Breaking news

Tech Giants Push Back Against Europe’s AI Crackdown

As Europe tightens its grip on artificial intelligence, US tech giants are mounting a fierce resistance. Industry leaders at Google and Meta warn that the European Union’s stringent AI regulations are stifling innovation, preventing local companies from competing on a global scale, and slowing the rollout of cutting-edge AI products to consumers.

Regulatory Roadblocks: Innovation Vs. Compliance

At the recent Techarena conference in Stockholm, executives from Meta and DeepMind took the stage to criticize the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act. Meta’s Director of Public Policy, Chris Yiu, and DeepMind’s Head of Public Policy, Dorothy Chow, argued that Europe’s regulatory framework, introduced before the rise of generative AI, is out of sync with the technology’s rapid evolution.

A prime example of this friction is Meta’s AI-powered Ray-Ban smart glasses, designed to translate speech in real time and assist visually impaired users. While these features were rolled out in other regions, regulatory hurdles forced Meta to delay their European launch. The company cited the need to navigate the “complex regulatory system” before making AI capabilities available to consumers.

According to Chow, the core issue is that the AI Act was initially proposed in April 2021—more than a year before OpenAI’s ChatGPT reshaped the AI landscape in late 2022. This lag between policy and technological advancement, critics argue, puts European firms at a competitive disadvantage.

Growing Opposition From Tech And Government Leaders

US tech companies aren’t alone in their frustration. Venture capitalists backing European AI startups also voice concerns that strict regulations could deter investment and push innovation offshore. Antoine Moiro, partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners—an investor in French AI unicorn Mistral—urged European policymakers to shift their focus “beyond GDPR and the AI Act” and instead create an environment that fosters success stories in AI.

The pushback is gaining momentum at the highest levels. At the recent AI Action Summit in Paris, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance criticized Europe’s heavy-handed regulation, arguing that a restrictive approach risks slowing AI adoption and ceding technological leadership to competitors like the U.S. and China.

The Battle For AI Leadership

Brussels aims to position the EU as the global hub for “trusted AI,” but critics say its cautious stance may backfire. While the U.S. is pumping billions into AI initiatives like the $500 billion Stargate project, Europe risks falling behind by focusing more on compliance than competition.

With tech giants, venture capitalists, and policymakers now clashing over AI’s future, the debate over innovation versus regulation is only intensifying. The question remains: Can Europe balance safety and progress without stifling the very innovation it seeks to lead?

Cyprus Crypto Users Face New Risks As MiCA Rules Take Effect

Why Investors Need To Check The Company Behind Their Crypto Platform

Crypto users in Cyprus are being urged to verify exactly which company holds their assets after the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) transition period ended on July 1, 2026.

MiCA rules for crypto-asset service providers have applied since December 2024, but Cyprus allowed companies operating under its previous national framework to continue temporarily. CySEC required providers wishing to remain in the market to apply by February 27, 2026.

The end of the transition means that appearing on an old national register is no longer enough. Investors must check the specific legal entity providing the service and the activities it is authorised to perform.

Two Regulatory Routes

CySEC maintains separate registers for providers authorised under Article 63 and companies using the Article 60 notification route.

The lists should not simply be treated as a count of licensed crypto exchanges. Providers have different regulatory statuses and may be authorised for different services, including custody, transfers, exchanges or operating trading platforms.

Companies authorised elsewhere in the EU can also serve Cypriot customers through MiCA passporting. Investors should therefore check the wider ESMA register.

Familiar Brands Can Still Be Used In Scams

MiCA authorisation applies to a specific legal entity, not automatically to every website, subsidiary or service using the same brand. Fraudsters can copy a legitimate company’s name, logo and licence number while changing its website or payment details.

The regulatory transition creates another opportunity for scammers. They can imitate legitimate notices about account closures or transfers and claim that customers must urgently move their assets to a new “regulated” platform.

In its July announcement, CySEC warned that customers using unauthorised providers do not receive MiCA protections and advised investors to verify providers through ESMA.

A Wider European Shake-Up

The changes affect the broader European crypto market. VASPnet estimated that more than 1,700 unlicensed crypto companies could face closure, relocation or restructuring after the transition period.

ESMA’s register contained 323 authorised providers at the end of July, while TRM Labs identified 1,343 operating providers in the European Economic Area on July 1, including 281 with MiCA authorisation. The different figures reflect different methodologies, but point to a substantial number of providers operating without the new authorisation.

ESMA instructed unauthorised companies to stop accepting new EU customers, opening accounts and marketing their services, while allowing limited activity needed for an orderly withdrawal.

What Investors Should Check

MiCA introduces common requirements for areas such as governance, disclosures and safeguarding client assets, but it does not make crypto investments risk-free.

For Cyprus users, the key questions are which legal entity provides the service, what it is authorised to do and whether the website or contact details are genuine.

Requests to transfer assets urgently, pay recovery fees, reveal private keys or install remote-access software should be treated as red flags. MiCA may bring greater clarity to the market, but the transition has also created a new opportunity for criminals to exploit a very real regulatory change.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter