Breaking news

Social Media Ban For Under-16s Gains Global Momentum

Australia’s recent enforcement of a social media ban for individuals under 16 has captured international attention, prompting global debates on digital safety and youth mental health. As governments evaluate similar policy measures, industry leaders and regulators are reassessing the role of social media in children’s lives.

Australia’s Bold Regulatory Move

The Australian government’s Online Safety Amendment Act—implemented on December 10—affects major platforms including Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), Meta (owner of Instagram), Alphabet (YouTube), and Bytedance’s TikTok. The law mandates stringent age verification processes, with non-compliant companies facing fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (roughly $32 million).

Global Repercussions And Policy Debates

While the immediate reactions among teenagers, tech giants, and experts are mixed, several nations are already exploring analogous restrictions. Daisy Greenwell, co-founder of the U.K.-based Smartphone Free Childhood campaign, emphasizes that governments are under mounting pressure to safeguard the mental wellbeing of children. Countries such as France, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Greece are among those considering similar age-related bans.

Legislative Momentum In The U.K.

In the U.K., momentum is building as calls intensify for a social media ban for under-16s. The House of Lords is on the cusp of voting to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to incorporate these restrictions. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has endorsed the measure, asserting the necessity of enhanced protections for children amid growing concerns over excessive screen time.

Industry Resistance And Future Prospects

Not surprisingly, tech companies have been quick to respond. Reddit has initiated legal proceedings, arguing that the law undermines political discussion online. Meanwhile, Meta has appealed to the Australian government for a reexamination of the policy—highlighting the considerable challenges that regulators face in balancing innovation with consumer protection.

Looking Ahead

Experts like Ravi Iyer, Managing Director at the USC Marshall School’s Neely Center, suggest that while a nationwide ban in markets such as the United States remains unlikely in the near term, state-level interventions may soon follow. The overarching goal of these policies is to diminish peer pressure among teens to engage with social media, thereby fostering healthier social environments.

If these legislative shifts take hold, they could mark a transformative moment in the regulation of digital platforms worldwide—ensuring that technological advancement does not come at the expense of our youngest generations.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter