Breaking news

Foreign Demand Remains Resilient in Cypriot Real Estate: Strategic Insights and Regional Trends

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

October 24, 2025

International investment continues to assert its robust presence in Cyprus’ real estate market, with 1,669 properties sold to overseas buyers over the past year, as confirmed by Interior Minister Constantinos Ioannou. This sustained global interest underscores the island’s multifaceted appeal to investors from diverse regions, enhancing the attractiveness of Cypriot real estate.

Rising International Acquisitions

Between September 2024 and September 2025, 962 homes were purchased by foreign buyers, segmented into 385 transactions by European nationals and 577 by non-European investors. Paphos emerged as a hotspot, where heightened international demand has contributed to significant price appreciations. In addition, the market saw 350 plot sales — with 218 to EU citizens and 132 to non-Europeans — complemented by 357 field transactions predominantly to European buyers.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Distinct Regional Preferences

Buyer preferences reveal a clear geographic split. Europeans have shown a marked preference for Limassol, whereas non-EU buyers are increasingly attracted to Larnaca’s growing momentum. In Nicosia, the foremost buyers were Greeks with 403 properties, followed by Romanians, Russians, and Lebanese. Famagusta recorded a dominant presence of British buyers, while in Larnaca, regional investors such as Israelis, Lebanese, and Britons have been particularly active. Limassol continued to attract substantial investments from Russians, Israelis, and Greeks, while Paphos remained a favourite among British, Israeli, and Russian buyers.

Transactional Dynamics Across Districts

The Department of Lands and Surveys (DLS) provided an expansive view of the market, noting 19,155 transfer cases in 2024 covering 21,469 properties. These transactions represent a declared value of €3.94 billion, with an accepted transfer duty value of €4.30 billion. Limassol led in both transaction volume and value, registering 5,054 cases amounting to over €1.43 billion declared. Nicosia, Paphos, and Larnaca followed, while Famagusta remained the smallest segment, reflecting differentiated regional market dynamics.

Robust Overseas Activity

Further evidence of the market’s vitality comes from the DLS’s dataset on foreign buyers, which recorded 6,754 international transactions in 2024. Among these, 2,785 were by EU nationals, with 3,969 transactions from non-EU buyers, and July emerged as the peak month with 703 non-EU contracts filed.

Challenges In Data Collection

Minister Ioannou clarified that while no hotel units were sold during this period, the data for apartment buildings remains incomplete due to challenges in tracking developments without updated or horizontally divided title deeds. Once a building is registered, each individual unit—be it an apartment, shop, or office—is recorded separately, ensuring detailed market transparency.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.