Breaking news

EU Moves Forward With AI Act Despite US Pushback

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 4, 2025

Brussels is pressing ahead with the enforcement of its landmark AI Act, which includes new guidance on prohibited AI practices, despite threats from former US President Donald Trump regarding the regulation of American tech companies.

The AI Act is seen as the world’s most comprehensive AI regulation. On Sunday, the European Union began enforcing provisions that ban certain practices, including the creation of facial recognition databases through internet scraping. New guidance on how these rules should be applied will be released by the European Commission on Tuesday, with further provisions targeting high-risk AI applications, such as those in healthcare, to be rolled out by 2027.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The EU’s push for enforcement comes as US-based tech companies, supported by Trump’s administration, express concerns over the regulation. Trump has warned that the EU’s treatment of American firms could result in retaliation, particularly regarding fines imposed on companies like Meta and Google. Trump’s administration has also signaled a shift in the US stance on AI regulation, promoting a less restrictive approach, including the announcement of a $500 billion AI infrastructure project backed by SoftBank and OpenAI.

Despite this pushback, the European Commission is steadfast in its commitment to enforcing the AI Act. The law requires companies developing high-risk AI systems to be more transparent about their processes and undergo risk assessments. Non-compliance could lead to hefty fines or even a ban from the EU market.

Big Tech has raised concerns that the EU’s transparency requirements could stifle innovation, particularly rules allowing third-party inspections of AI models for risk assessments. Meta has been vocal about the “onerous” nature of these provisions. However, Brussels continues to assert its position as the global leader in trustworthy AI, even as it navigates increasing opposition from the tech sector.

Caterina Rodelli, an EU policy analyst at Access Now, suggests that the approach to implementing the AI Act could shift under the new US administration. “There’s a risk that regulators could relax the rules, potentially undermining their effectiveness,” she noted.

While the EU’s recent bans have been clear, much is still to be determined in negotiations over the Code of Practice for general-purpose AI, which will affect major AI models such as Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s GPT-4. These discussions, which involve hundreds of stakeholders, are set to conclude in April.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Competition Authority Launches Comprehensive Review of ExxonMobil Cyprus Acquisition

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 16, 2025

Investigation Initiated Over Strategic Acquisition

The Competition Protection Authority has commenced a thorough investigation into the acquisition of ExxonMobil Cyprus Limited’s share capital by Petrolina Holdings Public Ltd through Med Energywise Ltd. This inquiry was formally initiated following a session held on 10 September 2025, after an in-depth review of the pertinent report by the Authority’s Service.

Concerns Over Market Compatibility

Authorities have expressed serious concerns regarding the compatibility of the transaction with established competitive practices. The review indicates that the acquisition may affect several critical petroleum markets, both horizontally and vertically, thereby raising the potential for adverse impacts on market dynamics.

Horizontal Market Dynamics

On the horizontal front, potential effects have been identified in the import market for petroleum products, as well as in both wholesale and retail distribution channels of these products. The consolidation is believed to increase the risk of price rises and coordinated actions, given the direct competitive proximity between Petrolina and ExxonMobil.

Vertical and Adjacent Market Implications

Vertical aspects of the merger are also under close scrutiny. The new entity could restrict competitors’ access to critical infrastructure such as storage facilities, supply channels, and customer bases. These restrictions could further affect the onshore distribution of fuels, the wholesale market for lubricants, and specialized technical services connected with fuel station operations.

Local Market Considerations

Particular attention is being paid to the potential concentration in the retail fuel market. The investigation suggests that a reduced competitive landscape within a four-kilometer radius of the companies’ fuel stations could lead to diminished local competition, adversely impacting consumer prices and options.

Next Steps and Industry Impact

The Competition Protection Authority, which reached a unanimous decision to pursue a full investigation, remains open to submissions from parties that might be affected by this transaction, as mandated by current legislation. A final decision is expected within four months upon receipt of all necessary evidence, potentially setting a significant precedent for future market consolidation cases in the energy sector.