Breaking news

Global Networks: The Imperative Role Of Undersea Cables In A Data-Driven World

Over 95% of international data and voice traffic now traverses nearly a million miles of underwater communication cables. These sophisticated conduits support everything from government communications and financial transactions to high-definition streaming and real-time video conferencing. Their evolution from the 1850 telegraph cables across the English Channel to modern fiber optic systems underscores the critical role they play in our interconnected global economy.

Big Tech, Big Cables

In the past decade, the surge of webscale players has dramatically reshaped the subsea cable landscape. According to Paul Gabla, Chief Sales Officer at Alcatel Submarine Networks—the leading subsea cable manufacturer and installer—the likes of Meta, Google, and Amazon now account for nearly half of the market. This transformation reflects a growing demand fueled by the development of artificial intelligence and the expansion of vast data center networks.

For instance, Meta’s recently unveiled Project Waterworth will deploy a staggering 50,000 km (31,000 miles) of cable across five continents, marking it as the world’s most ambitious subsea cable initiative. Similarly, Amazon’s Fastnet project—designed to link Maryland’s eastern shore with County Cork, Ireland—boasts a capacity exceeding 320 terabits per second, a metric equated to streaming 12.5 million high-definition movies simultaneously.

Vulnerabilities And The Cost Of Interruption

Despite their importance, the infrastructure is not without its vulnerabilities. Accidental damage from fishing operations or ship anchors remains a persistent risk, while emerging incidents have raised concerns about potential sabotage. Erin Murphy, a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explains that a single cable disruption could isolate entire countries from critical services such as banking, e-commerce, and essential communications. This was starkly illustrated in Tonga’s 2022 incident, when an underwater volcanic eruption severed its sole communication link.

More recently, cable cuts in the Red Sea impacted Microsoft’s Azure cloud services, revealing that even temporary disruptions can lead to increased latency and degraded performance for users across Asia and the Middle East.

Heightened Geopolitical Tensions And Regulatory Scrutiny

The strategic nature of subsea cables has not gone unnoticed by governments. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has tightened regulations for foreign firms involved in building these networks, explicitly citing concerns over potential security threats from nations like Russia and China. FCC Chair Brendan Carr has emphasized efforts to ensure that critical hardware remains uncompromised, banning equipment from companies such as Huawei and ZTE.

In parallel, congressional oversight has intensified. Recently, a group of House Republicans queried tech giants including Meta, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft regarding their associations with Chinese cable maintenance providers. These moves underscore the increasing intersection of national security and digital infrastructure amid growing U.S.-China tensions.

Looking Forward

Investment in new subsea cable projects is projected to soar, with estimates nearing $13 billion between 2025 and 2027—almost double the capital invested in the preceding period. As tech giants expand their global networks, the integrity and resilience of subsea cables remain paramount for sustained connectivity and economic stability.

In an era where digital communication serves as the backbone of commerce and personal interaction, a robust underwater cable network is not merely a technical necessity, but a strategic imperative for the modern world.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter