Breaking news

Oil Prices Surge Amid Syrian Turmoil

Oil prices kicked off the week on an upward trajectory after rebels ousted the 43-year rule of President Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez al-Assad. The prospect of civil war has fueled concerns over heightened tensions in the Middle East, raising the risk of supply chain disruptions.

Key Figures

  • Brent crude rose 0.52% to $71.49 per barrel.
  • US light crude climbed 0.58% to $67.59 per barrel.

These movements followed the seizure of Damascus by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, a radical rebel group, on Sunday. This marked the end of 50 years of Assad family rule, raising fears of a possible escalation into civil war.

The oil market’s upward trend comes after two consecutive weeks of losses for both Brent and US light crude, driven by growing expectations of oversupply in 2025.

Market Constraints

Despite the rise in prices, broader market sentiment remains weighed down by weak demand in China, the world’s second-largest economy. This prompted Saudi Aramco, the world’s top crude exporter, to slash its January 2025 prices for the Asian market to the lowest level since early 2021.

OPEC+ Strategy Shift

In a move that surprised markets, OPEC+ postponed its planned production increase for January by an entire year, rather than the previously expected three months. OPEC+ controls about 50% of global oil production, and the group had initially planned to ramp up production from October 2024. However, slowing demand, especially from China, along with rising output from other producers, forced multiple delays to the increase.

With the global energy market still under pressure from weak demand, the cartel’s decision signals a shift toward a more cautious production strategy to maintain price stability.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter