Breaking news

Tesla’s Market Rollercoaster: Examining The 91% Surge Wipeout

In a surprising move, Tesla stock prices have dropped below their values recorded prior to the November elections that saw Donald Trump rise to victory. This has led to a dramatic 91% growth revocation, positioning Tesla as a strong indicator of the current financial market’s steep decline.

Key Figures And Market Reaction

  • Shares plunged by over 15%, landing at $222—their lowest close since October 23, two weeks ahead of the election.
  • This marks Tesla’s largest percentage drop since September 2020, with Monday being its seventh worst trading day in 15 years, according to FactSet.
  • Broader economic concerns regarding Trump’s policies fueled losses, as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite entered a correction territory with a 4% decline.
  • UBS analysis puts further pressure predicting a 5% decline in Tesla’s vehicle deliveries for 2025—contrasting a market forecasted 12% rise.
  • Tesla’s shares linger 53% beneath their December peak, a time when anticipation for Trump’s supportive policies had buoyed prices.

The Financial Implications

Elon Musk, Tesla’s top shareholder, has witnessed his net worth plummet by $145 billion since reaching $464 billion in December. Nevertheless, Musk’s wealth still surpasses that of any other individual globally by approximately $110 billion, despite the $23 billion loss he endured on Monday due to falling Tesla shares.

Root Causes And Market Influence

Tesla’s market capitalization saw a dramatic decrease of nearly $800 billion from its December pinnacle as its shares slipped 12% post-election day. Musk’s contribution of $288 million to Trump’s campaign efforts is notable as he assumes his role within the government-created department, aiming to streamline expenses and cut governmental staff.

Trade tariffs, positioned by Trump, nearly cripple Tesla as it relies heavily on its second-largest market, China, and parts from Canada, China, and Mexico. This, along with noticeably declining sales early in 2025 across Europe and China, creates a dim sentiment around Tesla, noted by analysts who criticize Musk’s public political stances as damaging to Tesla’s image.

Electric Vehicle Leaders Urge EU To Maintain 2035 Zero Emission Mandate

Industry Voices Emphasize the Importance of Commitment

Over 150 key figures from Europe’s electric car sector, including executives from Volvo Cars and Polestar, have signed a letter urging the European Union to adhere to its ambitious 2035 zero emission goal for cars and vans. These industry leaders warn that any deviation could hamper the progress of Europe’s burgeoning EV market, inadvertently strengthen global competitors, and weaken investor confidence.

Evolving Perspectives Within the Automotive Community

This call comes in the wake of a contrasting appeal issued at the end of August by heads of European automobile manufacturers’ and automotive suppliers’ associations. That letter, endorsed by the CEO of Mercedes-Benz, Ola Kaellenius, argued that a 100 percent emission reduction target may no longer be practical for cars by 2035.

Discussion With EU Leadership on The Horizon

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is scheduled to meet with automotive industry leaders on September 12 to deliberate the future of the sector. Facing stiff challenges such as the rise of Chinese competition and the implications of US tariffs, the stakes for the EU’s policy decisions have never been higher.

Potential Risks of Eroding Ambitious Targets

Industry leaders like Michael Lohscheller, CEO of Polestar, caution that any weakening of the targets could undermine climate objectives and compromise Europe’s competitive edge in the global market. Michiel Langzaal, chief executive of EU charging provider Fastned, further highlighted that investments in charging infrastructure and software development are predicated on the certainty of these targets.

Regulatory Compliance And The Mercedes-Benz Exception

A report from transport research and campaign group T&E indicates that nearly all European carmakers, with the exception of Mercedes-Benz, are positioned to meet CO₂ regulation requirements for the 2025-2027 period. To avoid potential penalties, Mercedes must now explore cooperation with partners such as Volvo Cars and Polestar.

Conclusion

The industry’s unified stance underscores the critical balance between environmental aspirations and maintaining competitive advantage. With high-level discussions imminent, the EU’s forthcoming decisions will be pivotal in shaping not only the future of the continent’s automotive sector but also its global positioning in the race towards sustainable mobility.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter