Breaking news

Inside The Compensation Structure Of European Parliament Members

Overview Of Compensation And Allowances

Debate over the pay and allowances of Members of the European Parliament regularly resurfaces, particularly during periods of scrutiny over EU spending. The remuneration structure, taxation rules, and work-related budgets allocated to MEPs remain a frequent subject of public and political discussion.

Base Salary And Deductions

Since July 2009, all MEPs have been paid under a unified system designed to ensure equal treatment across the Parliament’s 720 members. Under a decision of the European Court of Justice, parliamentary salaries correspond to 38.5% of the basic judicial remuneration.

The current gross monthly salary stands at €11,255.26. After EU tax and social security deductions, the net monthly amount is approximately €8,772.70. Salaries are paid directly from the European Parliament budget, although member states may apply additional national taxation.

Daily Allowance And Attendance Requirements

MEPs receive a daily allowance of €359 (2026 rate) for attending official plenary sessions in Strasbourg or Brussels, provided they sign the attendance register. If a member participates in fewer than half of roll-call votes on a voting day, the allowance is reduced by half.

For sessions outside the EU, the daily allowance falls to €179.50, with accommodation reimbursed separately. During the monthly Green Week, MEPs work in their constituencies and do not receive attendance-based allowances for committee meetings. Average consolidated net monthly income is estimated at around €10,000, although many members incur additional accommodation costs in Brussels or Strasbourg.

General Expense Allowance And Travel Reimbursements

MEPs also receive a monthly allowance of €4,950 (2025 rate) to cover office operations, equipment, administrative expenses, and official representation. The amount is reduced by 50% if an MEP is unjustifiably absent from at least half of the plenary sessions during the parliamentary year.

Travel costs are reimbursed based on actual expenses within defined limits: business-class airfare, first-class rail travel, or €0.59 per kilometre by car (up to 720 km per trip and 60,000 km annually). Additional travel-related costs, including tolls and booking fees, may also be reimbursed. For official duties within the member’s home country, expenses are covered up to annual limits, while activities abroad are reimbursed up to €5,638 per year.

Staffing And Personal Assistance Budget

MEPs may hire their own assistants under Parliament rules. In 2016, each member was allocated up to €32,072 per month for staffing costs, covering salaries, fees, and social contributions. The allocation is identical for all members, with contracts administered by payment agents to ensure compliance with EU and national regulations. The budget may also cover assistants’ travel costs for official duties.

Pension And Ethical Standards

Former MEPs are eligible for a pension from age 63, calculated at 3.5% of the basic salary per full year of service, plus proportional amounts for additional months, capped at 70% of salary. Pension payments are financed through the EU budget.

MEPs are required to follow a code of conduct introduced in 2012 and updated in 2023. The framework addresses conflicts of interest, financial transparency, and disclosure obligations, including gifts exceeding €150 in value. Members must also declare instances where travel or accommodation is financed by external parties. Violations may lead to sanctions imposed by the President of the European Parliament, with penalties published publicly.

Context And Implications

The compensation system aims to balance fair remuneration with accountability and transparency. While allowances are justified as necessary for parliamentary work across multiple locations, they remain under continuous public scrutiny. Understanding the structure of these payments is essential for assessing how EU institutions operate and allocate public funds.

Meta’s Muse Is Outpacing ChatGPT In Early Mobile Adoption, New Data Suggests

Meta’s new AI app, Muse, may be emerging as one of the company’s strongest consumer launches to date. Fresh estimates from market intelligence firm Apptopia suggest the app has outperformed ChatGPT in early mobile traction, at least in the U.S. and Canada.

According to Apptopia, Muse recorded more downloads in its first 12 days on the market than ChatGPT did during the comparable period after its mobile debut. The comparison, limited to the U.S. and Canada, puts Muse’s iOS downloads at 1.8 million versus 1.3 million for ChatGPT over the same initial window.

A Strong Early Start Across Platforms

In total, Muse has reached 2.8 million global installs in its first 12 days, according to the firm. The app’s momentum also appears to be holding. After debuting at No. 2 on the U.S. App Store, Muse has since climbed to No. 1, surpassing ChatGPT, according to reporting from Business Insider. Appfigures had previously estimated that Muse crossed 1 million downloads shortly after launch.

That early rise matters because app-store performance in the first days after launch often signals whether a product can sustain consumer attention beyond initial curiosity. In Meta’s case, the data suggests Muse is not simply benefiting from novelty; it is gaining ground quickly enough to challenge the category leader.

Daily Users Show Similar Momentum

Apptopia’s estimates point to another favorable comparison for Meta: daily usage. In the U.S. alone, Muse is said to have 642,000 daily active users, well above the 231,000 ChatGPT had at the same stage of its mobile rollout.

To make the comparison fairer, Apptopia also narrowed the analysis to iOS only, since ChatGPT launched on iPhone before expanding more broadly. Even under that tighter lens, Muse still comes out ahead, with 359,000 daily active users on iOS compared with ChatGPT’s earlier figure.

Why Meta Has An Advantage

Third-party estimates are not the same as internal company data, and Apptopia cannot see Meta’s proprietary numbers. Still, even directional data suggests Muse may be on track to become a meaningful consumer product for Meta.

That possibility is strengthened by Meta’s distribution advantage. The company has already demonstrated how powerful its ecosystem can be with Threads, which surpassed 500 million users after heavy promotion across Instagram and Facebook. Muse is likely to receive a similar boost, especially because it can connect across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

Apptopia does not track Meta’s internal promotion strategy, but its data indicates that more than 95% of Muse users are also Facebook users, while 63% are Instagram users. That overlap underscores how effectively Meta can move users across its products when it chooses to prioritize a launch.

The Strategic Test For Meta

For Meta, the early signal from Muse is less about one app’s download count than about whether the company can turn its scale into durable AI adoption. The first test is attention. The harder one is retention.

If Muse can convert early downloads into habitual use, Meta may have found a new front door into its AI ambitions. If not, the app risks becoming another example of how easily mobile hype can spike before settling back down.

Meta, which was asked for comment, has not yet released public figures on Muse’s early adoption.

Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter