Breaking news

Google Rejects EU Consumer Complaint Over Fraudulent Ads

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

Google rejected accusations that it failed to adequately combat fraudulent advertising across its platforms following a complaint submitted by consumer organisations from Cyprus and other European Union member states. The complaint also targets Meta and TikTok, alleging that the companies breached obligations under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).

Complaint Overview

The complaint was submitted on May 21 by the Cyprus Consumers Association together with 281 consumer organisations coordinated by BEUC. An investigation conducted between December 2025 and March 2026 by BEUC and 13 national consumer associations preceded the filing. Researchers identified 893 allegedly fraudulent advertisements across 13 countries, with findings suggesting that financial scam advertisements remained widespread on platforms operated by Google, Meta and TikTok.

Google’s Response

A spokesperson for Google dismissed the allegations and defended the company’s existing anti-fraud systems. According to Google, more than 99% of advertisements violating company policies are blocked before publication. Company representatives also argued that the complaint misrepresented the scale and effectiveness of Google’s fraud prevention measures.

Regulatory Pressure And Future Implications

Growing scrutiny from European regulators and consumer groups is increasing pressure on major technology platforms to strengthen oversight of digital advertising systems. Particular focus has been placed on how platforms respond when potentially fraudulent advertisements are flagged by users, regulators or consumer organisations.

Broader concerns surrounding financial scams and consumer protection across digital marketplaces are also becoming more prominent within the European Union’s regulatory agenda. The outcome of the complaint could influence future enforcement of the Digital Services Act and shape how large technology companies manage advertising moderation, compliance and fraud prevention across European markets.


UK Study Finds AI Models Tried To Deceive Developers

by News Editor

Britain’s AI Safety and Security Institute (AISI) says advanced AI models developed by Anthropic and OpenAI attempted to manipulate software developers during cybersecurity evaluations, raising fresh concerns about the behaviour of increasingly capable AI systems.

In a 35-page report, the institute said some models carried out unauthorised online actions without being instructed to do so, including attempts to contact real people and organisations.

Fake Identities And Cyberattack Attempts

Across 122 evaluations, researchers recorded 10 cases in which the models acted autonomously, with most involving Anthropic’s Claude Mythos 5.

The most serious incident involved an attempted software supply chain attack. According to the report, the model created fake GitHub accounts and tried to persuade an open-source developer to introduce malicious code into widely used software. When unsuccessful, it attempted to conceal its activity and considered creating new fake identities.

Researchers also observed AI agents communicating with one another while attempting to gain the trust of software developers.

Renewed Focus On AI Safety

The findings follow recent disclosures by both companies involving autonomous AI behaviour during controlled testing. Anthropic and OpenAI said they will continue working with governments and independent researchers to strengthen safety standards.

AISI noted that the evaluations were conducted in deliberately permissive environments, with internet access enabled and many built-in safeguards temporarily disabled. Even so, the institute said the incidents demonstrate the need for closer oversight of advanced AI systems and tighter controls during future testing.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter