Breaking news

EU’s New Customs Regime: A Strategic Move to Rein in Low-Value Shipments

Overview Of The New Tariff Policy

The European Union is poised to overhaul its approach to low-value shipments, a trade segment that currently exceeds $2.5 billion in annual turnover yet results in significant fiscal losses due to untaxed transactions and waived customs duties. In a sweeping policy change, tariffs and customs levies will be applied to packages valued under €150 starting in 2026, marking a decisive shift aimed at restoring fiscal balance and ensuring fair competition within the internal market.

Addressing Unfair Competition And Environmental Concerns

Currently, an estimated 4.5 billion low-value items enter the EU each year, predominantly from China, without incurring customs duties. According to Panos Chatzipanagiotou, Professor of Economics at the Athens University of Economics and Business, this exemption not only distorts competition—particularly harming domestic European producers—but also raises environmental concerns. With an average shipment value ranging from €20 to €30, the cumulative impact of bypassed tariffs represents a significant fiscal challenge for EU member states.

Implications For Global E-Commerce Platforms

The policy is set to recalibrate the playing field for e-commerce giants such as Temu and Shein, which have capitalized on current exemptions to minimize costs and offer ultra-competitive pricing. By closing regulatory loopholes that have historically facilitated tax evasion and smuggling, the EU aims to enhance transparency and integrity in cross-border trade. However, whether these changes will significantly deter consumer purchases from third-country platforms remains to be seen, especially as many young consumers are drawn to these platforms for trendiness rather than price alone.

Operational And Administrative Challenges

As the transition to full customs oversight takes effect, both businesses and consumers must adjust to a new reality marked by potential delays and increased administrative costs. Customs authorities across Europe will face the monumental task of processing millions of small packages with enhanced scrutiny. Chatzipanagiotou warns that the added bureaucracy could slow down delivery times and impose additional costs on national administrations as they invest in modernizing their IT systems and organizational structures.

The Broader Economic And Competitive Landscape

Critics argue that the additional charges—estimated at around €2 per package, not including VAT—might disproportionately affect consumers, potentially rendering imported goods less competitive against domestically produced alternatives. However, market dynamics such as volume discounts on e-commerce platforms may counterbalance these effects. The new measures are seen as both a remedy for longstanding fiscal issues and a defensive maneuver designed to protect European industries from the pressures of ultra-low-cost imports.

Future Outlook And Revenue Projections

While precise revenue forecasts remain uncertain, the policy change highlights the EU’s determination to recalibrate international trade practices. The measure is expected to generate significant tariff revenue over time, while also prompting a reevaluation of business strategies among domestic producers and international e-commerce entities. As implementation begins in 2026, the effectiveness of the new customs regime will be rigorously tested against the evolving landscape of global commerce.

Conclusion

By targeting the loopholes that have long enabled tax avoidance and undercut domestic production, the EU’s decision reflects a broader strategic ambition: to fortify its internal market and foster fair competition. As stakeholders across the board—from policymakers to multinational e-commerce operators—brace for this transformative shift, the coming years will serve as a critical test of the policy’s capacity to harmonize fiscal integrity with the dynamics of modern global trade.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter