Breaking news

Global Networks: The Imperative Role Of Undersea Cables In A Data-Driven World

Over 95% of international data and voice traffic now traverses nearly a million miles of underwater communication cables. These sophisticated conduits support everything from government communications and financial transactions to high-definition streaming and real-time video conferencing. Their evolution from the 1850 telegraph cables across the English Channel to modern fiber optic systems underscores the critical role they play in our interconnected global economy.

Big Tech, Big Cables

In the past decade, the surge of webscale players has dramatically reshaped the subsea cable landscape. According to Paul Gabla, Chief Sales Officer at Alcatel Submarine Networks—the leading subsea cable manufacturer and installer—the likes of Meta, Google, and Amazon now account for nearly half of the market. This transformation reflects a growing demand fueled by the development of artificial intelligence and the expansion of vast data center networks.

For instance, Meta’s recently unveiled Project Waterworth will deploy a staggering 50,000 km (31,000 miles) of cable across five continents, marking it as the world’s most ambitious subsea cable initiative. Similarly, Amazon’s Fastnet project—designed to link Maryland’s eastern shore with County Cork, Ireland—boasts a capacity exceeding 320 terabits per second, a metric equated to streaming 12.5 million high-definition movies simultaneously.

Vulnerabilities And The Cost Of Interruption

Despite their importance, the infrastructure is not without its vulnerabilities. Accidental damage from fishing operations or ship anchors remains a persistent risk, while emerging incidents have raised concerns about potential sabotage. Erin Murphy, a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explains that a single cable disruption could isolate entire countries from critical services such as banking, e-commerce, and essential communications. This was starkly illustrated in Tonga’s 2022 incident, when an underwater volcanic eruption severed its sole communication link.

More recently, cable cuts in the Red Sea impacted Microsoft’s Azure cloud services, revealing that even temporary disruptions can lead to increased latency and degraded performance for users across Asia and the Middle East.

Heightened Geopolitical Tensions And Regulatory Scrutiny

The strategic nature of subsea cables has not gone unnoticed by governments. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has tightened regulations for foreign firms involved in building these networks, explicitly citing concerns over potential security threats from nations like Russia and China. FCC Chair Brendan Carr has emphasized efforts to ensure that critical hardware remains uncompromised, banning equipment from companies such as Huawei and ZTE.

In parallel, congressional oversight has intensified. Recently, a group of House Republicans queried tech giants including Meta, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft regarding their associations with Chinese cable maintenance providers. These moves underscore the increasing intersection of national security and digital infrastructure amid growing U.S.-China tensions.

Looking Forward

Investment in new subsea cable projects is projected to soar, with estimates nearing $13 billion between 2025 and 2027—almost double the capital invested in the preceding period. As tech giants expand their global networks, the integrity and resilience of subsea cables remain paramount for sustained connectivity and economic stability.

In an era where digital communication serves as the backbone of commerce and personal interaction, a robust underwater cable network is not merely a technical necessity, but a strategic imperative for the modern world.

EU Mercosur Agreement Sparks Political Battle Over Cyprus Agriculture

A political battleground emerged in the Parliamentary Agriculture Committee’s latest session, as fierce debates broke out over the controversial trade deal between the European Union and Latin American nations under the Mercosur framework. Lawmakers voiced deep concerns regarding food safety and the prospects for local agriculture, particularly following the high-profile absence of the Minister of Trade.

Minister Absence And Parliamentary Integrity

Committee Chair Giannakis Gabriel expressed strong disapproval over the Minister’s no-show, noting that the extraordinary session was scheduled at midday at the Minister’s own request. “His absence undermines the authority of the parliament,” Mr. Gabriel declared. Given that the Minister is not abroad, it was expected that he would be present to clarify why Cyprus supported an agreement widely criticized as disadvantaging the agricultural sector.

Trade Deal Under Scrutiny

In his address, A.C.E.L General Secretary Stefanos Stefanos described the pact as a “dangerous agreement” imposed under the pressure of multinational conglomerates. He especially critiqued the contrasting sanitary standards whereby, while the EU bans our farmers from using certain pesticides and antibiotics, the Mercosur deal appears to allow imports produced with these very substances. His remarks underscored the possibility of double standards in safety measures and the potential long-term impacts on Cypriot agriculture.

Economic And Safety Concerns

Legislators questioned the basis of government studies that justified backing the agreement, even as Cyprus’ agricultural sustainability is increasingly threatened by water scarcity and soaring production costs. Representatives from various political factions pointed to insufficient controls over import volumes and tariff structures. For example, Christos Orphanidis (DIKO) demanded precise data on imports from Latin America, citing honey as a case in point, and pressed for clear explanations regarding the tariff regime.

Legal And Health Implications

Questions about legal authority were raised by Elias Myriantounos (EDEK), who inquired whether parliament can reject or amend the agreement should economic studies forecast negative outcomes. Environmental advocates, like Haralambos Theopemptou of the Movement of Ecologists, emphasized the need to safeguard traditional products such as halloumi, highlighting concerns over how rigorous food safety controls will be maintained. Meanwhile, Linos Papagiannis (ELAM) cautioned against unfair competition, drawing parallels with challenges posed by lower-standard goods from occupied territories.

Protecting Local Interests

The overarching message from lawmakers was clear: the future of Cyprus’ farming community and the well-being of its citizens should not be sacrificed at the altar of commercial trade. Agricultural organizations have voiced alarm over the importation of goods potentially contaminated with banned substances, the risk of market distortion by low-quality products, and the lack of localized impact studies. They argue that the agreement is biased in favor of select corporate interests, ultimately undermining consumer safety and the livelihood of European farmers.

As this debate continues to unfold, the outcome of these deliberations will be pivotal in determining not only trade policy but also the long-term economic and food security landscape of Cyprus.

Parliamentary Committee Session
Economic Impact Discussion

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter