Breaking news

New Year Brings Strategic Challenges as DEOK Unveils 2026 Reform Agenda

Addressing Urgent Economic and Social Issues

The new year presents a host of significant challenges and pressing issues that demand prudence, collaboration, and solidarity. In a recent announcement, DEOK has outlined its core priorities for 2026, with a particular emphasis on tackling the persistent housing crisis, which continues to be a thorn in the side of thousands of citizens—especially the younger generations. Alongside this, the escalating costs of essential goods are placing substantial burdens on households across the nation.

Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining

DEOK has expressed growing concern over the exploitation present in certain work environments, the disruption of established labor relationships, and the undermining of collective bargaining agreements—a situation that leaves thousands of workers facing an uncertain future. The organization stresses the need for:

  • Improved terms and conditions of employment,
  • The implementation of the European directives to ensure that at least 80% of workers benefit from collective agreements, and
  • A socially just reform of the pension system that guarantees dignified living standards for both current and future retirees.

Additionally, DEOK aims to strengthen the operational efficiency of Pension Funds as a robust second pillar in the retirement system and to reopen discussions regarding a 12% proportional reduction in pensions for long-term participants in the Social Security system.

Minimum Wage and Productivity Enhancement

In its communication, DEOK also highlights the imperative of protecting citizens from unscrupulous profit-seeking practices while placing a renewed focus on enhancing economic productivity. The organization underlines the critical benefits of upskilling and re-training the workforce, which not only bolsters individual career prospects but also drives wider economic resilience.

  • The National Minimum Wage should be set at a level that is at least 60% higher,
  • It should be defined on an hourly basis with a gradual target of 38 hours per week, and
  • It must include additional benefits such as paid holidays, sick leave, and maternity leave.

Looking Ahead

While the year 2025 witnessed notable progress, DEOK is unequivocal about its readiness to push further in 2026. The organization warns that the wealth generated is not equitably distributed among all economic stakeholders, thus calling for a more balanced approach in fiscal and social policies. DEOK’s advocated reforms represent a strategic blueprint aimed at safeguarding the future of the workforce and the broader economic well-being of society.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter