Breaking news

Eurozone Inflation Outlook: Cyprus on Track to Achieve 2% Target by 2026

The latest European Commission projections signal a promising outlook for Cyprus, one of the few Eurozone countries poised to meet the European Central Bank’s 2% inflation target by 2025–2026. Despite early challenges—including a surge in food and tourism prices driven by robust demand and the lagged effects of wage increases—Cyprus is expected to benefit from the normalization of wage growth and moderating energy and commodity prices.

Steady Disinflation Across the Eurozone

Across the Eurozone, headline inflation is forecast to decline from 2.4% in 2024 to 2.1% in 2025 and further to 1.7% in 2026. The broader EU is set to see inflation drop to 1.9% by 2026, reinforcing a cautiously optimistic disinflationary trend in the region. While individual member states experience varying paces of adjustment, the overall narrative points toward a gradual stabilization of prices.

Cyprus and Its Select Peers

In this context, Cyprus is emerging as a standout performer, maintaining inflation around the critical 2% mark well into 2026. Among its peers, France leads the reduction trend with an expected inflation rate of 0.9% in 2025, followed by Ireland, Finland, and Italy—with Italy projected at 1.8% in 2025 and potentially dropping further to 1.5% in 2026.

Diverse National Trajectories

The projections detail a nuanced landscape. For instance, Belgium is expected to see inflation ease from 2.8% in 2025 to 1.8% in 2026, bolstered by diminishing industrial and energy pressures. Germany, after recording 2.5% in 2024, is on course for a reduction to 2.4% in 2025 and 1.9% by 2026, aided by a significant decline in wholesale energy prices. Meanwhile, Estonia and Latvia confront higher inflationary pressures driven by domestic fiscal dynamics and wage-led services costs, though both are poised for improvements as global commodity pressures subside.

Looking Ahead

Countries such as Greece and Spain, which have experienced higher inflation rates, are also expected to witness gradual declines as easing energy costs and moderated service prices take effect. The European outlook underscores how varying economic conditions—from persistent wage pressures to fleeting commodity shocks—can shape national inflation trajectories. As the region moves toward 2026, policymakers and business leaders alike must remain vigilant, adapting strategies to a landscape characterized by both resilience and change.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter