Breaking news

Shocking Discovery: Microplastics in Our Brains – Is This Linked to Dementia?

Every day, we unknowingly ingest and inhale microscopic plastic particles, called microplastics. These tiny fragments, less than five millimeters in size, are found everywhere – from our food to the air we breathe. While their full impact on human health is still unclear, the presence of microplastics in vital organs like the liver, kidneys, and, now, the brain, raises serious concerns.

Microplastics: What Are They?

Microplastics come in two main forms: primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are intentionally manufactured for products like cosmetics, detergents, and paints. These account for around 30% of the microplastics in the environment. Secondary microplastics, making up about 70%, form when larger plastic objects break down, such as bottles, bags, and straws. Over time, these fragments enter our bodies through ingestion and inhalation.

The Groundbreaking Study

A recent study, published in Nature Medicine, has drawn a startling connection between microplastics and dementia. Conducted by researchers at the University of New Mexico, the study analyzed post-mortem brain samples from 52 people – 28 from 2016 and 24 from 2024. Their findings were striking: microplastic levels in the brain had increased by 50% over the past eight years.

Even more concerning, microplastic levels in the brain were higher than in other organs, such as the liver and kidneys. Researchers found that among the 12 individuals diagnosed with dementia, microplastic concentrations were notably higher than in those without the condition.

Could Microplastics Cause Dementia?

While the research is still in its early stages, the possibility that microplastics may contribute to cognitive decline is unsettling. Experts like Dr. Popi Kanari, a leading chemist, caution that we need more specialized studies to confirm whether the presence of these particles in the brain is linked to diseases like dementia. However, given that microplastics are foreign substances in our bodies, their accumulation in the brain raises significant health questions.

Microplastics In Our Food And Water

This alarming trend isn’t limited to the brain. Microplastics have been detected in food, drinks, and even the air. A 2024 study revealed that 90% of animal and plant protein samples tested positive for microplastics. A separate study found that every 100 grams of rice consumed contains 3 to 4 milligrams of microplastics. Even Himalayan salt, once thought to be pure, is contaminated with microplastic particles.

The Global Response

The growing body of evidence has sparked international concern. The European Commission, in response to mounting scientific findings, has taken action to limit the use of microplastics. In 2023, they banned 78 types of microplastics and pushed for more stringent regulations. Efforts are also underway to reduce industrial microplastic use, which currently amounts to 145,000 tons annually. Yet, despite these measures, 42,000 tons still find their way into the environment each year.

Conclusion: A Looming Crisis

As research continues, the link between microplastics and health risks like dementia becomes harder to ignore. The urgent question remains: What can be done to prevent these tiny particles from entering our bodies in the first place? Until more definitive answers come, one thing is clear – microplastics are becoming an inescapable part of our lives, and their long-term impact on our health is a mystery we cannot afford to ignore.

IMF Warns Tokenisation Could Create New Financial Stability Risks

The International Monetary Fund has warned that tokenised finance could make the global financial system more efficient and resilient or introduce new vulnerabilities, depending on how regulators respond.

More Than A Technological Upgrade

Tokenisation is often presented as a faster and cheaper way to move money and assets. The IMF argues its impact could be far broader. By moving financial assets and liabilities onto shared digital ledgers, tokenisation could reshape market structures, redistribute risk and require regulators to rethink how financial systems are supervised.

In traditional markets, execution, clearing and settlement take place sequentially through multiple intermediaries. Tokenised systems can combine those functions into a single software-driven process, allowing transactions to be executed, transferred and settled almost simultaneously.

While that could improve efficiency, it would also shift where risk is concentrated. Instead of remaining primarily with banks, brokers and investment funds, risk could increasingly move to the digital platforms and infrastructure providers operating tokenised markets.

Speed Brings Efficiency And Exposure

Faster settlement, lower transaction costs and programmable assets are among tokenisation’s key advantages. However, the IMF warns that the same features could remove safeguards built into the current financial system.

Delays in settlement, reconciliation and liquidity management create costs, but they also give financial institutions time to detect errors, absorb shocks and respond during periods of market stress. Tokenised finance compresses those timelines.

As a result, liquidity pressures could emerge immediately, collateral calls could be triggered automatically, and disruptions could spread more quickly than firms or regulators can respond. Markets may become more efficient, but also more continuous, more automated and potentially less resilient during periods of stress.

The Battle Over Settlement Assets

One of the IMF’s main concerns is the future of settlement assets, the money used to complete financial transactions. While central bank money remains the safest settlement asset, tokenisation introduces several digital alternatives.

Tokenised bank deposits would largely fit within existing regulatory frameworks and could improve liquidity management through programmable, simultaneous settlement. However, continuous settlement would leave banks with less time to respond to unexpected disruptions, increasing the need for real-time liquidity support.

Stablecoins offer programmability and global reach, but their reliability depends on the quality of their reserves and the resilience of their issuers. Even fully backed stablecoins have come under pressure during periods of market stress.

Tokenised central bank reserves would eliminate credit risk from the settlement asset itself, but would also require central banks to operate or oversee new programmable infrastructure, expanding their role beyond traditional payment systems.

Banks Will Not Disappear, But Their Role Will Change

The IMF expects tokenisation to reshape rather than replace banks. Tokenised deposits could combine payments, settlement and treasury operations on shared ledgers, while tokenised lending could automate interest calculations, collateral management and risk controls through smart contracts.

In capital markets, tokenised securities could integrate issuance, trading, settlement, custody and compliance into a single workflow, reducing counterparty risk and speeding up processing. However, automated margin calls and redemption mechanisms could amplify stress during periods of market disruption.

Concentration Creates A New Systemic Risk

Shared permissioned ledgers could reduce fragmentation by consolidating activity on fewer platforms, making operational resilience, cybersecurity and governance increasingly important.

If digital infrastructure becomes central to market activity, operational failures could become systemic risks. The IMF also stresses that interoperability between platforms will be critical to prevent liquidity from becoming trapped across separate systems.

Regulation Must Move Into The Code

The IMF says tokenisation will require regulators to oversee not only financial institutions but also the software executing transactions. Smart contracts could become critical market infrastructure, increasing the need for transparency, governance and oversight.

Legal certainty will also be essential. Market participants must know whether tokenised records represent legal ownership, when settlement becomes final and which jurisdiction applies to cross-border transactions.

Why Emerging Markets Face A Bigger Trade-Off

For emerging and developing economies, tokenisation could improve cross-border payments, broaden market access and modernise settlement systems.

However, faster-moving tokenised assets could also accelerate capital flight, currency substitution and pressure on monetary sovereignty, particularly if privately issued global stablecoins become widely used for payments. The IMF says domestic regulation should remain the first line of defence, supported by international coordination.

The Policy Choices Will Determine The Outcome

The IMF says tokenisation is neither inherently beneficial nor inherently risky. Its impact will depend on the regulatory, legal and operational frameworks governing it.

According to the fund, the most resilient model combines private-sector innovation with risk-free settlement assets, clear legal frameworks and internationally coordinated oversight.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter