Shadow Fleet Accounts For Majority Of Strait Of Hormuz Transits

Strategic Transits Under Siege

A tanker operated by Greece-based Dynacom Tankers Management exited the Middle East Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting limited activity among conventional oil carriers in the region. Transit volumes remain low as geopolitical tensions continue to affect shipping flows through one of the world’s key energy routes.

Mainstream Vs. Shadow Fleet Dynamics

Data from Lloyd’s List Intelligence show that the Malta-flagged suezmax Marathi arrived in India’s Gulf of Kutch on March 26. The vessel had previously transited the strait on February 28 and loaded 1 million barrels of crude from Ras Tanura. Marathi became the 10th non-shadow fleet tanker to exit the strait since March 8, indicating reduced activity among traditional operators.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Control And Revenue Through The ‘Tehran Toll Booth’

Shipping data indicate that part of the traffic is being routed near Iranian-controlled waters around Larak Island. Industry sources describe this route as increasingly influenced by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Reports suggest some operators have faced pressure to comply with local conditions, including financial demands, although details vary across sources.

Dynacom’s Navigation Through Uncertain Waters

George Prokopiou said the transit was completed without payment and credited the crew’s actions. Another Dynacom vessel, Pola, has also completed passages through the area, reflecting continued operations despite elevated risks.

Broader Implications For Global Energy Supply

Around 20% of global oil shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz, making disruptions in the area significant for energy markets. Some vessels have reduced tracking visibility or adjusted routes, while activity linked to non-traditional fleets has increased.

Conclusion

Ongoing tensions in the region continue to affect shipping through key maritime routes. Activity by conventional tanker operators remains limited, while alternative fleets play a larger role in current transit flows. These conditions introduce operational risks and uncertainty for energy transport. Market participants continue to monitor developments that may affect supply flows and pricing.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Meta’s $18 Billion Settlement Limits State Claims Over Children’s Data

by News Editor

August 28, 2026

Meta’s $18 billion settlement with attorneys general from 29 U.S. states includes a provision limiting future state claims over the company’s use of children’s data for age-assurance systems.

Under the agreement, Meta must develop, train and begin testing a system to identify users under 13 within a year of the settlement taking effect. The company already uses AI-based age-detection tools, although the agreement does not require the new system to use AI.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

States Agree To Limits On Future Claims

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) generally restricts the collection and retention of personal data from children under 13. Under the settlement, the 29 state attorneys general agreed not to bring past, present or future claims under COPPA or similar state laws over the specified use of children’s data.

Meta will not be permitted to use information from users under 13 for advertising, marketing or algorithmic optimisation.

Federal Enforcement Remains Unclear

COPPA is primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which is not a party to the agreement. That leaves open the possibility of separate federal action over how Meta collects or uses children’s data.

Another issue is whether Meta can keep age-assurance data isolated from its other systems. An independent auditor will monitor compliance, but the settlement does not fully specify what data Meta can retain for training, how long it can be stored or whether derived insights can be used elsewhere.

Legal Risks Remain

Joshua Wurtzel, a partner at Schlam Stone & Dolan, said states could still pursue claims if Meta uses the data outside the settlement’s limits. Such cases could depend on how those limits are interpreted.

Peter Jackson, a data and intellectual property attorney at Greenberg Glusker, said the provision could “disincentivize future enforcement actions.”

The agreement gives Meta greater legal certainty around using children’s data for age assurance, but questions remain over federal enforcement, data retention and secondary use.

Breaking news