Breaking news

Parliament Reviews Revisions To Personal Income Tax Reliefs Amid Calls For Comprehensive Reform

Parliamentary Debates Over Tax Reform on the Horizon

The legislature is currently evaluating changes to the tax deductions applicable to individual income tax filers. During a recent session of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, which focused on a broad legislative package for tax reform, multiple stakeholders—including trade unions and affiliated organizations—urged modifications. Lawmakers have called on the executive branch to consider these proposals, warning that parties may advance amendments through legislative motions if their concerns remain unaddressed.

Proposed Adjustments To Allowances And Deductions

Under the draft legislation, the tax-exempt threshold is slated to rise uniformly from €19,500 to €20,500. Additionally, further tax deductions would be introduced for cases where the combined annual income of spouses or cohabitants is capped at €80,000, raised to €100,000 for multi-child households, and fixed at €40,000 for single filers. A deduction of €1,000 is proposed for every child, student, or home energy upgrade, with an elevated benefit of €2,000 for families with multiple children. Furthermore, an interest deduction of €1,500 is offered for qualifying mortgage loans.

Credit Versus Deduction: A Matter Of Administrative Efficiency

A representative from SELK testified before the Finance Committee, endorsing support for individual taxpayers yet cautioning against channeling assistance solely through the tax deduction mechanism. The suggestion was made to replace deductions with tax credits, which would directly reduce the payable tax rather than merely lowering taxable income. This shift could substantially cut down on the administrative burden associated with implementing complex deduction schemes. Meanwhile, a representative of the Bar Association expressed concerns about ambiguities related to capping deductions when individuals receive other state benefits such as allowances or subsidies.

Concerns From Multi-Child Families And Labor Organizations

Representatives of the multi-child families’ association voiced serious reservations about the income thresholds that currently determine eligibility for tax relief. They argued that it is inequitable for larger families—for instance, one with eight children—to be constrained by an income limit of €100,000, while other families are subjected to a limit of €80,000. Furthermore, they called for provisions allowing for the transferability of deductions in single-income multi-child households, mirroring the allowances provided to single-parent families.

Advocacy For Scalable Relief And Fiscal Prudence

Stakeholders have also stressed that tax deductions should be structured on a sliding scale, increasing with the number of children and students. The PASYDY representative favored issuing a tax credit ranging from €200 to €250 per child rather than further deductions, arguing that deductions would impose an unnecessary administrative cost on the state. Additionally, proposals from the PEO recommended an incremental increase in the income threshold by €5,000 for each dependent beyond three children, while suggestions from the SEK call for further enhancements of the tax-exempt threshold to €22,000 and higher benefits for home loan interest and energy upgrades.

Fiscal Impact And Technical Evaluations

Experts from the Centre for Economic Research at the University of Cyprus have evaluated the potential fiscal impact. Without considering the number of dependents or income, the cost could reach approximately €30 million. However, if the income threshold is applied on a sliding scale, the cost estimates drop dramatically to around €3 million. In contrast, unrestricted implementation of all deductions might lead to a fiscal burden of up to €100 million.

Input From The Tax Authority And Banking Sector

Sotiris Markidis, representing the Tax Office, reiterated the position of Finance Minister Makis Keravnos, expressing openness to increasing the income limit for additional benefits from €80,000 to €90,000. Markidis noted that proposals from various unions and political parties would be forwarded to the minister for further review. Acknowledging the inherent complexity of the proposed system for individual taxpayers, he emphasized that any additional measures would only add layers of complexity, though he dismissed concerns over the marginal fiscal impact on families with numerous children.

Disparate Views Among Tax Professionals And Financial Institutions

On another front, SELK has raised objections regarding several technical issues, including the proposed increase in the corporate tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, the extension of loss carryforward periods from 5 to 7 years, and potential abuses related to deductions for interest on loans used for acquiring shares in wholly-owned subsidiaries. These concerns have been echoed by legal professionals. In the coming days, the Tax Department is slated to engage with the Insurance Companies Association to reach a consensus on deductions for premiums. Meanwhile, banks have urged the Finance Ministry to eliminate the credit institution tax, with the Tax Office remarking that it equates to an undue €15 million benefit for financial institutions. Nonetheless, many of the provisions outlined in the reform package are already in practice and will now be formalized through legislation.

AI Spending Is Complicating The Fed’s Fight Against Inflation

Silicon Valley leaders have long argued that artificial intelligence will make technology and services dramatically cheaper. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has described a future where intelligence becomes extremely inexpensive, while Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has predicted that AI and robotics will create greater abundance and drive down costs.

So far, those benefits have yet to materialise at scale. AI adoption remains relatively slow, while the enormous investment needed for data centres and AI infrastructure is putting pressure on electricity prices, supply chains and other costs. For the Federal Reserve, this creates a difficult balancing act: AI could eventually boost productivity and reduce inflation, but its current buildout is contributing to higher prices.

OpenAI chief economist Ronnie Chatterji said AI needs to be adopted by organisations and generate measurable value before its broader economic impact becomes visible in productivity statistics.

AI Adoption Remains Uneven

Capital spending on AI infrastructure in the U.S. is expected to reach $581 billion this year, according to Goldman Sachs Research, with global investment potentially reaching $1 trillion.

Despite the scale of spending, adoption remains far from universal. A May survey by the U.S. Census Bureau found that 17% to 20% of U.S. businesses reported using AI, with adoption significantly higher among large companies.

Companies that have implemented AI at scale also highlight the challenges. Julie Averill, former CIO of Lululemon, said successful deployment requires changes in employee behaviour and trust in the technology. OpenAI has observed a similar divide: its most advanced business users deploy AI at around eight times the rate of average companies.

Why Productivity Gains May Take Time

Economists point to the limits of automation. AI can perform individual tasks effectively, but many jobs combine tasks that are difficult to automate.

Stanford professor Charles Jones refers to these as “weak links”. Radiology, for example, involves interpreting scans but also communicating with patients and working with colleagues. AI can automate part of the job without eliminating the profession itself.

As a result, the full economic impact of AI may not become clear until businesses adopt the technology more broadly and reorganise their operations around it.

AI Adds To The Fed’s Policy Challenge

AI’s economic impact has become part of the Federal Reserve’s policy debate. Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has argued that AI could eventually become a significant disinflationary force by increasing productivity and strengthening U.S. competitiveness.

Other officials are more cautious. In July, the Fed kept interest rates at 3.5% to 3.75%, while some officials expressed concern that AI infrastructure spending could add to inflationary pressures.

Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari pointed to massive data-centre investment as a new source of demand. Household electricity prices rose 10% in the two years through July, compared with a 6.2% increase in overall consumer prices. Meanwhile, shortages of chips and other AI components are pushing up costs. JPMorgan Chase estimates that DRAM prices could rise 400% by the end of 2026 compared with 2024.

Warsh has consequently adopted a more cautious tone, saying that while AI investment is laying the groundwork for future growth, the timing and scale of its economic effects remain difficult to predict.

For the Fed, the challenge is clear: AI could eventually deliver major productivity gains, but the cost of building that future is already showing up in the economy.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter