Breaking news

Foreigners Driving Cyprus Property Prices Through The Roof: Bypassing Laws And Raising Concerns

Foreign buyers are sweeping up land across Cyprus, sidestepping local regulations, and pushing property prices to unprecedented levels. Meanwhile, this trend is creating a housing crisis for residents, particularly young couples who are struggling to find affordable homes.

While legislation does exist, including restrictions on foreign ownership, it appears to be easily bypassed. Sources close to the matter suggest that foreigners are increasingly purchasing property via legal entities, such as companies, which allows them to sidestep the scrutiny intended by the law.

The issue has been a topic of public debate for some time, but now it’s taking center stage in a more focused manner, thanks to a new parliamentary push. Today, the parliamentary Interior Committee will discuss a bill introduced by Nikos Georgiou, the DISY MP for Famagusta.

Representatives from the Ministry of Interior, the Department of Land and Surveys, the Ministry of Finance, the Legal Service of the Republic, and the Registrar of Companies and Intellectual Property have all been invited to share their views. They will be tasked with shedding light on the growing issue of foreign buyers bypassing the law by acquiring property through companies and trusts.

Tightening The Legal Framework

Georgiou’s proposed bill aims to modernize Cyprus’ property acquisition laws for foreigners, ensuring more transparency and tightening controls. According to the explanatory memorandum, the aim is to protect public interests by improving the monitoring process, enforcing stricter due diligence, and ensuring professionals like lawyers and accountants adhere to stringent ‘Know Your Client’ (KYC) guidelines.

The proposed law would essentially embed these professionals into the process, ensuring they verify the identity of foreign buyers before any property transactions can go through. This move mimics anti-money laundering practices and aims to close the loopholes that allow foreigners to bypass local controls by using legal entities.

Loopholes For Companies

As citizens and officials raise concerns, the current law (Article 3) already imposes restrictions on foreign individuals purchasing real estate, which requires prior approval from the Council of Ministers. The legislation also sets clear boundaries for the area of land a foreigner can acquire, ensuring it remains within manageable limits for residential or business purposes.

However, as pointed out by Nikos Georgiou in a parliamentary question last summer, there is growing evidence that foreigners are exploiting these laws by buying property through companies. This raises the question: why should restrictions exist for individuals if they can easily circumvent the law through corporate structures?

As legal expert George Koukounis pointed out years ago, any foreigner can establish a Cypriot company to purchase property without facing the same constraints. The problem lies in why natural persons face limitations when they can bypass these through a company.

European Perspective On Foreign Property Ownership

While Cyprus isn’t the only country facing these issues, it does stand out. Across Europe, many countries have taken steps to address similar concerns.

In Finland, a recent report called for stricter legislation to prevent foreigners from acquiring property, especially from countries whose actions threaten national security. In the UK, transparency rules and anti-money laundering measures are in place, ensuring more thorough checks on foreign buyers. Meanwhile, in Greece, foreign purchases are restricted in border regions and require special permits from the Ministry of National Defense.

These measures reflect the growing sense of caution in Europe over foreign ownership of land and property. The increasing concerns in Cyprus may well push for similar reforms, with calls for greater scrutiny of foreign buyers becoming louder by the day.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter