Breaking news

Nvidia’s $5.5B Hit: US Export Ban On AI Chips To China Shakes Global AI Race

Nvidia just took a $5.5 billion punch to the balance sheet—courtesy of the U.S. government’s latest move to tighten the leash on AI chip exports to China. The company’s most advanced processor available in the Chinese market, the H20, has now fallen under indefinite export restrictions, triggering a 6% slide in Nvidia shares in after-hours trading.

The decision, announced Tuesday, marks a major escalation in the U.S.-China tech standoff and underscores Washington’s growing concern over how AI hardware could fuel China’s supercomputing ambitions. The U.S. Commerce Department has now slapped licensing requirements not only on Nvidia’s H20, but also on AMD’s MI308 and similar chips. AMD shares dropped 7% after the news.

A Commerce Department spokesperson said the move reflects President Biden’s directive to safeguard U.S. national and economic security. Nvidia, meanwhile, confirmed the charges would cover unsold H20 inventory, outstanding purchase commitments, and related reserves.

A Workaround, Now Blocked

Nvidia had designed the H20 chip specifically to navigate around previous U.S. export limits—delivering toned-down performance but retaining high-speed interconnectivity. That design made the H20 attractive for AI inference tasks, an increasingly dominant segment of the market where models provide real-time answers rather than undergoing initial training.

Despite not being as powerful as Nvidia’s top-tier chips sold outside China, the H20 gained traction with major Chinese tech players including Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance. Reuters previously reported that demand surged after startups like DeepSeek ramped up development of low-cost AI models.

But that very design—optimized for high-bandwidth memory access and chip-to-chip connectivity—set off alarm bells in Washington. Analysts argue it still carries supercomputing potential, especially if deployed at scale.

“Likely In Violation”

A Washington, D.C.-based think tank, the Institute for Progress, didn’t mince words. In a statement Tuesday, it claimed that Tencent had already installed H20 chips in a facility likely used to train large AI models—potentially breaching U.S. export restrictions already in place. The group added that DeepSeek’s infrastructure, used for its latest V3 model, might also be in violation.

U.S. restrictions on chips used in supercomputing have been in effect since 2022. Now, the H20 is joining that list. Nvidia said it was formally notified on April 9 that the chip would require an export license—and on April 14, that the restriction would be indefinite. Whether the U.S. will issue any such licenses remains unclear.

A Fork In The Road

This latest move throws a wrench into Nvidia’s China strategy, just as demand in the region for generative AI tools is accelerating. It also highlights the growing friction between global innovation and geopolitical control—a tension Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang must now navigate carefully.

The setback comes one day after Nvidia unveiled plans to invest up to $500 billion into U.S.-based AI server infrastructure, working with partners like TSMC to align with American industrial policy.

Now, as Nvidia absorbs the financial blow and recalibrates, one thing is clear: the AI chip race isn’t just about performance anymore. It’s a front line in the broader battle over who controls the future of intelligent computing.

Meta’s $18 Billion Settlement Limits State Claims Over Children’s Data

Meta’s $18 billion settlement with attorneys general from 29 U.S. states includes a provision limiting future state claims over the company’s use of children’s data for age-assurance systems.

Under the agreement, Meta must develop, train and begin testing a system to identify users under 13 within a year of the settlement taking effect. The company already uses AI-based age-detection tools, although the agreement does not require the new system to use AI.

States Agree To Limits On Future Claims

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) generally restricts the collection and retention of personal data from children under 13. Under the settlement, the 29 state attorneys general agreed not to bring past, present or future claims under COPPA or similar state laws over the specified use of children’s data.

Meta will not be permitted to use information from users under 13 for advertising, marketing or algorithmic optimisation.

Federal Enforcement Remains Unclear

COPPA is primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which is not a party to the agreement. That leaves open the possibility of separate federal action over how Meta collects or uses children’s data.

Another issue is whether Meta can keep age-assurance data isolated from its other systems. An independent auditor will monitor compliance, but the settlement does not fully specify what data Meta can retain for training, how long it can be stored or whether derived insights can be used elsewhere.

Legal Risks Remain

Joshua Wurtzel, a partner at Schlam Stone & Dolan, said states could still pursue claims if Meta uses the data outside the settlement’s limits. Such cases could depend on how those limits are interpreted.

Peter Jackson, a data and intellectual property attorney at Greenberg Glusker, said the provision could “disincentivize future enforcement actions.”

The agreement gives Meta greater legal certainty around using children’s data for age assurance, but questions remain over federal enforcement, data retention and secondary use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter