Breaking news

Europe’s Tech Leaders Demand Radical Shift Toward Digital Sovereignty

A coalition of Europe’s top tech firms and industry groups is urging EU policymakers to take decisive action to reduce reliance on foreign digital infrastructure. In an open letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and digital chief Henna Virkkunen, over 80 signatories, representing around 100 organizations, call for a bold strategy to foster homegrown digital solutions—from AI and cloud platforms to chips and telecom networks.

A Call For Digital Independence

The letter underscores the need to prioritize European-built alternatives with strong commercial viability. Signatories include industry heavyweights from cloud computing, telecom, defense, and startup ecosystems, all pushing for a shift towards “sovereign digital infrastructure.”

The push for what some call a “Euro Stack” isn’t new, but geopolitical tensions have heightened urgency. A January report by competition economist Cristina Caffarra outlined the strategy in-depth, and recent industry conferences have seen growing momentum behind the idea.

The turning point? The Munich Security Conference, where U.S. Vice President JD Vance sent a clear message: America’s interests come first. European leaders left the event with no illusions about the fragility of the transatlantic digital alliance. The specter of a U.S. executive order cutting off essential tech services has made European autonomy a pressing issue.

“Imagine Europe without access to search engines, email, or cloud computing. It sounds dystopian, but it’s a real risk,” warns Wolfgang Oels, COO of Ecosia, a Berlin-based search engine and one of the letter’s signatories. “Something similar already happened to Ukraine.”

The “Buy European” Mandate

The coalition’s demands are clear: EU institutions must lead by example, adopting procurement policies that prioritize European-made tech. The goal isn’t exclusionary but rather to create a level playing field where European firms can compete and justify investment.

“Americans buy American, the Chinese buy Chinese, but Europe acts as if neutrality is a virtue,” says Caffarra. “It’s time for a change.”

The letter suggests offering incentives for businesses to switch to local providers—potentially through subsidies or voucher programs. The idea is to make European alternatives competitive, not by shutting out foreign tech, but by ensuring that European firms have a viable market.

Scaling Up Through Collaboration

Beyond funding, the coalition urges the EU to encourage a “pooling and federating” model to help European tech companies scale. This includes common standards, interoperability initiatives, and aggregation of existing assets to strengthen Europe’s position against U.S. cloud giants.

Past initiatives, like the Gaia-X cloud project, failed due to the involvement of American hyperscalers, which diluted its sovereignty ambitions. The new approach seeks to prevent similar missteps.

A Sovereign Infrastructure Fund

To support capital-intensive tech sectors like semiconductors and quantum computing, the letter calls for the creation of a “Sovereign Infrastructure Fund.” Caffarra argues that even modest funding could significantly boost open-source projects and strategic infrastructure.

“Europe’s open-source community is vast and capable. A targeted investment strategy could yield substantial returns,” she says.

Rethinking Europe’s Digital Strategy

Despite past rhetoric on digital sovereignty, the EU’s current approach has been fragmented and ineffective, the coalition argues. Too much funding flows into academic research rather than tangible, market-driven solutions. The signatories push for a more industry-led approach, where funding is directed toward scalable, commercially viable projects.

“Europe can no longer afford to be reactive,” Caffarra asserts. “We need a proactive, industrial strategy that puts digital sovereignty at the heart of economic policy.”

As global competition intensifies and geopolitical risks mount, the message from Europe’s tech leaders is unmistakable: The EU must act decisively, or risk losing control of its digital future.

ESMA Pushes EU To Tighten Crypto Rules On Fraud, Influencers And DeFi Risk

The European Securities and Markets Authority is pressing Brussels to strengthen the European Union’s crypto rulebook, warning that the current framework leaves gaps that can be exploited by fraudsters, unregulated promoters and fast-evolving digital asset business models.

A Regulatory Reset For A Fast-Changing Market

In a set of recommendations to the European Commission, ESMA said the bloc should simplify its crypto regime while tightening investor protections and adapting to developments such as decentralised finance, staking, lending and borrowing. The regulator’s central message is clear: Europe needs a framework that is easier to apply, but harder to abuse.

That balance matters. Crypto markets have expanded beyond simple token trading into a broader ecosystem that includes yield products, liquidity services and increasingly complex structures. Regulators, ESMA argued, must keep pace with that shift rather than rely on rules designed for an earlier stage of the market.

Tougher Rules For Promotion And Disclosure

Among ESMA’s main proposals are stricter standards for crypto marketing, particularly where digital assets are promoted by online influencers and third parties. The authority wants clearer safeguards around promotional activity that can mislead retail investors or obscure the risks involved.

It is also calling for greater transparency on fees and costs across the sector, alongside proportionate disclosure requirements for staking, lending and borrowing products. Those disclosures, ESMA said, should spell out the relevant costs, risks, rewards, collateral arrangements and the possibility of losses before an investor commits capital.

For a market often marketed on speed and simplicity, the regulator’s message is that complexity must be laid bare rather than glossed over.

Sharper Tools Against Fraud And Non-Compliant Firms

ESMA is also seeking stronger supervisory powers to tackle unauthorised services, online fraud and stablecoins that do not meet EU standards. That includes improving the bloc’s ability to detect, block and deactivate fraudulent websites, as well as freeze crypto assets where there is suspicion of market abuse or terrorist financing.

The watchdog wants a firmer approach to firms based outside the EU that solicit European investors without authorisation under the Markets in Crypto-Assets regime, known as MiCA. It is also pushing for explicit rules preventing regulated crypto firms from offering services linked to stablecoins that fail to comply with MiCA requirements.

The goal is to speed up enforcement and reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, where firms exploit differences in national supervision or jurisdictional loopholes to sidestep tighter oversight.

Clarifying DeFi And Token Classification

As decentralised finance and stablecoins continue to grow, ESMA says the EU needs clearer criteria for determining which activities are truly decentralised and which should fall under regulatory supervision. It also proposes the creation of a new regulated crypto-asset service for firms that give users access to DeFi protocols.

At the same time, the authority wants more certainty around how crypto-assets are classified, including newer structures such as hybrid tokens. To reduce inconsistency across the single market, ESMA suggests giving itself the power to issue binding opinions on token classification so that identical products are treated the same across the EU.

That move would not only support harmonised enforcement, but also help firms navigate a market where the boundary between financial instrument, utility token and payment asset is increasingly blurred.

Simplification Without Weakening Oversight

Despite its tougher posture on fraud and consumer protection, ESMA also supports parts of the EU’s broader simplification agenda. It recommends streamlining crypto-asset white paper notification procedures, cutting duplicate authorisation requirements for some regulated firms and improving the consistency of prudential rules.

In practice, that would aim to reduce compliance friction for legitimate businesses without sacrificing supervisory standards. For established firms, the benefit would be fewer procedural overlaps; for investors, the gain would be clearer and more consistent protections.

Looking Beyond MiCA

ESMA’s proposals do not stop at the immediate review of MiCA. The authority says the EU should also prepare a framework for tokenised securities and on-chain settlement, laying the groundwork for a more integrated European tokenised capital market.

That longer-term vision points to a future in which securities issuance, trading and settlement increasingly move on-chain, with cross-border activity made easier by common rules and interoperable infrastructure. For Europe, the stakes are significant: get the framework right, and the bloc could become a serious hub for regulated digital finance. Get it wrong, and activity may migrate to jurisdictions that can move faster.

Aretilaw firm
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter