Breaking news

Hemorrhagic Fever Outbreak Puts Pressure On Cyprus Livestock Sector

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

Rapid Onset Of A Livestock Emergency

Cyprus’ livestock sector is facing growing pressure following the spread of hemorrhagic fever across several free-range farming areas. Authorities report 11 affected facilities and around 13,000 animals considered at risk in regions including Livadia, Oroklini, Troulloi, and Aradippou.

Estimated compensation costs have reached approximately €4.5 million, covering livestock losses as well as related products such as milk and reproductive material.

Intensified Epidemiological Investigations

Veterinary Services have launched extensive epidemiological investigations aimed at identifying the source and transmission pathways of the outbreak. Law enforcement authorities are also assisting in inquiries related to possible delays in reporting initial cases.

Officials say early notification remains critical for limiting the spread of animal diseases and reducing economic impact on producers.

Strict Emergency Measures Enforced

Following confirmation of the outbreak on February 20 in a cattle unit in Livadia, the government activated its Emergency Action Plan under Regulation 2020/687. Authorities believe the virus may have been circulating earlier in nearby areas.

Key measures include:

  • Checkpoint Controls And Disinfection
    Police and veterinary teams have established control points and disinfection units in affected zones, including Aradippou, Livadia, Keleia, Troulloi, and Oroklini.

  • Movement Restrictions
    Transportation of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and related feed is restricted without special authorization.

  • Product Control Measures
    Milk from affected facilities is being removed from the supply chain, while controlled disposal procedures for infected animals are underway.

  • Hunting And Outdoor Activity Restrictions
    Hunting and dog training activities have been suspended in affected areas to reduce environmental transmission risks.

Political Pressure And Industry Concerns

The outbreak has intensified debate within the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture, where lawmakers reviewed earlier containment measures introduced in late 2025 after initial suspicions of disease activity.

While laboratory tests conducted in nearby zones previously returned negative results, farmers continue to express concern over economic losses and uncertainty. Authorities say inspections and biosecurity controls will remain in place as monitoring continues.

International Veterinary Cooperation And EU Response

Amid the grim scenario, the EU veterinarian team from Brussels (EUVET) offers a global perspective. With the imminent arrival of 10,000 vaccine doses today from a reserve of 500,000 doses sent to occupied areas, and another 10,000 expected next week, the rollout will be managed under the expertise of EUVET, who remains on the island until Friday.

Notably, although only 11 premises have so far reported contamination, early incidents in a cattle farm and two large sheep stations in the Larnaca district had already captured international attention. In light of this outbreak, the European Commission is set to authorize measures, including a decisive culling of animals at affected farms, destruction of animal products, and comprehensive facility disinfection.

Export Challenges And Future Precautions

Following the outbreak, the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) suspended Cyprus’ disease-free status, temporarily affecting exports of susceptible live animals and certain untreated animal products.

EU guidelines require strict controls within designated restriction zones, including movement monitoring, facility sanitation, and regulated handling of animal products. Authorities say dairy products from affected farms must be managed under controlled conditions to ensure safety.

Moving Forward

Additional measures are expected in the coming days, including expanded vaccination efforts and continued surveillance. Officials say coordination between national authorities, veterinary experts, and EU partners will be central to limiting the spread of the disease and stabilizing the livestock sector.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter