Breaking news

Housing Affordability Crisis In Cyprus: Policy Reforms And Economic Implications

At the 4th Akel Economy Forum in Nicosia, leading policymakers and industry experts issued a decisive call for comprehensive reforms to address the mounting housing affordability crisis in Cyprus and across the European Union. Conversations centered on introducing tighter controls over property purchases by third-country nationals, accelerating licensing processes, and establishing a unified housing authority to ensure balanced market practices.

Addressing Housing Vulnerabilities

Discussions, framed under the theme ‘Mass Real Estate Purchase And Housing Crisis: Right Or Privilege?’, featured contributions from figures such as Akel MP Aristos Damianou, MEP Ilaria Salis, Constantinos Constanti of the Scientific And Technical Chamber (Etek), and Stelios Gavriil, President Of The Association Of Building Contractors (Oseok). Their analysis revealed that both national and European initiatives have thus far fallen short in arresting the relentless climb in property prices and rents, systematically excluding low- and middle-income households from the market.

EU Policy And The Role Of Brussels

MEP Ilaria Salis observed that the demand pressures in Cyprus echo challenges seen in major Italian cities and other EU locales. She noted that while Brussels is poised to unveil an action plan by mid-December, there has been minimal consultation with the European Parliament—a gap that could undermine the robustness of future housing legislation. Salis warned that existing EU policies overly favor private interests, offering little support for rent regulation or the development of public and social housing.

Strategic Shifts In Housing Policy

Advocating for a paradigm shift, Salis emphasized the need to reconceptualize housing as a social right and curb the allure of disproportionate profits. She proposed policy measures that include:

  • Implementing democratic and collective contracts that incorporate rent caps linked to income, ensuring housing costs do not exceed 30 percent of monthly earnings.
  • Enforcing limits on short-term rentals to promote long-term affordability.
  • Commencing sizable investments in public and social housing, with urban renewal projects featuring a mandated percentage of non-market units, partly funded by European resources.
  • Institutionalizing citizen participation via community associations to directly shape housing policy, alongside establishing EU-wide standards to shield households from eviction.

Local Initiatives And Broader Economic Impact

Local governmental bodies also offered targeted proposals, ranging from restricting property sales to third-country nationals and repurposing vacant units, to streamlining planning permits. Etek introduced fiscal incentives such as reducing VAT to 5 percent for renovation projects, reforming the ‘renovate-to-rent’ scheme, and taxing idle land to incentivize development.

MP Aristos Damianou highlighted that Akel’s comprehensive housing policy package, currently embodied in two newly proposed bills, aims to enhance access to affordable housing as the government transitions away from unsustainable models like the now-defunct golden passport scheme. He argued that an open economy naturally recalibrates in response to emerging market opportunities, setting the stage for more socially balanced development.

A Decade Of Strategic Change

Industry leader Stelios Gavriil underscored the necessity of refining existing housing schemes to broaden beneficiary eligibility. He urged that financial institutions ease the path for young couples—especially regarding down-payment requirements for bank loans—and called for a forward-looking, ten-year national housing strategy.

In summary, the forum underscored the urgency for both local and EU-wide reforms, positioning housing not merely as a commodity but as an essential social right. As policymakers and market leaders align on these initiatives, the evolving landscape may well offer a blueprint for resolving the housing crises confronting many modern economies.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter