Breaking news

Parliament Reviews Revisions To Personal Income Tax Reliefs Amid Calls For Comprehensive Reform

Parliamentary Debates Over Tax Reform on the Horizon

The legislature is currently evaluating changes to the tax deductions applicable to individual income tax filers. During a recent session of the Parliamentary Finance Committee, which focused on a broad legislative package for tax reform, multiple stakeholders—including trade unions and affiliated organizations—urged modifications. Lawmakers have called on the executive branch to consider these proposals, warning that parties may advance amendments through legislative motions if their concerns remain unaddressed.

Proposed Adjustments To Allowances And Deductions

Under the draft legislation, the tax-exempt threshold is slated to rise uniformly from €19,500 to €20,500. Additionally, further tax deductions would be introduced for cases where the combined annual income of spouses or cohabitants is capped at €80,000, raised to €100,000 for multi-child households, and fixed at €40,000 for single filers. A deduction of €1,000 is proposed for every child, student, or home energy upgrade, with an elevated benefit of €2,000 for families with multiple children. Furthermore, an interest deduction of €1,500 is offered for qualifying mortgage loans.

Credit Versus Deduction: A Matter Of Administrative Efficiency

A representative from SELK testified before the Finance Committee, endorsing support for individual taxpayers yet cautioning against channeling assistance solely through the tax deduction mechanism. The suggestion was made to replace deductions with tax credits, which would directly reduce the payable tax rather than merely lowering taxable income. This shift could substantially cut down on the administrative burden associated with implementing complex deduction schemes. Meanwhile, a representative of the Bar Association expressed concerns about ambiguities related to capping deductions when individuals receive other state benefits such as allowances or subsidies.

Concerns From Multi-Child Families And Labor Organizations

Representatives of the multi-child families’ association voiced serious reservations about the income thresholds that currently determine eligibility for tax relief. They argued that it is inequitable for larger families—for instance, one with eight children—to be constrained by an income limit of €100,000, while other families are subjected to a limit of €80,000. Furthermore, they called for provisions allowing for the transferability of deductions in single-income multi-child households, mirroring the allowances provided to single-parent families.

Advocacy For Scalable Relief And Fiscal Prudence

Stakeholders have also stressed that tax deductions should be structured on a sliding scale, increasing with the number of children and students. The PASYDY representative favored issuing a tax credit ranging from €200 to €250 per child rather than further deductions, arguing that deductions would impose an unnecessary administrative cost on the state. Additionally, proposals from the PEO recommended an incremental increase in the income threshold by €5,000 for each dependent beyond three children, while suggestions from the SEK call for further enhancements of the tax-exempt threshold to €22,000 and higher benefits for home loan interest and energy upgrades.

Fiscal Impact And Technical Evaluations

Experts from the Centre for Economic Research at the University of Cyprus have evaluated the potential fiscal impact. Without considering the number of dependents or income, the cost could reach approximately €30 million. However, if the income threshold is applied on a sliding scale, the cost estimates drop dramatically to around €3 million. In contrast, unrestricted implementation of all deductions might lead to a fiscal burden of up to €100 million.

Input From The Tax Authority And Banking Sector

Sotiris Markidis, representing the Tax Office, reiterated the position of Finance Minister Makis Keravnos, expressing openness to increasing the income limit for additional benefits from €80,000 to €90,000. Markidis noted that proposals from various unions and political parties would be forwarded to the minister for further review. Acknowledging the inherent complexity of the proposed system for individual taxpayers, he emphasized that any additional measures would only add layers of complexity, though he dismissed concerns over the marginal fiscal impact on families with numerous children.

Disparate Views Among Tax Professionals And Financial Institutions

On another front, SELK has raised objections regarding several technical issues, including the proposed increase in the corporate tax rate from 12.5% to 15%, the extension of loss carryforward periods from 5 to 7 years, and potential abuses related to deductions for interest on loans used for acquiring shares in wholly-owned subsidiaries. These concerns have been echoed by legal professionals. In the coming days, the Tax Department is slated to engage with the Insurance Companies Association to reach a consensus on deductions for premiums. Meanwhile, banks have urged the Finance Ministry to eliminate the credit institution tax, with the Tax Office remarking that it equates to an undue €15 million benefit for financial institutions. Nonetheless, many of the provisions outlined in the reform package are already in practice and will now be formalized through legislation.

ECB Launches Geopolitical Stress Tests For 110 Eurozone Banks

The European Central Bank is preparing a new round of geopolitical stress tests aimed at assessing potential risks to major financial institutions across the euro area. Up to 110 systemic banks, including institutions in Greece and the Bank of Cyprus, will take part in the exercise, which examines how geopolitical events could affect financial stability.

Timeline And Testing Process

Banks are expected to submit initial data on March 16, 2026. Supervisors will review the information in April, while the final results are scheduled to be published in July 2026. The process forms part of the ECB’s broader supervisory work to evaluate financial system resilience under different risk scenarios.

Geopolitical Shock As The Primary Concern

The stress tests place particular emphasis on geopolitical risks. These may include armed conflicts, economic sanctions, cyberattacks and energy supply disruptions. Such events can affect banks through changes in market conditions, borrower solvency and sector exposure. Lending portfolios linked to regions or industries affected by geopolitical developments may face higher risk levels.

Reverse Stress Testing: A Tailored Approach

Unlike traditional stress tests that apply the same scenario to all institutions, the reverse stress test requires each bank to define a scenario that could significantly affect its capital position. Banks must identify a geopolitical shock that could reduce their Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio by at least 300 basis points. Institutions are also expected to assess potential effects on liquidity, funding conditions and broader economic indicators such as GDP and unemployment.

Customized Risk Assessments And Supervisor Collaboration

This methodology allows banks to submit risk assessments based on their own exposures and operational structures. The approach is intended to help supervisors understand how geopolitical events could affect institutions differently and to support discussions between banks and regulators on risk management and contingency planning.

Differentiated Vulnerabilities Across Countries

A joint report by the ECB and the European Systemic Risk Board indicates that countries respond differently to geopolitical shocks. The Russian invasion of Ukraine led to higher energy prices and inflation across Europe, prompting central banks to raise interest rates. Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Greece and Austria experienced increases in borrowing costs and lower investor confidence. Germany, France and Portugal recorded more moderate changes, while Spain, Malta, Latvia and Finland showed intermediate levels of exposure.

Conclusion

The geopolitical stress tests will not immediately lead to additional capital requirements for banks. Their results will feed into the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). ECB supervisors may use the findings when assessing capital adequacy, risk management practices and operational resilience at individual institutions.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter