Breaking news

More Companies Reassess DEI Initiatives Amid Changing Landscape

In recent months, several major U.S. corporations have scaled back or restructured their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. This shift reflects broader political, legal, and economic pressures reshaping the corporate approach to inclusivity. Companies like Meta, Amazon, Ford, Lowe’s, and Microsoft have all made significant changes, sparking widespread debate about the future of DEI in corporate America.

Meta and Amazon: Pivotal Changes

Meta: A Strategic Shift Amid Conservative Pressure

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, recently announced the discontinuation of its DEI programs, including initiatives for hiring, training, and supplier selection. This decision aligns with other moves that suggest a shift toward accommodating conservative interests.

In recent weeks, Meta has:

  • Ended its U.S. fact-checking program.
  • Appointed prominent Republican Joel Kaplan as its Chief Global Affairs Officer.
  • Elected UFC CEO Dana White, a Trump ally, to its board.

Additionally, Meta made a $1 million contribution to Trump’s inaugural fund, signalling a notable pivot from its historically strained relationship with the former president. In an internal memo, Janelle Gale, Meta’s Vice President of Human Resources, attributed these changes to a “changing legal and policy landscape,” referencing the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down affirmative action in university admissions.

Amazon: A Strategic Reassessment

Amazon is also scaling back its DEI programs, with plans to phase out “outdated” materials and initiatives by the end of 2024. In a December memo, the company cited the need to reassess representation and inclusion efforts amid evolving societal and legal dynamics. This move comes as conservative groups increase scrutiny of DEI initiatives, claiming they promote preferential treatment. The decision aligns with broader industry trends influenced by recent court rulings, including a U.S. appeals court decision invalidating Nasdaq’s board diversity requirements.

Other Companies At A Crossroads

Ford Motor Company

In August 2024, Ford CEO Jim Farley announced significant reductions to the company’s DEI programs. These included ending minority hiring quotas and removing diversity-related performance metrics from executive compensation. Ford cited the changing regulatory and political environment as the primary driver behind these decisions.

Lowe’s

The home improvement retailer Lowe’s has also scaled back its DEI initiatives following targeted campaigns from conservative groups. While the company has yet to detail its long-term strategy, its actions reflect growing pressures from external stakeholders critical of DEI policies.

Microsoft

In July 2024, Microsoft disbanded its dedicated DEI team, a move that drew criticism from employees and advocacy groups. While Microsoft maintained that diversity remains a “core value,” the decision was framed as part of a broader organisational restructuring. A former team leader expressed concerns about the company’s waning commitment to systemic change.

McDonald’s

The fast-food giant recently announced the elimination of aspirational representation quotas and the discontinuation of its Supply Chain’s Mutual Commitment to DEI pledge. Despite this, McDonald’s stressed that inclusion remains a core business value, with 30% of U.S. leaders from underrepresented groups and gender pay equity achieved. The company plans to continue its focus on inclusive hiring and community engagement. McDonald’s aims to maintain transparency through annual demographic reports on its board, employees, and suppliers. This shift follows similar actions by companies like Walmart and John Deere, who have reevaluated their DEI efforts.

Why Companies Are Scaling Back DEI Initiatives

Evolving Political And Regulatory Environment

Recent legal decisions, such as the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against affirmative action, have reshaped how companies approach DEI. These changes have introduced new challenges for organisations attempting to balance inclusivity with compliance.

Conservative Backlash

DEI programs have increasingly become targets for conservative groups, who argue that such initiatives promote unfair advantages. Legal threats and public criticism have pushed companies to adopt more cautious approaches.

Questions Around Effectiveness

Internally, some organisations have questioned the tangible outcomes of their DEI efforts. Amid mounting economic pressures, DEI budgets are often among the first to face cuts as companies refocus on profitability.

The rollback of DEI initiatives at companies like Meta, Amazon, Ford, Lowe’s, Microsoft, and others underscores a broader shift in corporate priorities. These changes reflect the intersection of legal challenges, political influences, and economic realities. While some argue that inclusivity is essential for innovation and long-term success, others see the current trend as a necessary recalibration. As the conversation around DEI continues to evolve, the future of corporate diversity efforts remains uncertain, but it is clear that the topic is far from resolved.

Foreign Firms Contribute €3.5 Billion To Cyprus Economy In 2023

Recent Eurostat data reveals that Cyprus remains an outlier within the European Union, where foreign-controlled companies contribute minimally to the nation’s employment figures and economic output. While these enterprises have a substantial impact in other member states, in Cyprus they account for only 10 percent of all jobs, a figure comparable only to Italy and marginally higher than Greece’s 8 percent.

Employment Impact

The report highlights that foreign-controlled companies in Cyprus employ 32,119 individuals out of a total workforce that, across the EU, reaches 24,145,727. In contrast, countries such as Luxembourg boast a 45 percent job share in foreign-controlled firms, with Slovakia and the Czech Republic following closely at 28 percent.

Economic Output Analysis

In terms of economic contribution, these enterprises generated a total value added of €3.5 billion in Cyprus, a small fraction compared to the overall EU total of €2.39 trillion. Notably, Ireland leads with 71 percent of its value added stemming from foreign-controlled firms, followed by Luxembourg at 61 percent and Slovakia at 50 percent. On the lower end, France, Italy, Greece, and Germany exhibit values below 20 percent.

Domestic Versus Foreign Ownership

The data underscores Cyprus’s heavy reliance on domestically controlled enterprises for both employment and economic output. However, it is important to note that certain businesses might be owned by foreign nationals who have established companies under Cypriot jurisdiction. As a result, these firms are classified as domestically controlled despite having foreign ownership or management components.

Conclusion

This analysis emphasizes the unique role that foreign-controlled enterprises play within the Cypriot economy. While their overall impact is limited compared to some EU counterparts, the presence of these companies continues to contribute significantly to the island’s economic landscape.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter