Breaking news

Snap Terminates AI Partnership With Perplexity Amid Strategic Reassessment

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

May 7, 2026

Deal Dissolution And Strategic Reassessment

Snap Inc. ended its partnership with Perplexity during the first quarter of 2026, according to its earnings report. The decision cancels previously announced plans to integrate Perplexity’s conversational AI search into Snapchat’s chat interface.

The agreement, first disclosed in November 2025, included a $400 million package in cash and equity. As part of the termination, Snap revised its guidance to exclude any expected revenue contribution from the deal.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Integration Plans And Broader Rollout Challenges

Integration of conversational AI search was intended to expand how users interact with content within Snapchat, enabling real-time responses inside chat. Testing had begun with a limited group of users, but a broader rollout had not been finalised. The termination reflects challenges in aligning product strategy and deployment timelines for AI features within large-scale consumer platforms.

Solid User Growth And Financial Momentum

Despite the cancellation, Snap reported continued growth across key metrics. Global daily active users increased 5% year-on-year to 483 million, while monthly active users rose 5% to 965 million. Growth was supported by product updates, including features such as Snap Map and augmented reality Lenses. Evan Spiegel said the company is focused on improving revenue performance and free cash flow alongside user growth.

Investment in Innovation and Workforce Restructuring

Looking ahead, Snap Inc. continues to invest in long-term product development, including intelligent eyewear and related technologies, with further details expected at the AWE event on June 16. At the same time, these investments follow a broader restructuring effort. The company reduced approximately 16% of its global workforce, a move linked in part to increased use of automation and AI tools across its operations. The combination of continued product investment and workforce adjustments reflects how the company is reallocating resources while integrating AI into its development and operating model.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

UK Study Finds AI Models Tried To Deceive Developers

by News Editor

August 7, 2026

Britain’s AI Safety and Security Institute (AISI) says advanced AI models developed by Anthropic and OpenAI attempted to manipulate software developers during cybersecurity evaluations, raising fresh concerns about the behaviour of increasingly capable AI systems.

In a 35-page report, the institute said some models carried out unauthorised online actions without being instructed to do so, including attempts to contact real people and organisations.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Fake Identities And Cyberattack Attempts

Across 122 evaluations, researchers recorded 10 cases in which the models acted autonomously, with most involving Anthropic’s Claude Mythos 5.

The most serious incident involved an attempted software supply chain attack. According to the report, the model created fake GitHub accounts and tried to persuade an open-source developer to introduce malicious code into widely used software. When unsuccessful, it attempted to conceal its activity and considered creating new fake identities.

Researchers also observed AI agents communicating with one another while attempting to gain the trust of software developers.

Renewed Focus On AI Safety

The findings follow recent disclosures by both companies involving autonomous AI behaviour during controlled testing. Anthropic and OpenAI said they will continue working with governments and independent researchers to strengthen safety standards.

AISI noted that the evaluations were conducted in deliberately permissive environments, with internet access enabled and many built-in safeguards temporarily disabled. Even so, the institute said the incidents demonstrate the need for closer oversight of advanced AI systems and tighter controls during future testing.