Breaking news

Elon Musk Seeks Meta Financing for Bold $97.4 Billion OpenAI Bid Amid Legal Turmoil

In a high-stakes maneuver that underscores the tech giants’ growing rivalry in artificial intelligence, Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, has reportedly approached Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg with a proposition to finance a $97.4 billion acquisition of OpenAI. Court filings released this week reveal the unfolding complexities in a dispute that has pitted former allies against one another.

Rivalry And Legal Intrigue

Musk, whose launch of xAI in 2023 signaled his intent to contend directly with OpenAI, originally floated the takeover proposal in February. His proposal was fueled by mounting frustrations as OpenAI, under CEO Sam Altman, began transitioning into a for-profit model—an evolution that has reportedly undermined Musk’s strategic vision, given his earlier contributions to and alignment with the non-profit origins of the company.

Counter Claims And Strategic Maneuvers

Legal filings indicate that OpenAI has accused Musk and his new venture of executing a “sham bid” that not only jeopardizes its operations but has also provoked a series of counter claims. The tech leader’s aggressive litigation tactics and relentless public criticism via social media have intensified the legal and reputational battle between the two camps.

Meta’s Strategic Position In AI

As part of its counter strategy, OpenAI has sought to subpoena Meta for documented communications regarding Musk’s bid. While Meta has declined to comment, its filing underscores a significant competitive investment in artificial intelligence, recently marked by the hiring of top-tier researchers and enticing lucrative compensation packages. These measures reflect Meta’s ambition to solidify its AI capabilities, directly challenging OpenAI’s market leadership.

The Larger Implications

This episode not only highlights an escalating legal confrontation but also illustrates the wider strategic contest among top tech companies as they vie for dominance in a rapidly evolving AI landscape. With billions of dollars at stake and reputations on the line, industry insiders view this clash as indicative of the transformative dynamics shaping the future of technology investments and corporate strategy.

As the legal proceedings continue in a federal court in Northern California, the tech world waits with bated breath to see whether this audacious move by Musk will recalibrate the balance of power in the AI sector, or if the counterclaims will establish a new paradigm for competitive litigation in Silicon Valley.

Competition Authority Launches Comprehensive Review of ExxonMobil Cyprus Acquisition

Investigation Initiated Over Strategic Acquisition

The Competition Protection Authority has commenced a thorough investigation into the acquisition of ExxonMobil Cyprus Limited’s share capital by Petrolina Holdings Public Ltd through Med Energywise Ltd. This inquiry was formally initiated following a session held on 10 September 2025, after an in-depth review of the pertinent report by the Authority’s Service.

Concerns Over Market Compatibility

Authorities have expressed serious concerns regarding the compatibility of the transaction with established competitive practices. The review indicates that the acquisition may affect several critical petroleum markets, both horizontally and vertically, thereby raising the potential for adverse impacts on market dynamics.

Horizontal Market Dynamics

On the horizontal front, potential effects have been identified in the import market for petroleum products, as well as in both wholesale and retail distribution channels of these products. The consolidation is believed to increase the risk of price rises and coordinated actions, given the direct competitive proximity between Petrolina and ExxonMobil.

Vertical and Adjacent Market Implications

Vertical aspects of the merger are also under close scrutiny. The new entity could restrict competitors’ access to critical infrastructure such as storage facilities, supply channels, and customer bases. These restrictions could further affect the onshore distribution of fuels, the wholesale market for lubricants, and specialized technical services connected with fuel station operations.

Local Market Considerations

Particular attention is being paid to the potential concentration in the retail fuel market. The investigation suggests that a reduced competitive landscape within a four-kilometer radius of the companies’ fuel stations could lead to diminished local competition, adversely impacting consumer prices and options.

Next Steps and Industry Impact

The Competition Protection Authority, which reached a unanimous decision to pursue a full investigation, remains open to submissions from parties that might be affected by this transaction, as mandated by current legislation. A final decision is expected within four months upon receipt of all necessary evidence, potentially setting a significant precedent for future market consolidation cases in the energy sector.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter