Breaking news

OpenAI Reviews Legal Options Following Apple ChatGPT Partnership

OpenAI is preparing for a legal confrontation with Apple after its highly anticipated ChatGPT integration delivered neither the subscriber surge nor the market prominence the company had envisioned. Sources familiar with the matter confirm that OpenAI has engaged an external law firm to explore its legal options against the iPhone manufacturer.

Legal Preparations and Strategic Considerations

According to Bloomberg, OpenAI’s legal team is reviewing the potential to issue a formal breach-of-contract notice, although any immediate escalation to a full-blown lawsuit appears unlikely. The company is reportedly taking a cautious approach, waiting for the resolution of its ongoing trial with Elon Musk before making any substantial legal moves.

Challenges Of The Apple Ecosystem

The situation has once again highlighted the challenges technology companies face when operating within Apple’s tightly controlled ecosystem. Although integration with the iPhone offers access to one of the world’s largest mobile platforms, external developers have historically raised concerns over visibility, platform control and limitations surrounding third-party services. Previous tensions involving companies such as Google, Adobe and Spotify have reflected similar frustrations linked to Apple’s ecosystem management policies.

Underwhelming Results From A High-Profile Partnership

The partnership between OpenAI and Apple was originally announced during Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in June 2024 and introduced ChatGPT integration across Apple operating systems, including Siri and the iPhone’s Visual Intelligence features. At the time, analysts expected the collaboration to generate significant subscription growth for OpenAI while strengthening its position within the mobile AI market. Reports now suggest that ChatGPT-related features have remained relatively difficult for users to discover inside Apple’s ecosystem, resulting in lower-than-expected adoption and engagement.

Historical Parallels And Industry Frictions

Industry observers have also drawn comparisons to earlier disputes between Apple and major technology partners. One of the most notable examples came in 2012, when Apple replaced Google Maps with Apple Maps, triggering widespread criticism and a public apology from former CEO Tim Cook. Apple’s longstanding refusal to support Adobe Flash under Steve Jobs similarly reshaped parts of the software industry, while Spotify has repeatedly criticised Apple’s App Store policies and commission structure.

Evolving Partnerships In The Tech Ecosystem

Despite the reported tensions with OpenAI, Apple continues expanding partnerships across the AI sector. Google currently serves as a major AI infrastructure partner for Apple through integration of Gemini models into Siri-related services under a multiyear agreement reportedly valued at around $1 billion annually. The situation reflects growing competition among major AI developers seeking distribution, visibility and control within dominant mobile ecosystems.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter