Breaking news

India Revamps Deep Tech Startup Framework With New Capital Support

India is making a bold strategic shift in its deep tech landscape by adjusting startup regulations and directing public capital towards sectors that demand sustained development, including space, semiconductors, and biotech.

Extended Timeline For Deep Tech Maturation

The Indian government has recently updated its startup framework, as announced by the Press Information Bureau. The period during which deep tech companies enjoy starter benefits has been doubled to 20 years, and the revenue threshold for specialized tax breaks, grants, and regulatory benefits has increased from ₹1 billion to ₹3 billion (approximately $33.12 million). This recalibration is designed to align policy parameters with the long gestation periods inherent in science- and engineering-driven enterprises.

Public Capital And the RDI Fund

Alongside regulatory reforms, New Delhi is expanding public investment in research and innovation. The ₹1 trillion Research, Development and Innovation Fund is intended to provide long-term financing for technology-intensive companies. The initiative is supported by the creation of the India Deep Tech Alliance, a network of U.S. and Indian venture capital firms including Accel, Blume Ventures and Kalaari Capital, with advisory input from Nvidia. The goal is to ease fundraising pressures and improve access to follow-on capital.

Addressing The False Failure Signal

The extension of regulatory benefits addresses a long-standing issue in the deep tech sector. As Vishesh Rajaram, founding partner at Speciale Invest, explained, the previous framework risked penalizing pre-commercial companies by forcing them to exit startup status prematurely. The new reforms recognize the unique developmental timelines of deep tech firms, thus reducing friction in fundraising negotiations and state engagement.

Investor Perspectives And The Funding Landscape

While regulatory clarity enhances investor confidence, funding beyond early stages remains a significant hurdle. Arun Kumar, managing partner at Celesta Capital, emphasized that the RDI Fund’s role is to deepen support for capital-intensive ventures without compromising the commercial metrics that guide private investments. Siddarth Pai of 3one4 Capital noted that the revised framework also avoids the traditional “graduation cliff” that once isolated companies at critical growth junctures, potentially deterring them from scaling domestically.

Deep Tech Funding Trends And Global Comparisons

India’s deep tech sector remains smaller than those of the United States and China, but recent data shows renewed momentum. According to Tracxn, Indian deep tech startups raised about $1.65 billion in 2025, up from roughly $1.1 billion in previous years. The increase aligns with national priorities in advanced manufacturing, defense technology, climate solutions and semiconductor production.

Long-Term Implications And Global Competitiveness

For international investors, the reforms signal a longer-term policy commitment. Extending the startup lifecycle reduces regulatory uncertainty and supports investment strategies that depend on extended research and product development phases. Analysts suggest the changes bring India closer to funding models commonly seen in the U.S. and Europe.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of the reforms will depend on whether they lead to a critical mass of globally competitive Indian deep tech companies. A more mature ecosystem could encourage domestic listings and reduce the need for startups to relocate abroad.

India’s regulatory and financial adjustments aim not only to solve immediate operational challenges for founders but also to build a stronger foundation for long-term technological competitiveness.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter