Breaking news

Systemic Barriers Persist for Women in Cyprus, Says Commissioner

Achieving gender equality in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) is essential for the resilience and progress of society, Gender Equality Commissioner Josie Christodoulou said during Cyta’s ‘Women in STEAM’ conference on Tuesday.

Speaking at the event, Christodoulou pointed to the persistent challenges faced by women in Cyprus and across Europe, despite the crucial role STEAM sectors play in shaping innovation and economic competitiveness.

According to the ‘SHE Figures 2024’ report, women account for 42 per cent of the self-employed in Cyprus working in science, engineering, and information technology. However, only 14 per cent hold higher research degrees.

Moreover, just 25 per cent of board members in research organisations are women, while female inventors account for only 10 per cent of patents filed.

Christodoulou said these figures do not reflect a lack of ability or ambition but rather point to the impact of social stereotypes, unconscious bias, and structural barriers that continue to limit access, advancement, and leadership opportunities for women in these fields.

She referred to the so-called ‘glass ceilings’ and ‘sticky floors’ that hinder women’s career progression and stressed the need for better reconciliation between work, family, and personal life.

“The presence of women in STEAM is not only a matter of justice,” she said.

It enhances scientific output, strengthens innovation, and supports more ethical and socially responsible technological development.”

Christodoulou gave the example of algorithm design, noting that a lack of diversity in development teams often results in technologies that reinforce existing biases.

She also made special mention of the historical contribution of women to technology, from the women who worked as ‘human computers’ during World War II to the codebreakers of Bletchley Park, many of whom, she said, were never properly recognised.

She underlined the importance of female representation in leadership roles, noting that “the visibility of women in high-ranking positions strengthens ambition and breaks down stereotypes,” particularly for younger generations.

According to the Commissioner, the Cyprus government has already taken steps to address these challenges. These include the extension of maternity and paternity leave, the development of care structures for children and the elderly, and the training of professional counsellors to help challenge gender-based stereotypes.

She also referred to the annual ‘HerStory’ campaign, which highlights the achievements of women working in male-dominated sectors such as shipping and diplomacy.

Christodoulou called for closer cooperation between the state, the private sector, social partners, and civil society.

She pointed to existing collaborations with the scientific and technical chamber (Etek) and the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Keve), and announced an upcoming memorandum of cooperation (MoC) with the Federation of employers and industrialists (OEV).

She concluded by saying that promoting gender equality and building inclusive work environments “is a strategic choice for economic progress and social sustainability.”

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter