Breaking news

Eurobank: The Impact Of Trump’s Tariffs On The Greek Economy – Exports To The US And Indirect Effects Through The EU

On the occasion of the inauguration of the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump, on January 20, 2025, and his campaign promises to implement protectionist policies in US trade, Eurobank analysts have provided insights into the potential effects on the Greek economy. These effects are outlined in the weekly bulletin “7 Days Economy,” using the most recent trade data between Greece and the US.

In the 11 months from January to November 2024, the share of the US in total Greek merchandise exports was around 4.8% or €2.19 billion at current prices. However, the impact of any potential protectionist policies by the US may not be limited to direct effects on Greek exports but may also have indirect repercussions. These could stem from Greece’s trade relations with the European Union (EU), where around 20% of EU-27 exports are purchased by US entities.

According to the latest trade data from Eurostat, Greek exports of goods to the US during this period amounted to €2.19 billion, while imports from the US stood at €1.99 billion. As a result, Greece had a trade surplus with the US of €203.5 million. When breaking it down by category, food and live animals showed the largest surplus at €521.6 million, while fossil fuels, lubricants, and related products recorded the biggest deficit at €399 million.

The share of Greek merchandise exports to the US stood at 4.8% in the period from January to November 2024, slightly above the long-term average of 4.5%. For the entire year of 2024, Greek exports to the US are expected to account for 1% of Greece’s GDP. Among the product categories, the US accounted for 7.7% of Greek food and live animal exports, followed by oils and fats (7.2%), machinery and transport equipment (6.5%), and manufactured goods mainly classified by raw materials (5.1%).

A potential increase in tariffs on products imported by the US from the EU-27 could negatively affect some of these Greek exports, particularly in the food and live animals sector, oils and fats, and machinery. For 2024, Greek exports of goods to the US are projected to reach 1% of GDP or approximately €2.4 billion. The extent of the impact on Greek exports will depend on the magnitude of any tariff increase and the elasticity of demand for Greek goods in the face of such price hikes.

Indirect Effects Of Greece’s Trade Relations With The EU

In addition to the direct impact on Greek exports to the US, protectionist measures from the US could also have indirect effects on the Greek economy. This is due to the interconnected nature of Greece’s trade with the EU-27 and the EU’s trade with the US. In the period from January to November 2024, the EU-27 accounted for approximately 55.3% of Greek merchandise exports, or €25.4 billion. The US, in turn, represented 20.6% of EU-27 exports, totaling €490.1 billion (excluding intra-EU trade).

A potential tariff increase on EU-27 exports to the US could lead to:

  1. A reduction in EU-27 exports of goods to the US.
  2. A decrease in the income of EU-27 businesses.
  3. Lower Greek exports of goods and services to the EU-27.

Furthermore, a portion of Greek exports to the EU-27 consists of intermediate goods used in the production of final products that the EU-27 exports to the US. This adds another layer of potential impact on Greek exports through participation in European value chains.

AI Spending Is Complicating The Fed’s Fight Against Inflation

Silicon Valley leaders have long argued that artificial intelligence will make technology and services dramatically cheaper. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has described a future where intelligence becomes extremely inexpensive, while Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has predicted that AI and robotics will create greater abundance and drive down costs.

So far, those benefits have yet to materialise at scale. AI adoption remains relatively slow, while the enormous investment needed for data centres and AI infrastructure is putting pressure on electricity prices, supply chains and other costs. For the Federal Reserve, this creates a difficult balancing act: AI could eventually boost productivity and reduce inflation, but its current buildout is contributing to higher prices.

OpenAI chief economist Ronnie Chatterji said AI needs to be adopted by organisations and generate measurable value before its broader economic impact becomes visible in productivity statistics.

AI Adoption Remains Uneven

Capital spending on AI infrastructure in the U.S. is expected to reach $581 billion this year, according to Goldman Sachs Research, with global investment potentially reaching $1 trillion.

Despite the scale of spending, adoption remains far from universal. A May survey by the U.S. Census Bureau found that 17% to 20% of U.S. businesses reported using AI, with adoption significantly higher among large companies.

Companies that have implemented AI at scale also highlight the challenges. Julie Averill, former CIO of Lululemon, said successful deployment requires changes in employee behaviour and trust in the technology. OpenAI has observed a similar divide: its most advanced business users deploy AI at around eight times the rate of average companies.

Why Productivity Gains May Take Time

Economists point to the limits of automation. AI can perform individual tasks effectively, but many jobs combine tasks that are difficult to automate.

Stanford professor Charles Jones refers to these as “weak links”. Radiology, for example, involves interpreting scans but also communicating with patients and working with colleagues. AI can automate part of the job without eliminating the profession itself.

As a result, the full economic impact of AI may not become clear until businesses adopt the technology more broadly and reorganise their operations around it.

AI Adds To The Fed’s Policy Challenge

AI’s economic impact has become part of the Federal Reserve’s policy debate. Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has argued that AI could eventually become a significant disinflationary force by increasing productivity and strengthening U.S. competitiveness.

Other officials are more cautious. In July, the Fed kept interest rates at 3.5% to 3.75%, while some officials expressed concern that AI infrastructure spending could add to inflationary pressures.

Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari pointed to massive data-centre investment as a new source of demand. Household electricity prices rose 10% in the two years through July, compared with a 6.2% increase in overall consumer prices. Meanwhile, shortages of chips and other AI components are pushing up costs. JPMorgan Chase estimates that DRAM prices could rise 400% by the end of 2026 compared with 2024.

Warsh has consequently adopted a more cautious tone, saying that while AI investment is laying the groundwork for future growth, the timing and scale of its economic effects remain difficult to predict.

For the Fed, the challenge is clear: AI could eventually deliver major productivity gains, but the cost of building that future is already showing up in the economy.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter