Breaking news

Larnaca Unveils Ambitious €30 Million Art and Design Complex

Larnaca has broken ground on a landmark €30 million Art and Design Centre, set to be completed by 2030. Designed by world-renowned British firm Foster and Partners, the project will also feature the Museum of People and serve as the flagship of the city’s European Capital of Culture bid.

A Cultural Hub for the Future

The complex will be built on a 4,000-square-metre seaside plot, granted by the Petrolina Group as compensation. The site, located next to the American University of Cyprus, forms part of the wider ‘Larnaca – Land of Tomorrow’ regeneration zone.

The aim is for the centre to become a landmark for both the new district and the city as a whole, and for that reason, Foster, who also designed the area’s masterplan, was chosen to lead the project.

A World-Class Cultural Institution

The centre will consist of three core structures: the Art Centre, the Design Centre, and the Museum of People. According to Kelly Diapouli, artistic director of Larnaca 2030, the initiative is “a cultural centre that does not exist in Cyprus” and will serve as the organisation’s main operational base.

The Art Centre will feature two performance spaces, including one reconfigurable hall with a capacity of 1,000 to 1,500 people. The Design Centre, meanwhile, will focus on creative innovation by combining local tradition with modern production methods.

The third component is the Museum of People, developed by Joseph Hadjikyriakos as an evolution of the Larnaca Archives, Phoebus Stavridis. Described as an ‘anti-museum’, it will turn everyday objects into stories through curated art and technology.

Visitors will be able to experience the space interactively through an app that personalises their journey. As previously reported, the Museum of People will give the substance of the point where identities are defined, importance is given to memory, but also the possibility of creating the future.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter