Breaking news

Europe’s Tech Leaders Demand Radical Shift Toward Digital Sovereignty

A coalition of Europe’s top tech firms and industry groups is urging EU policymakers to take decisive action to reduce reliance on foreign digital infrastructure. In an open letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and digital chief Henna Virkkunen, over 80 signatories, representing around 100 organizations, call for a bold strategy to foster homegrown digital solutions—from AI and cloud platforms to chips and telecom networks.

A Call For Digital Independence

The letter underscores the need to prioritize European-built alternatives with strong commercial viability. Signatories include industry heavyweights from cloud computing, telecom, defense, and startup ecosystems, all pushing for a shift towards “sovereign digital infrastructure.”

The push for what some call a “Euro Stack” isn’t new, but geopolitical tensions have heightened urgency. A January report by competition economist Cristina Caffarra outlined the strategy in-depth, and recent industry conferences have seen growing momentum behind the idea.

The turning point? The Munich Security Conference, where U.S. Vice President JD Vance sent a clear message: America’s interests come first. European leaders left the event with no illusions about the fragility of the transatlantic digital alliance. The specter of a U.S. executive order cutting off essential tech services has made European autonomy a pressing issue.

“Imagine Europe without access to search engines, email, or cloud computing. It sounds dystopian, but it’s a real risk,” warns Wolfgang Oels, COO of Ecosia, a Berlin-based search engine and one of the letter’s signatories. “Something similar already happened to Ukraine.”

The “Buy European” Mandate

The coalition’s demands are clear: EU institutions must lead by example, adopting procurement policies that prioritize European-made tech. The goal isn’t exclusionary but rather to create a level playing field where European firms can compete and justify investment.

“Americans buy American, the Chinese buy Chinese, but Europe acts as if neutrality is a virtue,” says Caffarra. “It’s time for a change.”

The letter suggests offering incentives for businesses to switch to local providers—potentially through subsidies or voucher programs. The idea is to make European alternatives competitive, not by shutting out foreign tech, but by ensuring that European firms have a viable market.

Scaling Up Through Collaboration

Beyond funding, the coalition urges the EU to encourage a “pooling and federating” model to help European tech companies scale. This includes common standards, interoperability initiatives, and aggregation of existing assets to strengthen Europe’s position against U.S. cloud giants.

Past initiatives, like the Gaia-X cloud project, failed due to the involvement of American hyperscalers, which diluted its sovereignty ambitions. The new approach seeks to prevent similar missteps.

A Sovereign Infrastructure Fund

To support capital-intensive tech sectors like semiconductors and quantum computing, the letter calls for the creation of a “Sovereign Infrastructure Fund.” Caffarra argues that even modest funding could significantly boost open-source projects and strategic infrastructure.

“Europe’s open-source community is vast and capable. A targeted investment strategy could yield substantial returns,” she says.

Rethinking Europe’s Digital Strategy

Despite past rhetoric on digital sovereignty, the EU’s current approach has been fragmented and ineffective, the coalition argues. Too much funding flows into academic research rather than tangible, market-driven solutions. The signatories push for a more industry-led approach, where funding is directed toward scalable, commercially viable projects.

“Europe can no longer afford to be reactive,” Caffarra asserts. “We need a proactive, industrial strategy that puts digital sovereignty at the heart of economic policy.”

As global competition intensifies and geopolitical risks mount, the message from Europe’s tech leaders is unmistakable: The EU must act decisively, or risk losing control of its digital future.

China’s Humanoid Robot Boom Faces A Bigger Question: Can These Machines Make Money?

Unitree’s $9 Billion Bet On The Future Of Robotics

China’s humanoid robotics industry is attracting huge investor interest, but as Unitree Robotics prepares for its public debut, questions are growing over whether its robots can move beyond impressive acrobatics and become commercially viable tools.

The Hangzhou-based startup priced its IPO at 150.8 yuan ($22.4) per share, raising $900 million and valuing the company at 61 billion yuan, or about $9 billion. The offering attracted record retail demand on Shanghai’s STAR Market, with the online tranche oversubscribed more than 5,000 times and a winning rate of just 0.018%. Strategic investors included AI startup DeepSeek.

A Unitree-linked pre-IPO perpetual contract was trading at roughly four times the IPO price on Friday, highlighting the speculative interest surrounding the company.

Unitree is known for robots capable of kung fu kicks, backflips and recovering from falls. Yet analysts question whether the technology is ready for large-scale commercial use. “For these humanoid robots, to be honest, they’re fascinating. They can dance and all that, but I’ve never seen them doing any real housework,” said Hao Hong, managing partner of Lotus Asset Management.

In its prospectus, Unitree warned that mass adoption could take longer than expected because robotic hands are still not precise or durable enough for sustained use.

From Acrobatic Robots To Commercial Machines

Even advanced humanoid robots can currently perform only a limited number of tasks and typically operate for a few hours before recharging, according to Dominik Pross, an equity analyst at VP Bank. Most models run for up to four hours, while robots also need to be trained for individual tasks.

“Robots have to be specifically trained for each and every task entrusted to them, even the simplest,” Pross said.

More robotics listings are expected, with Unitree rivals AgiBot and Leju Robotics seeking listings in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. LimX Dynamics founder Will Zhang said last month that “listing is a must.”

China’s Cost Advantage

China’s manufacturing scale has helped it establish a leading position in robotics. Wood Mackenzie expects the global humanoid robot fleet to surpass 10 million units by 2035, while China already accounts for more than 70% of global industrial robot installations and nearly 90% of humanoids deployed last year.

Average humanoid robot prices fell 93% between 2020 and 2025 to $58,000. Unitree’s flagship G1 costs $16,000, while SemiAnalysis estimates that the company has cut the price of its G1 EDU model by more than 45% to $27,300, while maintaining a 67% gross margin.

Falling prices and government support are attracting investment, but analysts say it will take time to prove that humanoid robots can generate strong returns. Unitree’s revenue more than quadrupled last year, although adjusted first-quarter profit fell more than 52% as research and development and marketing spending increased. Nearly three-quarters of its humanoid revenue in the first nine months of 2025 came from research and education, highlighting the gap between demonstrations and widespread commercial use.

“Unlike many early-stage robotics companies, the Unitree story is backed by real revenue growth,” said Jeff Ko, chief analyst at CoinEx. Still, he noted that its $9 billion valuation, at more than 200 times last year’s earnings, reflects significant speculative interest.

Geopolitical Risks

Unitree’s IPO momentum has continued despite growing pressure on Chinese robotics companies. The U.S. moved last month to ban imports of foreign-made humanoid and four-legged robots, potentially exposing Unitree, which generated about 13% of its revenue from the U.S. last year.

Access to Nvidia hardware and software is another risk, as Chinese robotics companies rely on the technology to power their systems. “Chinese robot producers are not yet in a position to do without Western components completely,” Pross said.

China’s control over rare earths used in robot actuators and motors could nevertheless give its manufacturers an advantage, according to Bernstein analyst Dien Wang.

The Bigger Robotics Opportunity

The potential market is attracting major players, including Tesla, whose CEO Elon Musk is expanding production plans for Optimus humanoid robots. At the same time, some researchers argue that the future of robotics will not be limited to humanoids: quadruped and purpose-built robots can be cheaper and more reliable for repetitive industrial tasks, while humanoids may be better suited to unpredictable environments.

For Unitree, the challenge is no longer proving that its robots can perform impressive tricks. It is proving that they can do enough useful work to justify a $9 billion valuation.

eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter