Breaking news

Should UK Tech Look East Or West?

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

March 24, 2025

The UK faces a strategic crossroads in its tech industry: should it align more closely with the US or Europe? While the British government touts its desire to act as a bridge between these two global powers, critics argue that such a position is more symbolic than financially impactful. The real opportunity for the UK lies in becoming a destination in its own right—a node, not just a connection.

The UK’s Tech Potential

Over the past two decades, the UK has emerged as a top global destination for tech innovation. With a strong research and development base, world-class talent, and a mature venture capital ecosystem, Britain has become home to over 750 VC-backed companies that generate $25 million or more in revenue. This vibrant tech scene contributes to the overall dynamism of the UK economy, making the country an attractive location for tech investment.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

In October, the UK’s Council for Science and Technology outlined five key recommendations to further enhance the country’s appeal as a hub for innovation: mobilizing pension fund assets for growth capital, improving connections between private and public markets, developing specialist skills, enhancing public sector support for innovation, and building greater awareness of the UK’s strengths as an investment destination.

Government Support And Its Limitations

Despite the government’s efforts—such as the AI Opportunities Action Plan and ongoing discussions about restructuring the pension fund sector—support for tech innovation remains secondary to concerns about wealth inequality. The concentration of tech success in prosperous cities like London doesn’t align directly with government priorities to improve living standards in less affluent regions. This discrepancy helps explain recent tax changes that have frustrated the tech sector.

The Dilemma: US Or Europe?

A key question has emerged for the UK: should it focus on becoming more like the US or Europe in terms of tech? Some believe this dilemma has become more urgent due to the unpredictable nature of US politics, especially under the Trump administration. The UK is deeply dependent on US tech firms and VCs for both technology and capital, which has influenced its foreign policy and tech regulations. At the same time, post-Brexit, its connections with Europe have weakened, although European tech entrepreneurs still view the UK as an appealing place to start a business, albeit less attractive than before.

A Path Forward: Looking Inward

Rather than choosing between East or west, the UK should focus on simplifying regulations for startups, incentivizing entrepreneurship, and increasing growth capital. The country remains a talent magnet, and its VC sector is still dominant in Europe. By creating an environment that fosters innovation and attracts international founders, the UK can continue to grow its tech sector, benefiting from the influx of global tech talent, including potential “refugees” from uncertain political climates like the US.

Ultimately, a thriving economy built on tech innovation will benefit everyone. The UK should position itself as a leader in fostering that innovation, drawing from both US and European strengths while charting its course.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

EU Moderates Emissions While Sustaining Economic Momentum

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

November 15, 2025

The European Union witnessed a modest decline in greenhouse gas emissions in the second quarter of 2025, as reported by Eurostat. Emissions across the EU registered at 772 million tonnes of CO₂-equivalents, marking a 0.4 percent reduction from 775 million tonnes in the same period of 2024. Concurrently, the EU’s gross domestic product rose by 1.3 percent, reinforcing the ongoing decoupling between economic growth and environmental impact.

Sector-By-Sector Performance

Within the broader statistics on emissions by economic activity, the energy sector—specifically electricity, gas, steam, and air conditioning supply—experienced the most significant drop, declining by 2.9 percent. In comparison, the manufacturing sector and transportation and storage both achieved a 0.4 percent reduction. However, household emissions bucked the trend, increasing by 1.0 percent over the same period.

National Highlights And Notable Exceptions

Among EU member states, 12 reported a reduction in emissions, while 14 saw increases, and Estonia’s figures remained static. Notably, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and Finland recorded the most pronounced declines at 8.6 percent, 5.9 percent, and 4.2 percent respectively. Of the 12 countries reducing emissions, three—Finland, Germany, and Luxembourg—also experienced a contraction in GDP growth.

Dual Achievement: Environmental And Economic Goals

In an encouraging development, nine member states, including Cyprus, managed to lower their emissions while maintaining economic expansion. This dual achievement—reducing environmental impact while fostering economic activity—is a trend that has increasingly influenced EU climate policies. Other nations that successfully balanced these outcomes include Austria, Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovenia, and Sweden.

Conclusion

As the EU continues to navigate its climate commitments, these quarterly insights underscore a gradual yet significant shift toward balancing emissions reductions with robust economic growth. The evolving landscape highlights the critical need for sustainable strategies that not only mitigate environmental risks but also invigorate economic resilience.