Breaking news

Tax Authority Imposes Stricter Compliance Measures for Property Transfers

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

November 28, 2025

Under Strict Terms, Mandatory Tax Compliance Is Now a Prerequisite for Property Sales

The Tax Authority has announced that property transfers will be halted if either party remains noncompliant with their filing obligations or outstanding tax liabilities. This new measure, embedded in the legislative package of tax reform, is currently under review by the Parliamentary Finance Committee.

Legislative Framework and Strategic Adjustments

The reform package includes provisions under the Capital Gains Tax bill that empower the Tax Authority to withhold the transfer of real estate when either the seller or the buyer fails to meet their tax obligations, with the exception of disposal transactions. Officials, including Tax Official Sotiris Markidis, have indicated that the implementation will incorporate legal safeguards and transitional measures to ensure clarity and smooth adoption of the law.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Enhancing Fiscal Discipline and Market Stability

This regulation is poised to reinforce the discipline of the Tax Department over time by embedding a culture of fiscal compliance. By linking property transfers to tax conformity, the policy compels taxpayers to regularly submit income declarations and settle their dues, whether voluntarily or out of necessity.

Mitigating Market Disruptions With Phased Implementation

While market disruption in the real estate sector is anticipated upon the initial activation of this provision, the Tax Authority is preparing contextual safeguards. A tailored formula, soon to be presented to the Finance Committee, aims to balance enforcement with protection for buyers. The formula details exceptions for cases such as taxpayers engaged in legal disputes over tax arrears or those participating in agreed instalment plans. In these cases, outstanding liabilities may be temporarily regarded as settled until further legal review.

One-Year Grace Period for Taxpayers

Additionally, a one-year grace period has been introduced, allowing taxpayers to reconcile their tax obligations before these restrictions take full effect. Under this provision, the law’s enforcement on property transfer will be deferred until January 1, 2027, rather than the originally proposed 2026. During 2026, taxpayers will have the opportunity to file overdue returns and clear any tax arrears.

Rolling Out a Gradual Enforcement Timeline

For transactions exceeding €100,000, the phased implementation is designed to provide clarity and protect stakeholders:

From January 1, 2027, the Tax Authority may block transfers for tax arrears exceeding €1 million.
Starting January 1, 2028, the threshold will be reduced to €500,000.
Effective January 1, 2029, transfers can be halted for arrears up to €200,000.
From January 1, 2030, the limit will be set at €50,000.
Beginning January 1, 2031, the cap will be lowered to €10,000.

It is important to note that for primary residences with tax liabilities up to €500,000, these restrictions will not apply, ensuring continued access to essential housing.

Conclusion

The Tax Authority’s new measures signal a pivotal shift towards stricter fiscal compliance and refined market regulations. By ensuring that all property transactions are underpinned by robust tax compliance, the government aims to foster a disciplined tax culture while mitigating abrupt disruptions in the real estate market.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

EU Regulation May Undermine Its AI Ambitions, Warns U.S. Ambassador

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

March 30, 2026

Regulatory Stringency Threatens Europe’s Future In AI

Andrew Puzder said EU regulatory pressure on U.S. technology companies could affect Europe’s access to AI infrastructure. He said access to data centers, data resources and hardware remains linked to U.S.-based providers.

Balancing Oversight And Global Technological Competitiveness

Puzder’s remarks arrive amid a period of aggressive regulatory measures undertaken by the European Commission against major U.S. tech companies. According to Puzder, imposing excessive fines and constantly shifting regulatory goals may force these companies to retreat from the EU market, leaving the continent on the sidelines of the AI revolution. He noted, “If you regulate them off the continent, you’re not going to be a part of the AI economy.”

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

U.S. Concerns Over Regulatory Overreach

Critics from across the Atlantic, including figures from former U.S. administrations, have repeatedly lambasted the EU’s stringent policies. Puzder stressed that without a conducive business environment supported by robust U.S. technology infrastructures, Europe’s ambitions in AI might remain unrealized. The warning carries significant implications for transatlantic trade relations and the future integration of technology across borders.

Specific Cases: Impact On Major Tech Companies

Recent EU enforcement actions include fines and regulatory decisions affecting major U.S. technology companies operating in the region. Meta was subject to regulatory action following policy-related concerns. Apple received a €500 million penalty, while Google was fined €2.95 billion in an antitrust case. X, owned by Elon Musk, was also fined €120 million in recent months. Marco Rubio criticized these measures, citing concerns about their impact on U.S. technology companies.

Implications For The Global AI Landscape

EU regulators are also reviewing the compliance of platforms such as Snap Inc. under the Digital Services Act. Focus includes areas such as user protection and platform responsibility. Discussion reflects ongoing differences between EU and U.S. approaches to regulation and innovation. Further developments will depend on policy decisions on both sides.