Breaking news

Social Media Ban For Under-16s Gains Global Momentum

Australia’s recent enforcement of a social media ban for individuals under 16 has captured international attention, prompting global debates on digital safety and youth mental health. As governments evaluate similar policy measures, industry leaders and regulators are reassessing the role of social media in children’s lives.

Australia’s Bold Regulatory Move

The Australian government’s Online Safety Amendment Act—implemented on December 10—affects major platforms including Reddit, X (formerly Twitter), Meta (owner of Instagram), Alphabet (YouTube), and Bytedance’s TikTok. The law mandates stringent age verification processes, with non-compliant companies facing fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (roughly $32 million).

Global Repercussions And Policy Debates

While the immediate reactions among teenagers, tech giants, and experts are mixed, several nations are already exploring analogous restrictions. Daisy Greenwell, co-founder of the U.K.-based Smartphone Free Childhood campaign, emphasizes that governments are under mounting pressure to safeguard the mental wellbeing of children. Countries such as France, Denmark, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Greece are among those considering similar age-related bans.

Legislative Momentum In The U.K.

In the U.K., momentum is building as calls intensify for a social media ban for under-16s. The House of Lords is on the cusp of voting to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to incorporate these restrictions. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has endorsed the measure, asserting the necessity of enhanced protections for children amid growing concerns over excessive screen time.

Industry Resistance And Future Prospects

Not surprisingly, tech companies have been quick to respond. Reddit has initiated legal proceedings, arguing that the law undermines political discussion online. Meanwhile, Meta has appealed to the Australian government for a reexamination of the policy—highlighting the considerable challenges that regulators face in balancing innovation with consumer protection.

Looking Ahead

Experts like Ravi Iyer, Managing Director at the USC Marshall School’s Neely Center, suggest that while a nationwide ban in markets such as the United States remains unlikely in the near term, state-level interventions may soon follow. The overarching goal of these policies is to diminish peer pressure among teens to engage with social media, thereby fostering healthier social environments.

If these legislative shifts take hold, they could mark a transformative moment in the regulation of digital platforms worldwide—ensuring that technological advancement does not come at the expense of our youngest generations.

Iran-Linked Hackers Shut Down U.K. Power Plant For Four Days

A small U.K. power plant was taken offline for four days in July after a cyberattack reportedly linked to hackers tied to Iran, according to The Telegraph. The incident was not considered a threat to the wider U.K. energy system, according to the government.

U.K. Government Declines To Assign Blame

A government spokesperson declined to identify the facility or confirm who was behind the attack. The government said the incident affected a small-scale generator and did not threaten the wider energy system.

“The U.K. has a highly resilient energy system. We work closely with the energy sector to protect infrastructure and ensure the highest security standards,” the spokesperson told CNBC.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said it had briefed energy executives and written to companies about further measures. The department is also updating cybersecurity regulations for the energy sector.

U.S. Agencies Warned Of Iranian Cyber Activity

The reported attack came as U.S. authorities warned that Iranian cyber actors were targeting critical infrastructure. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, FBI, Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies said Iranian actors had targeted water facilities across at least seven U.S. states.

U.S. officials have also warned that Iranian cyber groups could target businesses and infrastructure in response to the conflict between the U.S., Israel and Iran.

On Aug. 18, the U.S. Department of Justice charged 17 Iranians over what it described as a “massive cyber theft campaign” carried out on behalf of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other Iranian entities.

Iran Has Also Faced Cyberattacks

Iran has also been targeted by major cyberattacks. In June, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic said hackers stole more than $90 million from Nobitex, Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange.

According to Elliptic, the funds were moved from Nobitex wallets to addresses containing messages referencing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The pro-Israel hacking group Gonjeshke Darande, also known as Predatory Sparrow, claimed responsibility for the attack.

The reported U.K. incident adds to a series of cyberattacks involving critical infrastructure and state-linked actors. Energy companies and other infrastructure operators are facing growing pressure to strengthen defenses as cyber operations become increasingly tied to geopolitical conflicts.

Aretilaw firm
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter