Opens in a new tab

Breaking news

Google Faces £5 Billion Class Action Lawsuit in the UK for Abusing Dominance in Search Advertising

Google is facing a potential £5 billion ($6.6 billion) lawsuit in the UK over allegations that it leveraged its overwhelming dominance in the online search market to inflate advertising prices. A class action filed on Wednesday in the U.K. Competition Appeal Tribunal accuses Google of using its market power to restrict competition and solidify its monopoly, ultimately making itself the only viable option for online search advertising.

Key Points:

  • A class action lawsuit filed in the U.K. claims Google exploited its “near-total dominance” in the online search market, driving up prices and hindering competition.
  • The suit, seeking over £5 billion in damages, targets Google’s search advertising practices from January 1, 2011, to the present.
  • A 2020 study by the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) revealed Google controls 90% of the search advertising market.

The lawsuit, led by competition law academic Or Brook, represents hundreds of thousands of U.K.-based organizations that used Google’s search advertising services between January 1, 2011, and the present. Brook, who is being represented by Geradin Partners law firm, argues that Google’s monopolistic practices have forced businesses of all sizes to rely on Google’s advertising platform, giving the tech giant unchecked control over online visibility.

“UK businesses have no choice but to use Google ads to reach customers,” Brook said in a statement. “Google’s monopoly power in search and search advertising has allowed it to overcharge advertisers. This lawsuit seeks to hold Google accountable and secure compensation for UK businesses that have been exploited.”

The class action follows a 2020 investigation by the U.K.’s CMA, which found that Google captured a staggering 90% of the search advertising revenue in the country. The lawsuit claims Google has taken several measures to further suppress competition, including deals with smartphone manufacturers to pre-install its search engine and Chrome browser on Android devices, as well as multi-billion dollar agreements with Apple to make Google the default search engine on Safari.

Moreover, the suit highlights that Google has made its own search advertising tools, like Search Ads 360, more attractive by offering better features than those of its competitors, further consolidating its dominant position.

The legal action adds to a growing list of antitrust challenges faced by Big Tech companies. In 2018, Google was fined €4.3 billion ($4.9 billion) by the European Union for unfairly bundling its Chrome browser and search engine with Android, a penalty it continues to appeal. This latest case underscores the increasing scrutiny of tech giants’ market practices, as regulators globally ramp up efforts to tackle monopolistic behavior in the digital age.

Additionally, the U.K.’s CMA has recently raised concerns about competition in the cloud computing market, with investigations into Amazon and Microsoft underway. The tech sector is clearly under the microscope, with Big Tech firms facing unprecedented legal challenges worldwide.

Esports Must Put Children’s Rights Ahead Of Competitive Ambitions, Report Says

Competitive gaming can help children build skills, find community and pursue achievement. However, as esports grows, young players face health, psychological and online safety risks, often without consistent safeguards, according to a new report from Save the Children.

The report, Protecting Child Rights in Esports, estimates that up to 300 million children worldwide participate in esports. It calls on the industry to prioritise the rights set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child over competitive ambitions.

Potential risks include disrupted sleep, musculoskeletal pain, anxiety, depression, sexism and online harassment. Intensive training can also leave less time for education, family and friends.

“Esports offers exciting opportunities for children, but participation should never come at the expense of their rights, wellbeing or development,” said Theo Toresson, a psychologist and gaming expert at Save the Children.

Children must be treated “as children first and competitors second”, he added, calling for their involvement in decisions that affect them.

Training Standards Remain Uneven

The report highlights the lack of widely established standards for training hours and methods. Extended periods of sitting, insufficient breaks and schedules that interfere with sleep, exercise and schoolwork can affect young players’ health and development.

Poor posture and long sessions may also cause neck, shoulder and wrist pain, while late-night gaming can undermine sleep, concentration and mood.

Although some organisations provide guidance on breaks, nutrition, sleep and hydration, a representative of a national esports federation told the report that this advice often draws on separate studies rather than a centralised set of guidelines.

The report also notes positive findings: many professional esports players report satisfactory levels of physical activity, and higher-ranking players often place greater emphasis on fitness.

Online Harassment Adds To Mental Health Risks

Gaming communities and livestreaming platforms can help young players build connections and public profiles, but they may also expose them to cyberbullying, discrimination and privacy violations.

An analysis cited in the report examined chatrooms across 302 gameplay segments involving the 20 most popular Twitch streamers. It found sexist language in 62% of streams, racist language in 37%, ableist language in 84% and violent language in 97%.

Some esports federations and teams require staff to receive mental health first-aid training, but the practice remains uncommon. Young competitors may also face public scrutiny through livestreams, interviews and social media before they have the support to manage it.

Safeguards Must Extend Beyond Gameplay

The report raises further concerns about unequal participation linked to gender, race, LGBTQIA+ identity and disability. It also highlights children’s limited involvement in decisions affecting them and the risk of economic exploitation by teams, agents or parents, particularly where contracts lack transparency.

Inadequate supervision at live events presents additional risks.

Save the Children argues that protecting young competitors requires more than advice on posture and screen breaks. Clear standards, responsible oversight and age-appropriate safeguards are needed to ensure esports supports children’s development rather than putting it at risk.

As competitive gaming expands, the industry faces growing pressure to make children’s rights and wellbeing part of its operating standards.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter