Breaking news

Immediate Payment Revolution In Cyprus: Transforming Cross-Border Transactions In 10 Seconds

Overview Of The New Payment Era

Starting October 9, 2025, Cyprus will implement a groundbreaking system for immediate payments that revolutionizes the way interbank and cross-border transactions are executed. Citizens and businesses alike will soon be able to send or receive funds from any bank within Cyprus or the SEPA region in as little as 10 seconds, a stark departure from the current process that can take up to two working days.

Regulatory Framework And Enhanced Security

The initiative is anchored in the European Regulation for Immediate Payments, which designates specific timelines: January 9, 2025, for the acceptance of immediate payments and October 9, 2025, for their successful transmission. This regulatory framework mandates that banks upgrade their electronic systems with state-of-the-art security protocols to mitigate fraud, reduce errors, and monitor suspicious activities.

Verification Of Payee: A Critical Innovation

A standout feature of the new system is the Verification of Payee process. This mechanism confirms that the provided IBAN corresponds to the correct beneficiary name, thereby significantly reducing the risk of erroneous transactions or fraudulent activity. In a business environment where accuracy is paramount, this enhancement offers robust protection for all parties involved.

Transaction Limits And Fee Structures

Individual banks will determine the specific transfer limits for immediate payments. Importantly, the regulation restricts banks from imposing fees higher than those currently charged for traditional transfers, ensuring cost-efficient transactions for users.

Innovative Services For Customer Convenience

Banks are also exploring additional service options to improve customer experience. One promising initiative is the development of a unified platform—akin to an app—that would facilitate payments using a phone number or email address instead of a traditional IBAN. Currently in the study phase, this platform is expected to launch in Cyprus by 2026, potentially redefining the digital payment landscape.

Commitment To Speed And Security

With these comprehensive changes, both citizens and businesses will benefit from faster, more secure payment options, all while maintaining fees at or below current banking charges. This transformation not only enhances the efficiency of financial transactions but also builds greater trust in the digital economy.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter