Breaking news

Parliament Reviews Revisions To Personal Income Tax Reliefs Amid Calls For Comprehensive Reform

Parliamentary Debates Over Tax Reform on the Horizon

The legislature is currently evaluating changes to the tax deductions applicable to individual income tax filers. During a recent session of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, which focused on a broad legislative package for tax reform, multiple stakeholders—including trade unions and affiliated organizations—urged modifications. Lawmakers have called on the executive branch to consider these proposals, warning that parties may advance amendments through legislative motions if their concerns remain unaddressed.

Proposed Adjustments To Allowances And Deductions

Under the draft legislation, the tax-exempt threshold is slated to rise uniformly from €19,500 to €20,500. Additionally, further tax deductions would be introduced for cases where the combined annual income of spouses or cohabitants is capped at €80,000, raised to €100,000 for multi-child households, and fixed at €40,000 for single filers. A deduction of €1,000 is proposed for every child, student, or home energy upgrade, with an elevated benefit of €2,000 for families with multiple children. Furthermore, an interest deduction of €1,500 is offered for qualifying mortgage loans.

Credit Versus Deduction: A Matter Of Administrative Efficiency

A representative from SELK testified before the Finance Committee, endorsing support for individual taxpayers yet cautioning against channeling assistance solely through the tax deduction mechanism. The suggestion was made to replace deductions with tax credits, which would directly reduce the payable tax rather than merely lowering taxable income. This shift could substantially cut down on the administrative burden associated with implementing complex deduction schemes. Meanwhile, a representative of the Bar Association expressed concerns about ambiguities related to capping deductions when individuals receive other state benefits such as allowances or subsidies.

Concerns From Multi-Child Families And Labor Organizations

Representatives of the multi-child families’ association voiced serious reservations about the income thresholds that currently determine eligibility for tax relief. They argued that it is inequitable for larger families—for instance, one with eight children—to be constrained by an income limit of €100,000, while other families are subjected to a limit of €80,000. Furthermore, they called for provisions allowing for the transferability of deductions in single-income multi-child households, mirroring the allowances provided to single-parent families.

Advocacy For Scalable Relief And Fiscal Prudence

Stakeholders have also stressed that tax deductions should be structured on a sliding scale, increasing with the number of children and students. The PASYDY representative favored issuing a tax credit ranging from €200 to €250 per child rather than further deductions, arguing that deductions would impose an unnecessary administrative cost on the state. Additionally, proposals from the PEO recommended an incremental increase in the income threshold by €5,000 for each dependent beyond three children, while suggestions from the SEK call for further enhancements of the tax-exempt threshold to €22,000 and higher benefits for home loan interest and energy upgrades.

Fiscal Impact And Technical Evaluations

Experts from the Centre for Economic Research at the University of Cyprus have evaluated the potential fiscal impact. Without considering the number of dependents or income, the cost could reach approximately €30 million. However, if the income threshold is applied on a sliding scale, the cost estimates drop dramatically to around €3 million. In contrast, unrestricted implementation of all deductions might lead to a fiscal burden of up to €100 million.

Input From The Tax Authority And Banking Sector

Sotiris Markidis, representing the Tax Office, reiterated the position of Finance Minister Makis Keravnos, expressing openness to increasing the income limit for additional benefits from €80,000 to €90,000. Markidis noted that proposals from various unions and political parties would be forwarded to the minister for further review. Acknowledging the inherent complexity of the proposed system for individual taxpayers, he emphasized that any additional measures would only add layers of complexity, though he dismissed concerns over the marginal fiscal impact on families with numerous children.

Disparate Views Among Tax Professionals And Financial Institutions

On another front, SELK has raised objections regarding several technical issues, including the proposed increase in the corporate tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, the extension of loss carryforward periods from 5 to 7 years, and potential abuses related to deductions for interest on loans used for acquiring shares in wholly-owned subsidiaries. These concerns have been echoed by legal professionals. In the coming days, the Tax Department is slated to engage with the Insurance Companies Association to reach a consensus on deductions for premiums. Meanwhile, banks have urged the Finance Ministry to eliminate the credit institution tax, with the Tax Office remarking that it equates to an undue €15 million benefit for financial institutions. Nonetheless, many of the provisions outlined in the reform package are already in practice and will now be formalized through legislation.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter