Breaking news

Government Approves €207.4 Million Supplementary Funding Amid Strategic Budget Adjustments

The House is set to review additional credits totaling €207.4 million in the coming days. Today, the first supplementary budget for 2025 was formally submitted to Parliament, outlining a fiscal response to increased departmental needs. According to the Ministry of Finance, these adjustments aim not only to address heightened operational demands but also to bolster the efficiency of public administration through strategic staffing enhancements.

Supplementary Budget Credits and Strategic Positioning

The supplementary budget covers essential areas, including the creation of new positions designed to strengthen the state apparatus. Notably, among the changes are the establishment of two new Assistant Supervisors in the Specialized Independent Services. In the Ministry of Defence, structural adjustments include the creation of nine Colonel positions, 19 Lieutenant Colonel roles, 12 Major positions, and 34 First-Class Sergeant roles. Concurrently, 39 Lieutenant positions, 13 Corporal roles, and 22 hourly wage positions have been abolished to maintain a fiscally neutral balance.

Formation of New Strategic Leadership Roles

Following the Cabinet’s decision to establish the General Directorate of Civil Protection, two pivotal roles will be introduced: one General Director and one National Coordinator, both tasked with enhancing the nation’s emergency preparedness. The overall supplementary budget remains fiscally balanced with offsetting savings amounting to €207.4 million, ensuring that the 2026 staffing structure remains consistent with projections.

Comprehensive Government Budget Amendments

In parallel, the Cabinet approved key modifications to the 2026 state budget. These adjustments, which will be integrated into the budget discussion beginning on the 15th at Parliament, involve reallocating funds, transferring resources among departments, and recalibrating personnel configurations. Specifically, the reforms include the creation of 153 new or additional positions, the elimination of 153 public service roles along with 52 vacancies in hourly wage positions, and the renaming or upgrading of select positions and organizational structures.

Fiscal Discipline and Operational Savings

The Ministry of Finance assures that these revisions will not alter the overall employment landscape. In fact, the reduction of 14 permanent roles in the 2026 budget relative to 2025 remains constant. Provisions are also made for establishing the General Directorate of Civil Protection within the Ministry of Interior, with the impending transfer of the Fire Service and select Forestry Department functions under its purview. Moreover, adjustments to public service allowances are set in accordance with the recently signed agreements between employer organizations and labor unions.

Robust Savings Towards Fiscal Stability

The government expects significant savings through these budget modifications, with anticipated reductions of €46.3 million in 2026, €57.1 million in 2027, and €56.4 million in 2028. The overall fiscal balance remains static as the total ceiling for the 2026 budget is maintained at €10.7 billion. Savings are largely attributed to changes in the overtime payment processes for seconded staff at OKYPI, where overtime will now be managed directly by the organization rather than the Ministry of Health.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter