Breaking news

Gold’s Gleam: Caution Amid The Rally

Gold prices are surging, with the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) fund up about 11% in 2025 and returns climbing roughly 42% over the past year. Gold futures, too, are on the rise—up around 10% year-to-date and 36% higher than last year. By contrast, the S&P 500 has barely moved in 2025, gaining only 1.5%, and has risen 17% over the past year.

Yet, as the allure of the precious metal intensifies, seasoned investors are urging restraint. Certified financial planner Lee Baker of Claris Financial Advisors recalls, “I didn’t get any calls from clients about gold a year ago. Now, I get them regularly.” He cites Warren Buffett’s timeless advice: “Be cautious when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.” Baker warns that while the current fervor is tempting, the typical investor should limit gold allocation to no more than 3% of a diversified portfolio—lest they fall into the classic trap of buying high and selling low.

Why are gold prices on the rise? The answer lies in its enduring reputation as a safe haven during turbulent times. Investors flock to gold amid uncertainty, with recent US sanctions against Russia acting as a turbocharger for returns. These sanctions have spurred central banks, particularly in China, to boost their gold purchases instead of U.S. Treasury bonds, aiming to safeguard their reserves from potential geopolitical strife. Moreover, many see gold as a hedge against inflation, even though the data supporting that view remains mixed.

Samir Samana, senior global market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, notes, “In times of real crisis, bonds have shone brighter than gold.” His perspective underscores that while gold may shine during periods of high uncertainty, its rally might be unsustainable without a prolonged crisis.

For investors, the takeaway is clear: while gold’s current surge offers attractive returns, caution is paramount. As the market faces potential headwinds, following Buffett’s contrarian wisdom may help avoid the pitfalls of an overheated market. In the world of investing, where timing is everything, it’s not just about chasing returns—it’s about staying disciplined when the herd runs wild.

Meta’s $18 Billion Settlement Limits State Claims Over Children’s Data

Meta’s $18 billion settlement with attorneys general from 29 U.S. states includes a provision limiting future state claims over the company’s use of children’s data for age-assurance systems.

Under the agreement, Meta must develop, train and begin testing a system to identify users under 13 within a year of the settlement taking effect. The company already uses AI-based age-detection tools, although the agreement does not require the new system to use AI.

States Agree To Limits On Future Claims

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) generally restricts the collection and retention of personal data from children under 13. Under the settlement, the 29 state attorneys general agreed not to bring past, present or future claims under COPPA or similar state laws over the specified use of children’s data.

Meta will not be permitted to use information from users under 13 for advertising, marketing or algorithmic optimisation.

Federal Enforcement Remains Unclear

COPPA is primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which is not a party to the agreement. That leaves open the possibility of separate federal action over how Meta collects or uses children’s data.

Another issue is whether Meta can keep age-assurance data isolated from its other systems. An independent auditor will monitor compliance, but the settlement does not fully specify what data Meta can retain for training, how long it can be stored or whether derived insights can be used elsewhere.

Legal Risks Remain

Joshua Wurtzel, a partner at Schlam Stone & Dolan, said states could still pursue claims if Meta uses the data outside the settlement’s limits. Such cases could depend on how those limits are interpreted.

Peter Jackson, a data and intellectual property attorney at Greenberg Glusker, said the provision could “disincentivize future enforcement actions.”

The agreement gives Meta greater legal certainty around using children’s data for age assurance, but questions remain over federal enforcement, data retention and secondary use.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter