Breaking news

Innovative Tax Enforcement: Securing Corporate Shares And Real Estate To Bolster Fiscal Compliance

Government authorities have long struggled with taxpayers exploiting legal loopholes to evade fiscal responsibilities, leaving the nation’s tax system vulnerable. Recent legislative proposals aim to close these gaps by introducing new mechanisms that target not only traditional assets, but also corporate shares held indirectly by non-compliant taxpayers.

Closing Legal Loopholes In Tax Collection

The backdrop to the latest reforms is a history of tax evasion, where individuals, despite their status as company shareholders, strategically avoid declaring assets under their personal names. This deliberate omission obstructs effective taxation. The proposed package of tax reforms, discussed in the tax restructuring initiative, introduces an additional enforcement tool: the seizure of corporate shares to secure outstanding tax liabilities.

The Mechanics Of Share Seizure

The new measure provides tax authorities with the power to bind corporate shares as collateral for unpaid taxes exceeding €100,000. Under the proposed framework, if a taxpayer delays or neglects payment for 30 days after the tax becomes due, the Tax Department may proceed to seize the individual’s shares. This remedy complements existing practices, such as the placement of bank account garnishments and property liens, ensuring that even indirect assets are brought into the compliance framework.

Key elements of the share seizure procedure include:

  • The authority to bind any equity holding belonging to the delinquent taxpayer, thus securing the tax liability.
  • The possibility for the taxpayer to contest the action within 30 days, with a resolution expected within one month.
  • An option to appeal to the Court for the removal of the seizure once the outstanding tax has been settled, especially if other enforcement measures inflict lesser impact.
  • The implementation of a 15-day release period following full tax clearance.

Real Estate Transfers As Collateral

In parallel, the reform package also addresses scenarios involving immovable property. Should the tax arrears exceed €10,000, the Tax Department is permitted to request the Finance Minister to authorize the transfer of property ownership to the state in exchange for debt settlement. This process is contingent upon the property being free of encumbrances and ensures that any excess value is refunded to the owner. Additionally, if the property’s appraised value is within 20% of the total tax liability, the transfer may proceed efficiently.

Reassessing Enforcement And Exploring Alternatives

The revised statutes further empower authorities to enhance existing methods aimed at securing bank accounts and real estate investments. Historical data reflect a fluctuating efficacy in previous measures over the last eleven years, prompting the need for robust reforms. For example, recent statistics reveal significant discrepancies between periods of successful bank account seizures and the overall efficacy of property liens.

Moreover, taxpayers are now offered an alternative path to settle their liabilities. They may opt to transfer real estate to the state in lieu of cash payment, pending approval by the Minister of Finance. This approach mirrors practices common in the banking sector where collateral is used to mitigate credit risks.

These comprehensive measures reflect a renewed commitment by fiscal authorities to enforce tax compliance more equitably. By targeting both direct and indirect assets, the state aims to secure revenues and deter future evasion, ultimately strengthening the integrity of the nation’s tax system.

CySEC Enhances Market Integrity By Withdrawing Firms From Compensation Fund

Regulatory Action Strengthens Investor Protection

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has taken decisive steps to protect investors by removing two investment firms, VM Vita Markets Ltd and HTFX EU Ltd, from the Investors Compensation Fund (ICF). This move follows the earlier rescission of their Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) authorizations.

Link Between Licensing And Compensation

The ICF serves as a safety mechanism, ensuring that clients receive due compensation if an authorized firm is unable to return funds or financial instruments. With the withdrawal of their operating licenses, these firms were rendered ineligible for the fund, highlighting the direct correlation between valid authorization and participation in investor protection schemes.

Preservation Of Client Rights

CySEC has been clear that the removal from the compensation scheme does not jeopardize the entitlements of affected clients. Investors who conducted eligible transactions before the revocation of membership retain the right to claim compensation, provided they meet the established conditions outlined in the directive. This precaution ensures that investors continue to receive remediatory support, even as the firms exit the regulated framework.

Maintaining Oversight In A Dynamic Market

This regulatory intervention reinforces CySEC’s commitment to market oversight and financial stability. By aligning firm licensing with participation in investor safeguard programs, the commission exemplifies robust supervisory practices that adapt to evolving market conditions. Such measures bolster investor confidence and set a standard for regulatory practices in similar financial markets worldwide.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter