with annual costs expected to skyrocket to $37.5 billion by 2029. Despite this, the startup is betting big on its future, exploring partnerships with heavyweights like Apple, Nvidia, and MGX to diversify its support system.

What’s Next?

The $100 billion target isn’t just a financial goal—it’s a litmus test for whether OpenAI can achieve the kind of scale and impact that AGI promises. But AGI remains a distant dream, and until then, OpenAI will continue walking a tightrope: innovating at breakneck speed while managing the weight of its partnership with Microsoft.

For now, the tech world is watching closely, because this isn’t just a story about a company—it’s a story about the future of intelligence itself.

China’s Humanoid Robot Boom Faces A Bigger Question: Can These Machines Make Money?

Unitree’s $9 Billion Bet On The Future Of Robotics

China’s humanoid robotics industry is attracting huge investor interest, but as Unitree Robotics prepares for its public debut, questions are growing over whether its robots can move beyond impressive acrobatics and become commercially viable tools.

The Hangzhou-based startup priced its IPO at 150.8 yuan ($22.4) per share, raising $900 million and valuing the company at 61 billion yuan, or about $9 billion. The offering attracted record retail demand on Shanghai’s STAR Market, with the online tranche oversubscribed more than 5,000 times and a winning rate of just 0.018%. Strategic investors included AI startup DeepSeek.

A Unitree-linked pre-IPO perpetual contract was trading at roughly four times the IPO price on Friday, highlighting the speculative interest surrounding the company.

Unitree is known for robots capable of kung fu kicks, backflips and recovering from falls. Yet analysts question whether the technology is ready for large-scale commercial use. “For these humanoid robots, to be honest, they’re fascinating. They can dance and all that, but I’ve never seen them doing any real housework,” said Hao Hong, managing partner of Lotus Asset Management.

In its prospectus, Unitree warned that mass adoption could take longer than expected because robotic hands are still not precise or durable enough for sustained use.

From Acrobatic Robots To Commercial Machines

Even advanced humanoid robots can currently perform only a limited number of tasks and typically operate for a few hours before recharging, according to Dominik Pross, an equity analyst at VP Bank. Most models run for up to four hours, while robots also need to be trained for individual tasks.

“Robots have to be specifically trained for each and every task entrusted to them, even the simplest,” Pross said.

More robotics listings are expected, with Unitree rivals AgiBot and Leju Robotics seeking listings in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. LimX Dynamics founder Will Zhang said last month that “listing is a must.”

China’s Cost Advantage

China’s manufacturing scale has helped it establish a leading position in robotics. Wood Mackenzie expects the global humanoid robot fleet to surpass 10 million units by 2035, while China already accounts for more than 70% of global industrial robot installations and nearly 90% of humanoids deployed last year.

Average humanoid robot prices fell 93% between 2020 and 2025 to $58,000. Unitree’s flagship G1 costs $16,000, while SemiAnalysis estimates that the company has cut the price of its G1 EDU model by more than 45% to $27,300, while maintaining a 67% gross margin.

Falling prices and government support are attracting investment, but analysts say it will take time to prove that humanoid robots can generate strong returns. Unitree’s revenue more than quadrupled last year, although adjusted first-quarter profit fell more than 52% as research and development and marketing spending increased. Nearly three-quarters of its humanoid revenue in the first nine months of 2025 came from research and education, highlighting the gap between demonstrations and widespread commercial use.

“Unlike many early-stage robotics companies, the Unitree story is backed by real revenue growth,” said Jeff Ko, chief analyst at CoinEx. Still, he noted that its $9 billion valuation, at more than 200 times last year’s earnings, reflects significant speculative interest.

Geopolitical Risks

Unitree’s IPO momentum has continued despite growing pressure on Chinese robotics companies. The U.S. moved last month to ban imports of foreign-made humanoid and four-legged robots, potentially exposing Unitree, which generated about 13% of its revenue from the U.S. last year.

Access to Nvidia hardware and software is another risk, as Chinese robotics companies rely on the technology to power their systems. “Chinese robot producers are not yet in a position to do without Western components completely,” Pross said.

China’s control over rare earths used in robot actuators and motors could nevertheless give its manufacturers an advantage, according to Bernstein analyst Dien Wang.

The Bigger Robotics Opportunity

The potential market is attracting major players, including Tesla, whose CEO Elon Musk is expanding production plans for Optimus humanoid robots. At the same time, some researchers argue that the future of robotics will not be limited to humanoids: quadruped and purpose-built robots can be cheaper and more reliable for repetitive industrial tasks, while humanoids may be better suited to unpredictable environments.

For Unitree, the challenge is no longer proving that its robots can perform impressive tricks. It is proving that they can do enough useful work to justify a $9 billion valuation.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter